19
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Harnessing the Versatility of Bacterial Collagen to Improve the Chondrogenic Potential of Porous Collagen Scaffolds

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Collagen I foams are used in the clinic as scaffolds to promote articular cartilage repair as they provide a bioactive environment for cells with chondrogenic potential. However, collagen I as a base material does not allow for precise control over bioactivity. Alternatively, recombinant bacterial collagens can be used as “blank slate” collagen molecules to offer a versatile platform for incorporation of selected bioactive sequences and fabrication into 3D scaffolds. Here, we show the potential of Streptococcal collagen-like 2 (Scl2) protein foams modified with peptides designed to specifically and noncovalently bind hyaluronic acid and chondroitin sulfate to improve chondrogenesis of human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs) compared to collagen I foams. Specific compositions of functionalized Scl2 foams lead to improved chondrogenesis compared to both nonfunctionalized Scl2 and collagen I foams, as indicated by gene expression, extracellular matrix accumulation, and compression moduli. hMSCs cultured in functionalized Scl2 foams exhibit decreased collagens I and X gene and protein expression, suggesting an advantage over collagen I foams in promoting a chondrocytic phenotype. These highly modular foams can be further modified to improve specific aspects chondrogenesis. As such, these scaffolds also have the potential to be tailored for other regenerative medicine applications.

          Related collections

          Most cited references69

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Tissue engineering.

          The loss or failure of an organ or tissue is one of the most frequent, devastating, and costly problems in human health care. A new field, tissue engineering, applies the principles of biology and engineering to the development of functional substitutes for damaged tissue. This article discusses the foundations and challenges of this interdisciplinary field and its attempts to provide solutions to tissue creation and repair.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Collagen scaffolds for tissue engineering.

            There are two major approaches to tissue engineering for regeneration of tissues and organs. One involves cell-free materials and/or factors and one involves delivering cells to contribute to the regeneraion process. Of the many scaffold materials being investigated, collagen type I, with selective removal of its telopeptides, has been shown to have many advantageous features for both of these approaches. Highly porous collagen lattice sponges have been used to support in vitro growth of many types of tissues. Use of bioreactors to control in vitro perfusion of medium and to apply hydrostatic fluid pressure has been shown to enhance histogenesis in collagen scaffolds. Collagen sponges have also been developed to contain differentiating-inducing materials like demineralized bone to stimulate differentiation of cartilage tissue both in vitro and in vivo.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The effect of matrix stiffness on the differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells in response to TGF-β.

              Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are a valuable cell source for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. Transforming growth factor β (TGF-β) can promote MSC differentiation into either smooth muscle cells (SMCs) or chondrogenic cells. Here we showed that the stiffness of cell adhesion substrates modulated these differential effects. MSCs on soft substrates had less spreading, fewer stress fibers and lower proliferation rate than MSCs on stiff substrates. MSCs on stiff substrates had higher expression of SMC markers α-actin and calponin-1; in contrast, MSCs on soft substrates had a higher expression of chondrogenic marker collagen-II and adipogenic marker lipoprotein lipase (LPL). TGF-β increased SMC marker expression on stiff substrates. However, TGF-β increased chondrogenic marker expression and suppressed adipogenic marker expression on soft substrates, while adipogenic medium and soft substrates induced adipogenic differentiation effectively. Rho GTPase was involved in the expression of all aforementioned lineage markers, but did not account for the differential effects of substrate stiffness. In addition, soft substrates did not significantly affect Rho activity, but inhibited Rho-induced stress fiber formation and α-actin assembly. Further analysis showed that MSCs on soft substrates had weaker cell adhesion, and that the suppression of cell adhesion strength mimicked the effects of soft substrates on the lineage marker expression. These results provide insights of how substrate stiffness differentially regulates stem cell differentiation, and have significant implications for the design of biomaterials with appropriate mechanical property for tissue regeneration. Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                101581613
                40077
                Adv Healthc Mater
                Adv Healthc Mater
                Advanced healthcare materials
                2192-2640
                2192-2659
                21 April 2017
                24 May 2016
                July 2016
                26 April 2017
                : 5
                : 13
                : 1656-1666
                Affiliations
                Department of Materials, Department of Bioengineering, Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Imperial College London SW7 2AZ, UK; The Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) Manufacturing, Bayview Avenue, Clayton, Victoria 3169, Australia
                Department of Bioengineering Institute of Biomedical Engineering Imperial College London, SW7 2AZ, UK
                Department of Bioengineering Institute of Biomedical Engineering Imperial College London, SW7 2AZ, UK
                Department of Bioengineering Institute of Biomedical Engineering Imperial College London, SW7 2AZ, UK
                The Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) Manufacturing, Bayview Avenue, Clayton, Victoria 3169, Australia
                The Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) Manufacturing, Bayview Avenue, Clayton, Victoria 3169, Australia
                The Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) Manufacturing, Bayview Avenue, Clayton, Victoria 3169, Australia
                The Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) Manufacturing, Bayview Avenue, Clayton, Victoria 3169, Australia
                Department of Bioengineering Institute of Biomedical Engineering Imperial College London, SW7 2AZ, UK
                Author notes
                Article
                EMS72406
                10.1002/adhm.201600136
                5405340
                27219220
                df7c5c94-0199-4eac-9a8f-eaae8497d00b

                This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                Categories
                Article

                Comments

                Comment on this article