19
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Taking Opportunities, Taking Medicines: Antibiotic Use in Rural Eastern Uganda

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The ways in which dimensions of health and healthcare intersect with economics and politics in particular contexts requires close attention. In this article we connect concerns about antibiotic overuse in Uganda to the social milieu created through policies that follow President Museveni’s vision for a population who kulembeka, “tap wealth.” Ethnography fieldwork in rural Eastern Uganda illustrates how taking medicines in rural households reflects a wider landscape of everyday imperatives to “tap” opportunities in a context of acute precarity. We argue for a closer connection between medical and economic anthropology to push forward understanding of health, medicines and wellbeing in Africa.

          Related collections

          Most cited references53

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Malaria transmission, infection, and disease at three sites with varied transmission intensity in Uganda: implications for malaria control.

          The intensification of control interventions has led to marked reductions in malaria burden in some settings, but not others. To provide a comprehensive description of malaria epidemiology in Uganda, we conducted surveillance studies over 24 months in 100 houses randomly selected from each of three subcounties: Walukuba (peri-urban), Kihihi (rural), and Nagongera (rural). Annual entomological inoculation rate (aEIR) was estimated from monthly Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) light trap mosquito collections. Children aged 0.5-10 years were provided long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) and followed for measures of parasite prevalence, anemia and malaria incidence. Estimates of aEIR were 2.8, 32.0, and 310 infectious bites per year, and estimates of parasite prevalence 7.4%, 9.3%, and 28.7% for Walukuba, Kihihi, and Nagongera, respectively. Over the 2-year study, malaria incidence per person-years decreased in Walukuba (0.51 versus 0.31, P = 0.001) and increased in Kihihi (0.97 versus 1.93, P < 0.001) and Nagongera (2.33 versus 3.30, P < 0.001). Of 2,582 episodes of malaria, only 8 (0.3%) met criteria for severe disease. The prevalence of anemia was low and not associated with transmission intensity. In our cohorts, where LLINs and prompt effective treatment were provided, the risk of complicated malaria and anemia was extremely low. However, malaria incidence was high and increased over time at the two rural sites, suggesting improved community-wide coverage of LLIN and additional malaria control interventions are needed in Uganda.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Current accounts of antimicrobial resistance: stabilisation, individualisation and antibiotics as infrastructure

            Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is one of the latest issues to galvanise political and financial investment as an emerging global health threat. This paper explores the construction of AMR as a problem, following three lines of analysis. First, an examination of some of the ways in which AMR has become an object for action—through defining, counting and projecting it. Following Lakoff’s work on emerging infectious diseases, the paper illustrates that while an ‘actuarial’ approach to AMR may be challenging to stabilise due to definitional and logistical issues, it has been successfully stabilised through a ‘sentinel’ approach that emphasises the threat of AMR. Second, the paper draws out a contrast between the way AMR is formulated in terms of a problem of connectedness—a ‘One Health’ issue—and the frequent solutions to AMR being focused on individual behaviour. The paper suggests that AMR presents an opportunity to take seriously connections, scale and systems but that this effort is undermined by the prevailing tendency to reduce health issues to matters for individual responsibility. Third, the paper takes AMR as a moment of infrastructural inversion (Bowker and Star) when antimicrobials and the work they do are rendered more visible. This leads to the proposal of antibiotics as infrastructure—part of the woodwork that we take for granted, and entangled with our ways of doing life, in particular modern life. These explorations render visible the ways social, economic and political frames continue to define AMR and how it may be acted upon, which opens up possibilities for reconfiguring AMR research and action.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Quick fix for care, productivity, hygiene and inequality: reframing the entrenched problem of antibiotic overuse

              Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a major challenge of our time. A key global objective is to reduce antibiotic use (ABU), in order to reduce resistance caused by antimicrobial pressure. This is often set as a ‘behaviour change’ issue, locating intervention efforts in the knowledge and attitudes of individual prescribers and users of medicines. Such approaches have had limited impact and fall short of addressing wider drivers of antibiotic use. To address the magnitude of antibiotic overuse requires a wider lens to view our relationships with these medicines. This article draws on ethnographic research from East Africa to answer the question of what roles antibiotics play beyond their immediate curative effects. We carried out interviews, participant observation and documentary analysis over a decade in northeast Tanzania and eastern and central Uganda. Our findings suggest that antibiotics have become a ‘quick fix’ in our modern societies. They are a quick fix for care in fractured health systems; a quick fix for productivity at local and global scales, for humans, animals and crops; a quick fix for hygiene in settings of minimised resources; and a quick fix for inequality in landscapes scarred by political and economic violence. Conceptualising antibiotic use as a ‘quick fix’ infrastructure shifts attention to the structural dimensions of AMR and antimicrobial use (AMU) and raises our line of sight into the longer term, generating more systemic solutions that have greater chance of achieving equitable impact.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                7707343
                5675
                Med Anthropol
                Med Anthropol
                Medical anthropology
                0145-9740
                1545-5882
                21 March 2023
                May-Jun 2022
                24 March 2022
                27 March 2023
                : 41
                : 4
                : 418-430
                Affiliations
                [a ]Infectious Diseases Research Collaboration, Kampala, Uganda
                [b ]Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
                [c ]Department of Social Anthropology, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
                [d ]Department of Clinical Research, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
                Author notes

                Author contributors

                Data were collected by SN. Analysis was done by SN, CIRC, LDW and SGS. The manuscript was drafted by SN in collaboration with all the other authors. All authors approved the final version of the manuscript.

                CONTACT Susan Nayiga susannaiga@ 123456gmail.com P.O.Box 7475, Plot 2C Nakasero Hill Road, Kampala, Uganda
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1895-4035
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2630-9092
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2505-821X
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6499-7522
                Article
                NIHMS1881822
                10.1080/01459740.2022.2047676
                10040720
                35324360
                db7a85cc-b7bf-4b17-8108-3b97e21d4508

                Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=gmea20

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, and is not altered, transformed, or built upon in any way.

                History
                Categories
                Article

                uganda,medicines,rural,precarity,antibiotics,opportunity
                uganda, medicines, rural, precarity, antibiotics, opportunity

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content440

                Cited by7

                Most referenced authors255