Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
13
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Randomized phase III trial on trabectedin (ET-743) single agent versus clinician’s choice chemotherapy in recurrent ovarian, primary peritoneal, or fallopian tube cancers of BRCA-mutated or BRCAness phenotype patients (MITO23).

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          LBA5504

          Background: Trabectedin demonstrated antitumor activity when administered as single agent in relapsed platinum sensitive ovarian cancer (OC), with an overall response rate (ORR) ranging from 26 to 43% and a median PFS of 5 months. In addition, trabectedin showed 39.4% RR, 4.5 months median progression free survival (PFS) and 18 months median overall survival (OS) in a single arm phase 2 trial in recurrent BRCA mutated and/or the BRCAness phenotype OC patients. Methods: In this open-label, phase III, randomized trial, we assigned recurrent OC patients harboring BRCA 1/2 mutations or with BRCAness phenotype (defined as patients who had received and responded to at least 2 previous platinum-based treatments) to receive trabectedin 1.3 mg/mq q 21d or physician’s choice chemotherapy (among carboplatin, gemcitabine, weekly paclitaxel, pegylated liposomal doxorubicine or topotecan). The primary endpoint was OS. Secondary endpoints were PFS, ORR and Duration of Response (DoR). The sample size was calculated based on the assumption that trabectedin would increase median OS from 10 to 15 months (two-sided log-rank test at the error alfa= 0.05 and a power of 80%). Medians and lifetables were computed using the Kaplan-Meier method and analyzed using the log-rank test. Cox proportional hazards model was used to assess the effect of treatment. Results: Two hundred and forty-four patients were randomized and analyzed based on the intent-to-treat principle. At a median follow up of 40 months, the median PFS was 4.4 and 4.9 months (HR= 1.03 p=0.848) and median OS was 17.9 and 15.8 months (HR=1.15 p=0.304), in the control and experimental arm, respectively. ORR was 20.2% in the group of patients receiving standard chemotherapies and 15.4% in the group of patients treated with trabectedin. No superior effect was reported for Trabectedin in the pre-specified sub-group analysis according to BRCA mutational status, type of chemotherapy and platinum-free interval. No new signal of toxicity were reported for all the chemotherapies employed. Conclusions: Trabectedin as single agent does not improve survival outcomes when compared to standard chemotherapy in BRCA mut and BRCAness phenotype OC patients. Clinical trial information: NCT02993705.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Journal of Clinical Oncology
          JCO
          American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
          0732-183X
          1527-7755
          June 10 2022
          June 10 2022
          : 40
          : 17_suppl
          : LBA5504
          Affiliations
          [1 ]Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS Università Cattolica, Rome, Italy;
          [2 ]Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori Milan, Milan, Italy;
          [3 ]Ospedale Umberto I, Turin, Italy;
          [4 ]Gynecologic Oncology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS and Università degli Studi di Milano Bicocca, Milan, Italy;
          [5 ]National Cancer Institute, IRCCS, “Fondazione G. Pascale”, and MITO, Naples, Italy;
          [6 ]Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo-University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy;
          [7 ]Azienda Ospedaliera 'Spedali Civili' Di Brescia, Brescia, Italy;
          [8 ]U.O. Oncologia, P.O. Ospedale degli Infermi – AUSL, Ravenna, Italy;
          [9 ]Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy;
          [10 ]IRCCS Az. San Martino, Genova, Italy;
          [11 ]IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori”, Meldola, Italy;
          [12 ]Department of Oncology Mater Salutis Hospital, Legnago, Italy;
          [13 ]Azenda Ospedaliera Perugia, Perugia, Italy;
          [14 ]MITO and Fatebenefratelli Hospital, Rome, Italy;
          [15 ]Ulss 2 Marca Trevigiana, Treviso, Italy;
          [16 ]Royal Marsden Hospital, London, United Kingdom;
          [17 ]Oncology Department, Azienda USL della Romagna, Ravenna, Italy;
          [18 ]Cancer Center, Trieste, Italy;
          [19 ]Clinical Oncology, Department of Morphology, Surgery and Experimental Medicine, S Anna University Hospital, Ferrara, Italy;
          [20 ]Fondazione Policlinico Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy;
          Article
          10.1200/JCO.2022.40.17_suppl.LBA5504
          e2cfe358-1dba-4863-b1ef-fd2211b0bfc2
          © 2022
          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article

          scite_
          0
          0
          0
          0
          Smart Citations
          0
          0
          0
          0
          Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
          View Citations

          See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

          scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

          Similar content189

          Cited by3