19
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Pesticides and environmental injustice in the USA: root causes, current regulatory reinforcement and a path forward

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Many environmental pollutants are known to have disproportionate effects on Black, Indigenous and People of Color (BIPOC) as well as communities of low-income and wealth. The reasons for these disproportionate effects are complex and involve hundreds of years of systematic oppression kept in place through structural racism and classism in the USA. Here we analyze the available literature and existing datasets to determine the extent to which disparities in exposure and harm exist for one of the most widespread pollutants in the world – pesticides. Our objective was to identify and discuss not only the historical injustices that have led to these disparities, but also the current laws, policies and regulatory practices that perpetuate them to this day with the ultimate goal of proposing achievable solutions. Disparities in exposures and harms from pesticides are widespread, impacting BIPOC and low-income communities in both rural and urban settings and occurring throughout the entire lifecycle of the pesticide from production to end-use. These disparities are being perpetuated by current laws and regulations through 1) a pesticide safety double standard, 2) inadequate worker protections, and 3) export of dangerous pesticides to developing countries. Racial, ethnic and income disparities are also maintained through policies and regulatory practices that 4) fail to implement environmental justice Executive Orders, 5) fail to account for unintended pesticide use or provide adequate training and support, 6) fail to effectively monitor and follow-up with vulnerable communities post-approval, and 7) fail to implement essential protections for children. Here we’ve identified federal laws, regulations, policies, and practices that allow for disparities in pesticide exposure and harm to remain entrenched in everyday life for environmental justice communities. This is not simply a pesticides issue, but a broader public health and civil rights issue. The true fix is to shift the USA to a more just system based on the Precautionary Principle to prevent harmful pollution exposure to everyone, regardless of skin tone or income. However, there are actions that can be taken within our existing framework in the short term to make our unjust regulatory system work better for everyone.

          Supplementary Information

          The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-022-13057-4.

          Related collections

          Most cited references95

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          The Lancet Commission on pollution and health

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Environmental Justice

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Understanding associations among race, socioeconomic status, and health: Patterns and prospects.

              Race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status (SES) are social categories that capture differential exposure to conditions of life that have health consequences. Race/ethnicity and SES are linked to each other, but race matters for health even after SES is considered. This commentary considers the complex ways in which race combines with SES to affect health. There is a need for greater attention to understanding how risks and resources in the social environment are systematically patterned by race, ethnicity and SES, and how they combine to influence cardiovascular disease and other health outcomes. Future research needs to examine how the levels, timing and accumulation of institutional and interpersonal racism combine with other toxic exposures, over the life-course, to influence the onset and course of illness. There is also an urgent need for research that seeks to build the science base that will identify the multilevel interventions that are likely to enhance the health of all, even while they improve the health of disadvantaged groups more rapidly than the rest of the population so that inequities in health can be reduced and ultimately eliminated. We also need sustained research attention to identifying how to build the political support to reduce the large shortfalls in health. (PsycINFO Database Record
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                ndonley@biologicaldiversity.org
                Journal
                BMC Public Health
                BMC Public Health
                BMC Public Health
                BioMed Central (London )
                1471-2458
                19 April 2022
                19 April 2022
                2022
                : 22
                : 708
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Center for Biological Diversity, Portland, OR USA
                [2 ]GRID grid.264771.1, ISNI 0000 0001 2173 6488, Texas Southern University, ; Houston, TX USA
                [3 ]GRID grid.427176.1, Farmworker Association of Florida, ; Apopka, FL USA
                [4 ]GRID grid.434320.2, Farmworker Justice, ; Washington, DC USA
                [5 ]Advance Carolina, Raleigh, NC USA
                [6 ]GRID grid.429617.f, Migrant Clinicians Network, ; Salisbury, MD USA
                [7 ]Northwest Center for Alternatives to Pesticides, Eugene, OR USA
                [8 ]GRID grid.263934.9, ISNI 0000 0001 2215 2150, Spelman College, ; Atlanta, GA USA
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9935-261X
                Article
                13057
                10.1186/s12889-022-13057-4
                9017009
                35436924
                dc50c43e-8738-4714-8334-87eb571d80b5
                © The Author(s) 2022

                Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

                History
                : 10 December 2021
                : 22 March 2022
                Categories
                Review
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2022

                Public health
                pesticides,agrochemicals,racism,classism,environmental justice,regulation,farmworkers,worker safety,children’s health

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content2

                Cited by9

                Most referenced authors1,005