8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      The internal quality control in the traceability era

      1 , 1 , 1 , 1
      Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)
      Walter de Gruyter GmbH

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          To be accurate and equivalent, laboratory results should be traceable to higher-order references. Furthermore, their quality should fulfill acceptable measurement uncertainty (MU) as defined to fit the intended clinical use. With this aim, in vitro diagnostics (IVD) manufacturers should define a calibration hierarchy to assign traceable values to their system calibrators. Medical laboratories should know and verify how manufacturers have implemented the traceability of their calibrators and estimate the corresponding MU on clinical samples. Accordingly, the internal quality control (IQC) program should be redesigned to permit IVD traceability surveillance through the verification by medical laboratories that control materials, provided by the manufacturer as a part of measuring systems, are in the clinically suitable validation range (IQC component I). Separately, laboratories should also monitor the reliability of employed IVD measuring systems through the IQC component II, devoted to estimation of MU due to random effects and to obtaining MU of provided results, in order to apply prompt corrective actions if the performance is worsening when compared to appropriate analytical specifications, thus jeopardizing the clinical validity of test results.

          Related collections

          Most cited references43

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          A multi-rule Shewhart chart for quality control in clinical chemistry.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Defining analytical performance specifications: Consensus Statement from the 1st Strategic Conference of the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Proficiency testing/external quality assessment: current challenges and future directions.

              Proficiency testing (PT), or external quality assessment (EQA), is intended to verify on a recurring basis that laboratory results conform to expectations for the quality required for patient care. Key factors for interpreting PT/EQA results are knowledge of the commutability of the samples used and the process used for target value assignment. A commutable PT/EQA sample demonstrates the same numeric relationship between different measurement procedures as that expected for patients' samples. Noncommutable PT/EQA samples frequently have a matrix-related bias of unknown magnitude that limits interpretation of results. PT/EQA results for commutable samples can be used to assess accuracy against a reference measurement procedure or a designated comparison method. In addition, the agreement of the results between different measurement procedures for commutable samples reflects that which would be seen for patients' samples. PT/EQA results for noncommutable samples must be compared to a peer group mean/median of results from participants who use measurement procedures that are expected to have the same or very similar matrix-related bias. Peer group evaluation is used to asses whether a laboratory is using a measurement procedure in conformance to the manufacturer's specifications and/or in conformance to other laboratories using the same technology. A noncommutable PT/EQA sample does not give meaningful information about the relationship of results for patients' samples between different measurement procedures. PT/EQA provides substantial value to the practice of laboratory medicine by assessing the performance of individual laboratories and, when commutable samples are used, the status of standardization or harmonization among different measurement procedures.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)
                Walter de Gruyter GmbH
                1437-4331
                1434-6621
                February 23 2021
                September 25 2020
                February 01 2021
                February 23 2021
                April 28 2020
                February 01 2021
                : 59
                : 2
                : 291-300
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Research Centre for Metrological Traceability in Laboratory Medicine (CIRME) , University of Milan , Milan , Italy
                Article
                10.1515/cclm-2020-0371
                32639119
                df37a9b2-4102-4f33-8b0c-2ffd85e4c143
                © 2021
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article