15
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Comparison of xenobiotic-metabolising human, porcine, rodent, and piscine cytochrome P450.

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Cytochrome P450 proteins (CYP450s) are present in most domains of life and play a critical role in the metabolism of endogenous compounds and xenobiotics. The effects of exposure to xenobiotics depend heavily on the expression and activity of drug-metabolizing CYP450s, which is determined by species, genetic background, age, gender, diet, and exposure to environmental pollutants. Numerous reports have investigated the role of different vertebrate CYP450s in xenobiotic metabolism. Model organisms provide powerful experimental tools to investigate Phase I metabolism. The aim of the present review is to compare the existing data on human CYP450 proteins (1-3 families) with those found in pigs, mice, and fish. We will highlight differences and similarities and identify research gaps which need to be addressed in order to use these species as models that mimic human traits. Moreover, we will discuss the roles of nuclear receptors in the cellular regulation of CYP450 expression in select organisms.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Toxicology
          Toxicology
          Elsevier BV
          1879-3185
          0300-483X
          Jan 15 2017
          : 375
          Affiliations
          [1 ] University of South Bohemia in Ceske Budejovice, Faculty of Fisheries and Protection of Waters, South Bohemian Research Center of Aquaculture and Biodiversity of Hydrocenoses, Zatisi 728/II, 389 25 Vodnany, Czechia. Electronic address: vburkina@frov.jcu.cz.
          [2 ] Department of Food Science, Aarhus University, P.O. Box 50, DK-8830 Tjele, Denmark. Electronic address: Martink.rasmussen@food.au.dk.
          [3 ] Department of Food Science, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala BioCenter, P.O. Box 7051, SE-750 07 Uppsala, Sweden. Electronic address: nadezhola.pilipenko@slu.se.
          [4 ] University of South Bohemia in Ceske Budejovice, Faculty of Fisheries and Protection of Waters, South Bohemian Research Center of Aquaculture and Biodiversity of Hydrocenoses, Zatisi 728/II, 389 25 Vodnany, Czechia; Department of Food Science, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala BioCenter, P.O. Box 7051, SE-750 07 Uppsala, Sweden. Electronic address: Galia.Zamaratskaia@slu.se.
          Article
          S0300-483X(16)30293-1
          10.1016/j.tox.2016.11.014
          27884721
          e4502061-1464-4ad2-a47e-c42c7eb6ed36
          History

          Comparison,Detoxification,Drug,Model organism,Pollution
          Comparison, Detoxification, Drug, Model organism, Pollution

          Comments

          Comment on this article

          scite_
          0
          0
          0
          0
          Smart Citations
          0
          0
          0
          0
          Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
          View Citations

          See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

          scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

          Similar content469

          Cited by18