13
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Evaluation of radiomics feature stability in abdominal monoenergetic photon counting CT reconstructions

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Feature stability and standardization remain challenges that impede the clinical implementation of radiomics. This study investigates the potential of spectral reconstructions from photon-counting computed tomography (PCCT) regarding organ-specific radiomics feature stability. Abdominal portal-venous phase PCCT scans of 10 patients in virtual monoenergetic (VM) (keV 40–120 in steps of 10), polyenergetic, virtual non-contrast (VNC), and iodine maps were acquired. Two 2D and 3D segmentations measuring 1 and 2 cm in diameter of the liver, lung, spleen, psoas muscle, subcutaneous fat, and air were obtained for spectral reconstructions. Radiomics features were extracted with pyradiomics. The calculation of feature-specific intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) was performed by comparing all segmentation approaches and organs. Feature-wise and organ-wise correlations were evaluated. Segmentation-resegmentation stability was evaluated by concordance correlation coefficient (CCC). Compared to non-VM, VM-reconstruction features tended to be more stable. For VM reconstructions, 3D 2 cm segmentation showed the highest average ICC with 0.63. Based on a criterion of ≥ 3 stable organs and an ICC of ≥ 0.75, 12—mainly non-first-order features—are shown to be stable between the VM reconstructions. In a segmentation-resegmentation analysis in 3D 2 cm, three features were identified as stable based on a CCC of > 0.6 in ≥ 3 organs in ≥ 6 VM reconstructions. Certain radiomics features vary between monoenergetic reconstructions and depend on the ROI size. Feature stability was also shown to differ between different organs. Yet, glcm_JointEntropy, gldm_GrayLevelNonUniformity, and firstorder_Entropy could be identified as features that could be interpreted as energy-independent and segmentation-resegmentation stable in this PCCT collective. PCCT may support radiomics feature standardization and comparability between sites.

          Related collections

          Most cited references37

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Computational Radiomics System to Decode the Radiographic Phenotype

          Radiomics aims to quantify phenotypic characteristics on medical imaging through the use of automated algorithms. Radiomic artificial intelligence (AI) technology, either based on engineered hard-coded algorithms or deep learning methods, can be used to develop non-invasive imaging-based biomarkers. However, lack of standardized algorithm definitions and image processing severely hampers reproducibility and comparability of results. To address this issue, we developed PyRadiomics , a flexible open-source platform capable of extracting a large panel of engineered features from medical images. PyRadiomics is implemented in Python and can be used standalone or using 3D-Slicer. Here, we discuss the workflow and architecture of PyRadiomics and demonstrate its application in characterizing lung-lesions. Source code, documentation, and examples are publicly available at www.radiomics.io . With this platform, we aim to establish a reference standard for radiomic analyses, provide a tested and maintained resource, and to grow the community of radiomic developers addressing critical needs in cancer research.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            3D Slicer as an image computing platform for the Quantitative Imaging Network.

            Quantitative analysis has tremendous but mostly unrealized potential in healthcare to support objective and accurate interpretation of the clinical imaging. In 2008, the National Cancer Institute began building the Quantitative Imaging Network (QIN) initiative with the goal of advancing quantitative imaging in the context of personalized therapy and evaluation of treatment response. Computerized analysis is an important component contributing to reproducibility and efficiency of the quantitative imaging techniques. The success of quantitative imaging is contingent on robust analysis methods and software tools to bring these methods from bench to bedside. 3D Slicer is a free open-source software application for medical image computing. As a clinical research tool, 3D Slicer is similar to a radiology workstation that supports versatile visualizations but also provides advanced functionality such as automated segmentation and registration for a variety of application domains. Unlike a typical radiology workstation, 3D Slicer is free and is not tied to specific hardware. As a programming platform, 3D Slicer facilitates translation and evaluation of the new quantitative methods by allowing the biomedical researcher to focus on the implementation of the algorithm and providing abstractions for the common tasks of data communication, visualization and user interface development. Compared to other tools that provide aspects of this functionality, 3D Slicer is fully open source and can be readily extended and redistributed. In addition, 3D Slicer is designed to facilitate the development of new functionality in the form of 3D Slicer extensions. In this paper, we present an overview of 3D Slicer as a platform for prototyping, development and evaluation of image analysis tools for clinical research applications. To illustrate the utility of the platform in the scope of QIN, we discuss several use cases of 3D Slicer by the existing QIN teams, and we elaborate on the future directions that can further facilitate development and validation of imaging biomarkers using 3D Slicer. Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The Image Biomarker Standardization Initiative: Standardized Quantitative Radiomics for High-Throughput Image-based Phenotyping

              Background Radiomic features may quantify characteristics present in medical imaging. However, the lack of standardized definitions and validated reference values have hampered clinical use. Purpose To standardize a set of 174 radiomic features. Materials and Methods Radiomic features were assessed in three phases. In phase I, 487 features were derived from the basic set of 174 features. Twenty-five research teams with unique radiomics software implementations computed feature values directly from a digital phantom, without any additional image processing. In phase II, 15 teams computed values for 1347 derived features using a CT image of a patient with lung cancer and predefined image processing configurations. In both phases, consensus among the teams on the validity of tentative reference values was measured through the frequency of the modal value and classified as follows: less than three matches, weak; three to five matches, moderate; six to nine matches, strong; 10 or more matches, very strong. In the final phase (phase III), a public data set of multimodality images (CT, fluorine 18 fluorodeoxyglucose PET, and T1-weighted MRI) from 51 patients with soft-tissue sarcoma was used to prospectively assess reproducibility of standardized features. Results Consensus on reference values was initially weak for 232 of 302 features (76.8%) at phase I and 703 of 1075 features (65.4%) at phase II. At the final iteration, weak consensus remained for only two of 487 features (0.4%) at phase I and 19 of 1347 features (1.4%) at phase II. Strong or better consensus was achieved for 463 of 487 features (95.1%) at phase I and 1220 of 1347 features (90.6%) at phase II. Overall, 169 of 174 features were standardized in the first two phases. In the final validation phase (phase III), most of the 169 standardized features could be excellently reproduced (166 with CT; 164 with PET; and 164 with MRI). Conclusion A set of 169 radiomics features was standardized, which enabled verification and calibration of different radiomics software. © RSNA, 2020 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Kuhl and Truhn in this issue.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                matthias.froelich@medma.uni-heidelberg.de
                Journal
                Sci Rep
                Sci Rep
                Scientific Reports
                Nature Publishing Group UK (London )
                2045-2322
                15 November 2022
                15 November 2022
                2022
                : 12
                : 19594
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.7700.0, ISNI 0000 0001 2190 4373, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Mannheim, , Heidelberg University, ; Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167 Mannheim, Germany
                [2 ]GRID grid.7497.d, ISNI 0000 0004 0492 0584, Department of Radiology, , German Cancer Research Center, ; Im Neuenheimer Feld 230, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
                Article
                22877
                10.1038/s41598-022-22877-8
                9665022
                36379992
                d636ee01-152f-4b1e-b92b-0d48b86eeced
                © The Author(s) 2022

                Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 15 May 2022
                : 20 October 2022
                Funding
                Funded by: Gesundheitsstandort Baden-Wuerttemberg
                Funded by: Medizinische Fakultät Mannheim der Universität Heidelberg (8990)
                Categories
                Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2022

                Uncategorized
                computational models,data processing,image processing,software,medical imaging
                Uncategorized
                computational models, data processing, image processing, software, medical imaging

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content366

                Cited by10

                Most referenced authors754