6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      New Author Guidelines for Displaying Data and Reporting Data Analysis and Statistical Methods in Experimental Biology

      , ,
      Molecular Pharmacology
      American Society for Pharmacology & Experimental Therapeutics (ASPET)

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics has revised the Instructions to Authors for Drug Metabolism and Disposition, Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, and Molecular Pharmacology These revisions relate to data analysis (including statistical analysis) and reporting but do not tell investigators how to design and perform their experiments. Their overall focus is on greater granularity in the description of what has been done and found. Key recommendations include the need to differentiate between preplanned, hypothesis-testing, and exploratory experiments or studies; explanations of whether key elements of study design, such as sample size and choice of specific statistical tests, had been specified before any data were obtained or adapted thereafter; and explanations of whether any outliers (data points or entire experiments) were eliminated and when the rules for doing so had been defined. Variability should be described by S.D. or interquartile range, and precision should be described by confidence intervals; S.E. should not be used. P values should be used sparingly; in most cases, reporting differences or ratios (effect sizes) with their confidence intervals will be preferred. Depiction of data in figures should provide as much granularity as possible, e.g., by replacing bar graphs with scatter plots wherever feasible and violin or box-and-whisker plots when not. This editorial explains the revisions and the underlying scientific rationale. We believe that these revised guidelines will lead to a less biased and more transparent reporting of research findings.

          Related collections

          Most cited references22

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          The ASA's Statement onp-Values: Context, Process, and Purpose

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Experimental design and analysis and their reporting II: updated and simplified guidance for authors and peer reviewers.

            This article updates the guidance published in 2015 for authors submitting papers to British Journal of Pharmacology (Curtis et al., 2015) and is intended to provide the rubric for peer review. Thus, it is directed towards authors, reviewers and editors. Explanations for many of the requirements were outlined previously and are not restated here. The new guidelines are intended to replace those published previously. The guidelines have been simplified for ease of understanding by authors, to make it more straightforward for peer reviewers to check compliance and to facilitate the curation of the journal's efforts to improve standards.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              The Abuse of Power

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Molecular Pharmacology
                Mol Pharmacol
                American Society for Pharmacology & Experimental Therapeutics (ASPET)
                0026-895X
                1521-0111
                December 27 2019
                January 2020
                December 27 2019
                January 2020
                : 97
                : 1
                : 49-60
                Article
                10.1124/mol.119.118927
                31882404
                e3259468-6dcd-4a6c-8cd4-4fdf8328fe8d
                © 2020
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                108
                1
                71
                0
                Smart Citations
                108
                1
                71
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content1,495

                Cited by41

                Most referenced authors791