0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Developing and validating a clinlabomics-based machine-learning model for early detection of retinal detachment in patients with high myopia

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Retinal detachment (RD) is a vision-threatening disorder of significant severity. Individuals with high myopia (HM) face a 2 to 6 times higher risk of developing RD compared to non-myopes. The timely identification of high myopia-related retinal detachment (HMRD) is crucial for effective treatment and prevention of additional vision impairment. Consequently, our objective was to streamline and validate a machine-learning model based on clinical laboratory omics (clinlabomics) for the early detection of RD in HM patients.

          Methods

          We extracted clinlabomics data from the electronic health records for 24,440 HM and 5607 HMRD between 2015 and 2022. Lasso regression analysis assessed fifty-nine variables, excluding collinear variables (variance inflation factor > 10). Four models based on random forest, gradient boosting machine (GBM), generalized linear model, and Deep Learning Model were trained for HMRD diagnosis and employed for internal validation. An external test of the models was done. Three random data sets were further processed to validate the performance of the diagnostic model. The primary outcomes were the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and the area under the precision-recall curve (AUCPR) to diagnose HMRD.

          Results

          Nine variables were selected by all models. Given the AUC and AUCPR values across the different sets, the GBM model was chosen as the final diagnostic model. The GBM model had an AUC of 0.8550 (95%CI = 0.8322–0.8967) and an AUCPR of 0.5584 (95%CI = 0.5250–0.5879) in the training set. The AUC and AUCPR in the internal validation were 0.8405 (95%CI = 0.8060–0.8966) and 0.5355 (95%CI = 0.4988–0.5732). During the external test evaluation, it reached an AUC of 0.7579 (95%CI = 0.7340–0.7840) and an AUCPR of 0.5587 (95%CI = 0.5345–0.5880). A similar discriminative capacity was observed in the three random data sets. The GBM model was well-calibrated across all the sets. The GBM-RD model was implemented into a web application that provides risk prediction for HM individuals.

          Conclusion

          GBM algorithms based on nine features successfully predicted the diagnosis of RD in patients with HM, which will help ophthalmologists to establish a preliminary diagnosis and to improve diagnostic accuracy in the clinic.

          Supplementary Information

          The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12967-024-05131-9.

          Related collections

          Most cited references43

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Global Prevalence of Myopia and High Myopia and Temporal Trends from 2000 through 2050.

          Myopia is a common cause of vision loss, with uncorrected myopia the leading cause of distance vision impairment globally. Individual studies show variations in the prevalence of myopia and high myopia between regions and ethnic groups, and there continues to be uncertainty regarding increasing prevalence of myopia.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD Statement

            Prediction models are developed to aid health care providers in estimating the probability or risk that a specific disease or condition is present (diagnostic models) or that a specific event will occur in the future (prognostic models), to inform their decision making. However, the overwhelming evidence shows that the quality of reporting of prediction model studies is poor. Only with full and clear reporting of information on all aspects of a prediction model can risk of bias and potential usefulness of prediction models be adequately assessed. The Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis (TRIPOD) Initiative developed a set of recommendations for the reporting of studies developing, validating, or updating a prediction model, whether for diagnostic or prognostic purposes. This article describes how the TRIPOD Statement was developed. An extensive list of items based on a review of the literature was created, which was reduced after a Web-based survey and revised during a 3-day meeting in June 2011 with methodologists, health care professionals, and journal editors. The list was refined during several meetings of the steering group and in e-mail discussions with the wider group of TRIPOD contributors. The resulting TRIPOD Statement is a checklist of 22 items, deemed essential for transparent reporting of a prediction model study. The TRIPOD Statement aims to improve the transparency of the reporting of a prediction model study regardless of the study methods used. The TRIPOD Statement is best used in conjunction with the TRIPOD explanation and elaboration document. To aid the editorial process and readers of prediction model studies, it is recommended that authors include a completed checklist in their submission (also available at www.tripod-statement.org). Editors’ note: In order to encourage dissemination of the TRIPOD Statement, this article is freely accessible on the Annals of Internal Medicine Web site (www.annals.org) and will be also published in BJOG, British Journal of Cancer, British Journal of Surgery, BMC Medicine, British Medical Journal, Circulation, Diabetic Medicine, European Journal of Clinical Investigation, European Urology, and Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. The authors jointly hold the copyright of this article. An accompanying Explanation and Elaboration article is freely available only on www.annals.org; Annals of Internal Medicine holds copyright for that article.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Deep learning for healthcare: review, opportunities and challenges.

              Gaining knowledge and actionable insights from complex, high-dimensional and heterogeneous biomedical data remains a key challenge in transforming health care. Various types of data have been emerging in modern biomedical research, including electronic health records, imaging, -omics, sensor data and text, which are complex, heterogeneous, poorly annotated and generally unstructured. Traditional data mining and statistical learning approaches typically need to first perform feature engineering to obtain effective and more robust features from those data, and then build prediction or clustering models on top of them. There are lots of challenges on both steps in a scenario of complicated data and lacking of sufficient domain knowledge. The latest advances in deep learning technologies provide new effective paradigms to obtain end-to-end learning models from complex data. In this article, we review the recent literature on applying deep learning technologies to advance the health care domain. Based on the analyzed work, we suggest that deep learning approaches could be the vehicle for translating big biomedical data into improved human health. However, we also note limitations and needs for improved methods development and applications, especially in terms of ease-of-understanding for domain experts and citizen scientists. We discuss such challenges and suggest developing holistic and meaningful interpretable architectures to bridge deep learning models and human interpretability.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                xzxsh@sina.com
                wgkjyk@aliyun.com
                doctzhouxingtao@163.com
                Journal
                J Transl Med
                J Transl Med
                Journal of Translational Medicine
                BioMed Central (London )
                1479-5876
                30 April 2024
                30 April 2024
                2024
                : 22
                : 405
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.8547.e, ISNI 0000 0001 0125 2443, Department of Clinical Laboratory, Eye & ENT Hospital, Shanghai Medical College, , Fudan University, ; Shanghai, China
                [2 ]GRID grid.411079.a, ISNI 0000 0004 1757 8722, Department of Ophthalmology and Optometry, , Fudan University Eye Ear Nose and Throat Hospital, ; Shanghai, China
                [3 ]NHC Key Laboratory of Myopia (Fudan University), ( https://ror.org/013q1eq08) Shanghai, China
                [4 ]Key Laboratory of Myopia, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, ( https://ror.org/02drdmm93) Shanghai, 200031 China
                [5 ]GRID grid.411079.a, ISNI 0000 0004 1757 8722, Shanghai Research Center of Ophthalmology and Optometry, ; Shanghai, China
                [6 ]Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Laser and Autostereoscopic 3D for Vision Care, Shanghai, China
                [7 ]GRID grid.8547.e, ISNI 0000 0001 0125 2443, Department of Clinical Laboratory, Shanghai Xuhui Central Hospital, , Fudan University, ; Shanghai, China
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6443-740X
                Article
                5131
                10.1186/s12967-024-05131-9
                11061938
                38689321
                cb703c9c-2d82-409b-964d-943b90b9b8ff
                © The Author(s) 2024

                Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

                History
                : 23 July 2023
                : 26 March 2024
                Categories
                Research
                Custom metadata
                © BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2024

                Medicine
                retinal detachment,high myopia,clinlabomics,machine-learning,detection
                Medicine
                retinal detachment, high myopia, clinlabomics, machine-learning, detection

                Comments

                Comment on this article