10
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A Framework for a New Approach to Empower Users Through Low-Cost and Do-It-Yourself Assistive Technology

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background: Assistive Technology (AT) refers to “assistive products and related systems and services developed for people to maintain or improve functioning and thereby to promote well-being”. Improving the process of design and creation of assistive products is an important step towards strengthening AT provision. Purpose: (1) to present a framework for designing and creating Low-Cost AT; (2) to display the preliminary results and evidence derived from applying the framework. Methodology: First, an evidence-based process was applied to develop and conceptualize the framework. Then, a pilot project to validate the framework was carried out. The sample was formed by 11 people with disabilities. The measure instruments were specific questionnaire, several forms of the Matching Person-Technology model, the Psychosocial Impact of Assistive Device Scale, and a tool to assess the usability and universal design of AT. Results: The framework integrates three phases: Identification (Design), Creation (Making the prototype), and Implementation (Outcome Measures), based on the principles of Design Thinking, and with a user-centered perspective. The preliminary results showed the coherence of the entire process and its applicability. The matching between person and device was high, representing the importance of involving the user in the design and selection of AT. Conclusions: The framework is a guide for professionals and users to apply a Low-Cost and Do-It-Yourself perspective to the provision of AT. It highlights the importance of monitoring the entire procedure and measuring the effects, by applying the outcome measures.

          Related collections

          Most cited references46

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The REDCap consortium: Building an international community of software platform partners

          The Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap) data management platform was developed in 2004 to address an institutional need at Vanderbilt University, then shared with a limited number of adopting sites beginning in 2006. Given bi-directional benefit in early sharing experiments, we created a broader consortium sharing and support model for any academic, non-profit, or government partner wishing to adopt the software. Our sharing framework and consortium-based support model have evolved over time along with the size of the consortium (currently more than 3200 REDCap partners across 128 countries). While the "REDCap Consortium" model represents only one example of how to build and disseminate a software platform, lessons learned from our approach may assist other research institutions seeking to build and disseminate innovative technologies.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Predictors of assistive technology abandonment.

            Technology abandonment may have serious repercussions for individuals with disabilities and for society. The purpose of this study was to determine how technology users decide to accept or reject assistive devices. Two hundred twenty-seven adults with various disabilities responded to a survey on device selection, acquisition, performance, and use. Results showed that 29.3% of all devices were completely abandoned. Mobility aids were more frequently abandoned than other categories of devices, and abandonment rates were highest during the first year and after 5 years of use. Four factors were significantly related to abandonment--lack of consideration of user opinion in selection, easy device procurement, poor device performance, and change in user needs or priorities. These findings suggest that technology-related policies and services need to emphasize consumer involvement and long-term needs of consumers to reduce device abandonment and enhance consumer satisfaction.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Maximizing usability: the principles of universal design.

              The Center for Universal Design at North Carolina State University has developed a set of seven Principles of Universal Design that may be used to guide the design process, to evaluate existing or new designs, and to teach students and practitioners. This article presents preceding design guidelines and evaluation criteria, describes the process of developing the Principles, lists The Principles of Universal Design and provides examples of designs that satisfy each, and suggests future developments that would facilitate applying the Principles to assess the usability of all types of products and environments.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Academic Editor
                Journal
                Int J Environ Res Public Health
                Int J Environ Res Public Health
                ijerph
                International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
                MDPI
                1661-7827
                1660-4601
                16 March 2021
                March 2021
                : 18
                : 6
                : 3039
                Affiliations
                [1 ]CITIC, TALIONIS Research Group, Universidade da Coruña, 15071 A Coruña, Spain; javier.pereira@ 123456udc.es
                [2 ]AGAELA (Galician Association of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis), 15670 A Coruña, Spain; jessicagarabal@ 123456gmail.com
                [3 ]COGAMI (Galician Confederation of People with Disabilities), 15704 Santiago de Compostela, Spain; cegadi@ 123456cogami.gal (P.P.T.); cegadi@ 123456cogami.es (O.V.F.); crd.fingoi.terapiaocupacional@ 123456cogami.gal (C.N.D.)
                Author notes
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3356-0429
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9328-0723
                Article
                ijerph-18-03039
                10.3390/ijerph18063039
                8001483
                33809518
                e2c54db4-5067-4d85-be4c-3847d5046b35
                © 2021 by the authors.

                Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 17 February 2021
                : 12 March 2021
                Categories
                Article

                Public health
                framework,do-it-yourself (diy),occupational therapy (ot),assistive technology (at),design,low-cost,outcome measures

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                23
                0
                10
                0
                Smart Citations
                23
                0
                10
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content34

                Cited by7

                Most referenced authors308