Background Radiomic features may quantify characteristics present in medical imaging.
However, the lack of standardized definitions and validated reference values have
hampered clinical use. Purpose To standardize a set of 174 radiomic features. Materials
and Methods Radiomic features were assessed in three phases. In phase I, 487 features
were derived from the basic set of 174 features. Twenty-five research teams with unique
radiomics software implementations computed feature values directly from a digital
phantom, without any additional image processing. In phase II, 15 teams computed values
for 1347 derived features using a CT image of a patient with lung cancer and predefined
image processing configurations. In both phases, consensus among the teams on the
validity of tentative reference values was measured through the frequency of the modal
value and classified as follows: less than three matches, weak; three to five matches,
moderate; six to nine matches, strong; 10 or more matches, very strong. In the final
phase (phase III), a public data set of multimodality images (CT, fluorine 18 fluorodeoxyglucose
PET, and T1-weighted MRI) from 51 patients with soft-tissue sarcoma was used to prospectively
assess reproducibility of standardized features. Results Consensus on reference values
was initially weak for 232 of 302 features (76.8%) at phase I and 703 of 1075 features
(65.4%) at phase II. At the final iteration, weak consensus remained for only two
of 487 features (0.4%) at phase I and 19 of 1347 features (1.4%) at phase II. Strong
or better consensus was achieved for 463 of 487 features (95.1%) at phase I and 1220
of 1347 features (90.6%) at phase II. Overall, 169 of 174 features were standardized
in the first two phases. In the final validation phase (phase III), most of the 169
standardized features could be excellently reproduced (166 with CT; 164 with PET;
and 164 with MRI). Conclusion A set of 169 radiomics features was standardized, which
enabled verification and calibration of different radiomics software. © RSNA, 2020
Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial
by Kuhl and Truhn in this issue.