0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Brain MRI dataset of multiple sclerosis with consensus manual lesion segmentation and patient meta information

      data-paper

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) provides a significant key to diagnose and monitor the progression of multiple sclerosis (MS) disease. Manual MS-lesion segmentation, expanded disability status scale (EDSS) and patient's meta information can provide a gold standard for research in terms of automated MS-lesion quantification, automated EDSS prediction and identification of the correlation between MS-lesion and patient disability. In this dataset, we provide a novel multi-sequence MRI dataset of 60 MS patients with consensus manual lesion segmentation, EDSS, general patient information and clinical information. On this dataset, three radiologists and neurologist experts segmented and validated the manual MS-lesion segmentation for three MRI sequences T1-weighted, T2-weighted and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR). The dataset can be used to study the relationship between MS-lesion, EDSS and patient clinical information. Furthermore, it also can be used for the development of automated MS-lesion segmentation, patient disability prediction using MRI and correlation analysis between patient disability and MRI brain abnormalities include MS lesion location, size, number and type.

          Related collections

          Most cited references3

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis: an expanded disability status scale (EDSS).

          J. Kurtzke (1983)
          One method of evaluating the degree of neurologic impairment in MS has been the combination of grades (0 = normal to 5 or 6 = maximal impairment) within 8 Functional Systems (FS) and an overall Disability Status Scale (DSS) that had steps from 0 (normal) to 10 (death due to MS). A new Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) is presented, with each of the former steps (1,2,3 . . . 9) now divided into two (1.0, 1.5, 2.0 . . . 9.5). The lower portion is obligatorily defined by Functional System grades. The FS are Pyramidal, Cerebellar, Brain Stem, Sensory, Bowel & Bladder, Visual, Cerebral, and Other; the Sensory and Bowel & Bladder Systems have been revised. Patterns of FS and relations of FS by type and grade to the DSS are demonstrated.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Systematic literature review and validity evaluation of the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) and the Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite (MSFC) in patients with multiple sclerosis

            Background There are a number of instruments that describe severity and progression of multiple sclerosis and they are increasingly used as endpoints to assess the effectiveness of therapeutic interventions. We examined to what extent the psychometric properties of two accepted instruments – EDSS and MSFC – meet methodological standards and the value they have in clinical trials. Methods We conducted a systematic literature search in relevant databases [MEDLINE (PubMed), ISI Web of Science, EMBASE, PsycINFO & PSYNDEX, CINAHL] yielding 3,860 results. Relevant full-text publications were identified using abstract and then full-text reviews, and the literature was reviewed. Results For evaluation of psychometric properties (validity, reliability, sensitivity of change) of EDSS and MSFC, 120 relevant full-text publications were identified, 54 of them assessed the EDSS, 26 the MSFC and 40 included both instruments. The EDSS has some documented weaknesses in reliability and sensitivity to change. The main limitations of the MSFC are learning effects and the z-scores method used to calculate the total score. However, the methodological criterion of validity applies sufficiently for both instruments. For use in clinical studies, we found the EDSS to be preferred as a primary and secondary outcome measure in recent studies (50 EDSS, 9 MSFC). Conclusions Recognizing their strengths and weaknesses, both EDSS and MSFC are suitable to detect the effectiveness of clinical interventions and to monitor disease progression. Almost all publications identify the EDSS as the most widely used tool to measure disease outcomes in clinical trials. Despite some limitations, both instruments are accepted as endpoints and neither are discussed as surrogate parameters in identified publications. A great advantage of the EDSS is its international acceptance (e.g. by EMA) as a primary endpoint in clinical trials and its broad use in trials, enabling cross-study comparisons.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Neurostatus and EDSS Calculation with Cases

              Sedat Sen (2018)
              Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) is the most commonly used disability scale for multiple sclerosis (MS) patients. It provides effective and reliable evaluation at every stage of the disease. It is mainly based on the evaluation of functional systems. Neurostatus provides an up-to-date and improved basis for EDSS assessment.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Data Brief
                Data Brief
                Data in Brief
                Elsevier
                2352-3409
                07 April 2022
                June 2022
                07 April 2022
                : 42
                : 108139
                Affiliations
                [a ]Department of Computer Science, Dijlah University College, Baghdad, Iraq
                [b ]Department of Computer and Communication System Engineering, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang, Malaysia
                [c ]Department of Neurology, Baghdad University, Baghdad, Iraq
                [d ]Department of Imaging, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang, Malaysia
                [e ]Department of Radiology and Medical Imaging, Elias Emergency University Hospital, Bucharest, Romania
                Author notes
                [* ]Corresponding author. syamsiah@ 123456upm.edu.my
                Article
                S2352-3409(22)00347-X 108139
                10.1016/j.dib.2022.108139
                9043670
                35496484
                e2d4313c-580a-46b1-8c55-845194aa682a
                © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc.

                This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 2 September 2021
                : 30 March 2022
                : 1 April 2022
                Categories
                Data Article

                expanded disability status scale (edss),automated ms-lesion segmentation,lesion masks,gold standard,ground truth data,t1-weighted,t2-weighted and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (flair)

                Comments

                Comment on this article