2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Difference in the Surgical Outcome of Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate Patients with and without Pre-Alveolar Bone Graft Orthodontic Treatment

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Presurgical orthodontic treatment before secondary alveolar bone grafting (SABG) is widely performed for cleft lip/palate patients. However, no randomized controlled trial has been published comparing SABG outcomes in patients with, and without, presurgical orthodontic treatment. This randomized, prospective, single-blinded trial was conducted between January 2012 and April 2015 to compare ABG volumes 6 months postoperatively between patients with and without presurgical orthodontic treatment. Twenty-four patients were enrolled and randomized and 22 patients completed follow-up. Patients who had presurgical orthodontics before SABG had significantly improved inclination (p < 0.001) and rotation (p < 0.001) of the central incisor adjacent to the defect, significantly improved ABG fill volume (0.81 ± 0.26 cm 3 at 6 months compared to 0.59 ± 0.22 cm 3; p < 0.05) and less residual alveolar bone defect (0.31 ± 0.08 cm 3 at 6 months compared to s 0.55 ± 0.14 cm 3; p < 0.001) compared to patients who did not have presurgical orthodontic treatment. In conclusion, orthodontic treatment combined with SABG results in superior bone volume when compared with conventional SABG alone.

          Related collections

          Most cited references26

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Secondary bone grafting of residual alveolar and palatal clefts.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Elimination of the residual alveolar cleft by secondary bone grafting and subsequent orthodontic treatment.

            A combined surgical/orthodontic procedure to eliminate the residual alveolar cleft by secondary bone grafting and subsequent orthodontic treatment is described. The operations have been carried out on 378 patients: 240 males and 138 females. Seventy-two patients had bilateral clefts, making a total of 450 grafted clefts. The optimal age for this secondary bone grafting has been found to be 9 to 11 years. In 292 of the cases, the canine had reached its final position in the arch, which allowed a four-group semiquantitative assessment of the newly obtained interdental septum on dental radiographs. The best results have been achieved in cases where the bone graft was carried out prior to the eruption of the canine. In this group, a normal (category I) interdental septal height was achieved in 64 percent and a slightly lower (category II) interdental septum in 32 percent. Interdental septa classified as type I and II are considered to be acceptable. The cleft space was closed in 90 percent of the cases. No significant difference between unilateral and bilateral cases was found. When the same procedure was carried out after eruption of the canine, the results were less favorable.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Secondary bone grafting of alveolar clefts. A surgical/orthodontic treatment enabling a non-prosthodontic rehabilitation in cleft lip and palate patients.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Sci Rep
                Sci Rep
                Scientific Reports
                Nature Publishing Group
                2045-2322
                04 April 2016
                2016
                : 6
                : 23597
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Chemical and Materials Engineering, College of Engineering, Chang Gung University , Taoyuan, Taiwan
                [2 ]Craniofacial Research Center, Department of Medical Research, Department of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery and Department of Craniofacial Orthodontics, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital , Taoyuan, Taiwan
                Author notes
                Article
                srep23597
                10.1038/srep23597
                4819291
                27041697
                d8d89063-4721-4a11-ae97-a67cbbe6b26a
                Copyright © 2016, Macmillan Publishers Limited

                This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

                History
                : 08 October 2015
                : 07 March 2016
                Categories
                Article

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article