9
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Evaluation of Point-of-care Ultrasound of Airway to Predict Difficult Laryngoscopy and Intubation in Intensive Care Unit Patients

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          A bstract

          Background

          To evaluate the role of ultrasound (US) in the assessment of the airway and to determine whether US has the potential to serve as effective, noninvasive and less time-consuming method for the diagnosis of difficult intubation in ICU patients.

          Patients and methods

          This cross-sectional study was carried in 152 critically ill patients who underwent intubation in the ICU from December 2022 to April 2024. Prior to intubation thyromental height (TMH) and hyomental distance ratio (HMD-R) was measured using a scale and distance from skin to hyoid bone (SHB) and distance from skin to thyrohyoid membrane (STM) was measured using a US. Direct laryngoscopy was performed using a Macintosh blade, and the Cormack–Lehane (CL) grade was noted without external laryngeal manipulation. The laryngoscopy was classified as easy (CL Grade I and II) or difficult (CL Grade III and IV). The number of attempts at intubation, need for alternative difficult intubation approaches or inability to secure the airway was also noted.

          Results

          The incidence of difficult airway was 17.76%. The success rate for first-attempt intubation was 96.7%. Based on the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis cut-off value of 1.97 cm [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.949–0.996, area under the curve (AUC), 0.972] for anterior soft tissue thickness from the skin to thyrohyoid membrane distinguished the difficult intubation group from the easy intubation group, with a sensitivity of 96.3% and specificity of 86.4%. For the hyoid bone level, a cut-off value of 0.905 cm (95% CI, 0.706–0.887, AUC, 0.797) had a sensitivity of 74.1% and specificity of 74.4%. Anterior soft tissue thickness from the skin to thyrohyoid membrane was a better predictor of a difficult airway. There was a significant correlation between clinical airway assessments and US airway assessments.

          Conclusion

          Point-of-care US can serve as an independent tool for assessing the airway in intensive care unit (ICU) patients, with anterior soft tissue thickness from skin to thyrohyoid membrane being a superior predictor. Combined models of sonographic and clinical tests could enhance the diagnostic value for identifying difficult intubation cases in ICU patients.

          How to cite this article

          Mallick S, Das S, Pradhan S, Kar S. Evaluation of Point-of-care Ultrasound of Airway to Predict Difficult Laryngoscopy and Intubation in Intensive Care Unit Patients. Indian J Crit Care Med 2025;29(1):14–20.

          Related collections

          Most cited references23

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Difficult tracheal intubation in obstetrics

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Predicting difficult intubation in apparently normal patients: a meta-analysis of bedside screening test performance.

            The objective of this study was to systematically determine the diagnostic accuracy of bedside tests for predicting difficult intubation in patients with no airway pathology. Thirty-five studies (50,760 patients) were selected from electronic databases. The overall incidence of difficult intubation was 5.8% (95% confidence interval, 4.5-7.5%). Screening tests included the Mallampati oropharyngeal classification, thyromental distance, sternomental distance, mouth opening, and Wilson risk score. Each test yielded poor to moderate sensitivity (20-62%) and moderate to fair specificity (82-97%). The most useful bedside test for prediction was found to be a combination of the Mallampati classification and thyromental distance (positive likelihood ratio, 9.9; 95% confidence interval, 3.1-31.9). Currently available screening tests for difficult intubation have only poor to moderate discriminative power when used alone. Combinations of tests add some incremental diagnostic value in comparison to the value of each test alone. The clinical value of bedside screening tests for predicting difficult intubation remains limited.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Intubation Practices and Adverse Peri-intubation Events in Critically Ill Patients From 29 Countries

              Tracheal intubation is one of the most commonly performed and high-risk interventions in critically ill patients. Limited information is available on adverse peri-intubation events.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Indian J Crit Care Med
                Indian J Crit Care Med
                IJCCM
                Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine : Peer-reviewed, Official Publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine
                Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers
                0972-5229
                1998-359X
                January 2025
                30 December 2024
                : 29
                : 1
                : 14-20
                Affiliations
                [1,2,4 ]Department of Anaesthesiology, Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India
                [3 ]Department of Critical Care Medicine, Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India
                Author notes
                Supriya Kar, Department of Anaesthesiology, Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India, Phone: +91 8895509370, e-mail: Supriya.kar1@ 123456kims.ac.in
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1428-8215
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1550-8144
                https://orcid.org/0009-0004-9260-4190
                https://orcid.org/0009-0001-6235-3018
                Article
                10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24871
                11719556
                39802246
                d7665fdf-a731-4eaf-8ac3-4a59bc75010b
                Copyright © 2025; The Author(s).

                © The Author(s). 2025 Open Access. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and non-commercial reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 21 September 2024
                : 19 November 2024
                Categories
                Original Article

                Emergency medicine & Trauma
                airway ultrasound,difficult airways,intensive care unit
                Emergency medicine & Trauma
                airway ultrasound, difficult airways, intensive care unit

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content429

                Most referenced authors238