15
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Comparison of six different methods to calculate cell densities

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          For in vitro culture of plant and animal cells, one of the critical steps is to adjust the initial cell density. A typical example of this is isolated microspore culture, where specific cell densities have been determined for different species. Out of these ranges, microspore growth is not induced, or is severely reduced. A similar situation occurs in many other plant and animal cell culture systems. Traditionally, researchers have used counting chambers (hemacytometers) to calculate cell densities, but little is still known about their technical advantages. In addition, much less information is available about other, alternative methods. In this work, using isolated eggplant microspore cultures and fluorescent beads (fluorospheres) as experimental systems, we performed a comprehensive comparison of six methods to calculate cell densities: (1) a Neubauer improved hemacytometer, (2) an automated cell counter, (3) a manual-counting method, and three flow cytometry methods based on (4) autofluorescence, (5) propidium iodide staining, and (6) side scattered light (SSC).

          Results

          Our results show that from a technical perspective, hemacytometers are the most reasonable option for cell counting, which may explain their widely spread use. Automated cell counters represent a good compromise between precision and affordability, although with limited accuracy. Finally, the methods based on flow cytometry were, by far, the best in terms of reproducibility and agreement between them, but they showed deficient accuracy and precision.

          Conclusions

          Together, our results show a thorough technical evaluation of each counting method, provide unambiguous arguments to decide which one is the most convenient for the particular case of each laboratory, and in general, shed light into the best way to determine cell densities for in vitro cell cultures. They may have an impact in such a practice not only in the context of microspore culture, but also in any other plant cell culture procedure, or in any process involving particle counting.

          Electronic supplementary material

          The online version of this article (10.1186/s13007-018-0297-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

          Related collections

          Most cited references43

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility.

          L Lin (1989)
          A new reproducibility index is developed and studied. This index is the correlation between the two readings that fall on the 45 degree line through the origin. It is simple to use and possesses desirable properties. The statistical properties of this estimate can be satisfactorily evaluated using an inverse hyperbolic tangent transformation. A Monte Carlo experiment with 5,000 runs was performed to confirm the estimate's validity. An application using actual data is given.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Validation of three viable-cell counting methods: Manual, semi-automated, and automated

            Graphical abstract
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Book Chapter: not found

              Phytoplankton Cell Counting by Flow Cytometry

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                +34 96 387 9047 , seguisim@btc.upv.es
                Journal
                Plant Methods
                Plant Methods
                Plant Methods
                BioMed Central (London )
                1746-4811
                16 April 2018
                16 April 2018
                2018
                : 14
                : 30
                Affiliations
                [1 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1770 5832, GRID grid.157927.f, COMAV - Universitat Politècnica de València, ; CPI, Edificio 8E - Escalera I, Camino de Vera, s/n, 46022 Valencia, Spain
                [2 ]GRID grid.476458.c, Biostatistics Unit – IIS La Fe, ; Valencia, Spain
                [3 ]GRID grid.476458.c, Microscopy Unit – IIS La Fe, ; Valencia, Spain
                [4 ]Present Address: Universidad Regional Amazónica IKIAM, Tena, Ecuador
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7672-4169
                Article
                297
                10.1186/s13007-018-0297-4
                5901878
                29686723
                d7c3b7fc-61a2-4b35-bcfe-e67ac019f80a
                © The Author(s) 2018

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 14 December 2017
                : 2 April 2018
                Funding
                Funded by: Universitat Politècnica de València (ES)
                Award ID: UPV-FE-2013-7
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100007136, Secretaría de Estado de Investigación, Desarrollo e Innovación;
                Award ID: AGL2014-55177-R
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100006527, Dirección General de Investigación Científica y Técnica;
                Award ID: AGL2017-88135-R
                Award Recipient :
                Categories
                Research
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2018

                Plant science & Botany
                automated cell counter,cell counting,flow cytometry,fluorospheres,hemacytometer,image analysis,microscopy,microspore culture

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content114

                Cited by19

                Most referenced authors406