0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Optimization of Fluorapatite/Bioactive Glass Nanocomposite Foams as Bone Tissue Scaffold: An in Vivo Study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The present study investigated the suitability of nanocomposite foams of fluorapatite and bioactive glass (FA /BG) in different weight ratios as scaffolds for bone tissue in rat tibia regeneration to determine the optimal composition. FA and BG nano powders with a weight ratio of 25% FA/75% BG (compound 1) and 75% FA/25% BG (compound 2) were used as precursors for gel casting to produce nanocomposite foams. Thirty rats were randomly divided into two equal groups. Disk-shaped samples of each compound were implanted into the tibias of 15 rats. After 15, 30, or 60 days, five rats from each group were sacrificed and subjected to radiological, histopathological, and histomorphometrical examination. Data were analyzed using SPSS software. No foreign body reaction was observed in either group at all intervals, and the bone-biomaterial junction was direct. Overall, the inflammation rate, and the number of blood vessels, osteoblasts, and osteoclasts decreased over time in both groups. However, the number of osteocytes, trabecular bone thickness, and the percentage of new bone formation increased, in contrast to the remaining biomaterial percentage. Most of the changes in the group implanted with compound 2 were significantly more significant and faster than in the other group. Although the composite with the higher percentage of FA was superior to the composite with the higher percentage of BG, considering the results of our previous similar studies, the composite with the same percentage of FA and BG is more favorable to be used as a substitute for bone tissue in the body.

          Related collections

          Most cited references44

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Regenerating bone with bioactive glass scaffolds: A review of in vivo studies in bone defect models.

          Large bone defects resulting from fractures and disease are a medical concern, being often unable to heal spontaneously by the body's repair mechanisms. Bone tissue engineering (BTE) is a promising approach for treating bone defects through providing a template to guide osseous regeneration. 3D scaffolds with microstructure mimicking host bone are necessary in common BTE strategies. Bioactive glasses (BGs) attract researchers' attention as BTE scaffolds as they are osteoconductive and osteoinductive in certain formulations. In vivo animal models allow understanding and evaluation of materials' performance in the complex physiological environment, being an inevitable step before clinical trials. The aim of this paper is to review for the first time published research investigating the in vivo osseous regenerative capacity of 3D BG scaffolds in bone defect animal models, to better understand and evaluate the progress and future outlook of the use of such scaffolds in BTE. The literature analysis reveals that the regenerative capacity of BG scaffolds depends on several factors; including BG composition, fabrication method, scaffold microstructure and pore characteristics, in addition to scaffold pretreatment and whether or not the scaffolds are loaded with growth factors. In addition, animal species selected, defect size and implantation time affect the scaffold in vivo behavior and outcomes. The review of the literature also makes clear the difficulty encountered to compare different types of bioactive glass scaffolds in their bone forming ability. Even considering such limitations of the current state-of-the-art, results generated from animal bone defect models provide an essential source of information to guide the design of BG scaffolds in future.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Processing methods for making porous bioactive glass‐based scaffolds—A state‐of‐the‐art review

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The effect of fluoride contents in fluoridated hydroxyapatite on osteoblast behavior.

              Mei Wei, L-H Qu (2005)
              Fluoridated hydroxyapatite (FHA) discs with various fluoride contents (0-0.567 mol F(-)/mol) [corrected] have been used to investigate the effect of fluoride content on osteoblastic cell behavior. SAOS-3 rat osteosarcoma cells were cultured on FHA discs for different time periods. The cell behavior was examined in terms of cell attachment, proliferation, morphology and differentiation. The fluoride content in FHA discs strongly affected the cell activities. More cell attachment and proliferation were observed on the fluoride-containing FHA discs than on pure hydroxyapatite (HA). The fluoride content also affected the differentiation behavior of osteoblastic cells. Cells on FHA discs demonstrated a higher alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity than those on pure HA after 2 [corrected] weeks of culturing. These results suggested that fluoride ions have a significant impact on different osteoblastic cell activities.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Int J Mol Cell Med
                Int J Mol Cell Med
                IJMCM
                International Journal of Molecular and Cellular Medicine
                Babol University of Medical Sciences (Babol, Iran )
                2251-9637
                2251-9645
                2023
                : 12
                : 4
                : 388-400
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Dental Materials Research Center, Health Research Institute, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran.
                [2 ] Oral Health Research Center, Health Research Institute, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran.
                Author notes
                [* ]Corresponding: Seyedali Seyedmajidi, Address: Dental Materials Research Center, Health Research Institute, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, I.R.Iran. E-mail: s.majidi.dvm@gmail.com
                Article
                10.22088/IJMCM.BUMS.12.4.388
                11240056
                d756f397-4a4a-4a82-9e5c-97ac391e49ad
                © The Author(s).

                This work is published as an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/). Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 24 March 2024
                : 29 April 2024
                : 1 May 2024
                Categories
                Original Article

                fluorapatite,58s bioactive glass,nanocomposite,tissue engineering

                Comments

                Comment on this article