18
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Impact of Electronic Medical Record Use on the Patient–Doctor Relationship and Communication: A Systematic Review

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          BACKGROUND

          While Electronic Medical Record (EMR) use has increased dramatically, the EMR’s impact on the patient–doctor relationship remains unclear. This systematic literature review sought to understand the impact of EMR use on patient–doctor relationships and communication.

          METHODS

          Parallel searches in Ovid MEDLINE, PubMed, Scopus, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library, reference review of prior systematic reviews, meeting abstract reviews, and expert reviews from August 2013 to March 2015 were conducted. Medical Subject Heading terms related to EMR use were combined with keyword terms identifying face-to-face patient–doctor communication. English language observational or interventional studies (1995–2015) were included. Studies examining physician attitudes only were excluded. Structured data extraction compared study population, design, data collection method, and outcomes.

          RESULTS

          Fifty-three of 7445 studies reviewed met inclusion criteria. Included studies used behavioral analysis (28) to objectively measure communication behaviors using video or direct observation and pre-post or cross-sectional surveys to examine patient perceptions (25). Objective studies reported EMR communication behaviors that were both potentially negative (i.e., interrupted speech, low rates of screen sharing) and positive (i.e., facilitating questions). Studies examining overall patient perceptions of satisfaction, communication or the patient–doctor relationship ( n = 22) reported no change with EMR use (16); a positive impact (5) or showed mixed results (1). Study quality was not assessable. Small sample sizes limited generalizability. Publication bias may limit findings.

          DISCUSSION

          Despite objective evidence that EMR use may negatively impact patient–doctor communication, studies examining patient perceptions found no change in patient satisfaction or patient–doctor communication. Therefore, our findings should encourage providers to adopt the EMR as a communication tool. Future research is needed to better understand how to enhance patient–doctor- EMR communication. This research should correlate observed physician behavior to patient satisfaction, focus on physician communication skills training, and explore inpatient experiences.

          Electronic supplementary material

          The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s11606-015-3582-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Contributors
          (415) 999 3580 , malkureishi@peds.bsd.uchicago.edu
          Journal
          J Gen Intern Med
          J Gen Intern Med
          Journal of General Internal Medicine
          Springer US (New York )
          0884-8734
          1525-1497
          19 January 2016
          May 2016
          : 31
          : 5
          : 548-560
          Affiliations
          [1 ] GRID grid.170205.1, ISNI 0000000419367822, Department of Academic Pediatrics, , University of Chicago, ; Chicago, IL USA
          [2 ] GRID grid.170205.1, ISNI 0000000419367822, Section of General Internal Medicine, , University of Chicago, ; Chicago, IL USA
          [3 ] GRID grid.170205.1, ISNI 0000000419367822, Section of Hospital Medicine, , University of Chicago, ; Chicago, IL USA
          [4 ] GRID grid.170205.1, ISNI 0000000419367822, , College of the University of Chicago, ; Chicago, IL USA
          [5 ] GRID grid.170205.1, ISNI 0000000419367822, John Crerar Library, , University of Chicago, ; Chicago, IL USA
          Article
          PMC4835363 PMC4835363 4835363 3582
          10.1007/s11606-015-3582-1
          4835363
          26786877
          de1fd355-f716-47d8-9fa6-54bbd4b628bd
          © Society of General Internal Medicine 2016
          History
          : 23 June 2015
          : 7 December 2015
          : 18 December 2015
          Categories
          Review Paper
          Custom metadata
          © Society of General Internal Medicine 2016

          electronic medical records,EMR,patient–doctor relationship,communication

          Comments

          Comment on this article