17
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Access and Benefit Sharing Under the Nagoya Protocol— Quo Vadis? Six Latin American Case Studies Assessing Opportunities and Risk

      other

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Global challenges related to access and benefit sharing (ABS) of biological resources have become a key concern in the area of research on herbal medicines, ethnopharmacology, drug discovery, and the development of other high value products for which Intellectual Property protection can be secured. While the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD, Rio 1992) has been recognized as a huge step forward, the implementation of the Nagoya Protocol (NP) and of new forms of collaboration often remain unresolved, especially in the context of “the fair and equitable sharing of benefits arising from the utilization of genetic resources” (Convention on Biological Diversity, 2011). The vision and the specific implementation of this international treaty vary from country to country, which poses additional challenges.

          Aims

          Using a case study approach, in this analysis we aim at understanding the specific opportunities and challenges for implementing international collaborations regarding ABS in six Latin American countries—Chile, Colombia, Guatemala, México, Panama, and Peru. Based on that analysis, we provide recommendations for the path ahead regarding international collaborations under ABS agreements in ethnopharmacological research.

          Results and Discussions

          The implementation of the NP varies in the six countries; and while they are all rich in biodiversity, access and benefit sharing mechanisms differ considerably. There is a need to engage in a consultation process with stakeholders, but this has often come to a halt. Institutional infrastructures to implement national policies are weak, and the level of knowledge about the NP and the CBD within countries remains limited.

          Conclusions

          Different policies in the six countries result in very diverse strategies and opportunities relating to the equitable use of biodiversity. A long-term strategy is required to facilitate a better understanding of the treaties and the resulting opportunities for a fairer development and implementation of transparent national polices, which currently differ in the six countries. So far, the benefits envisioned by the CBD and the NP remain unfulfilled for all stakeholders involved including local communities.

          Related collections

          Most cited references35

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          The Global 200: A Representation Approach to Conserving the Earth's Most Biologically Valuable Ecoregions

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Rapamycin (AY-22,989), a new antifungal antibiotic. II. Fermentation, isolation and characterization.

            Rapamycin is a new antifungal antibiotic produced by Streptomyces hygroscopicus NRRL 5491. It was isolated from the mycelium by solvent extraction, purified by silica gel column chromatography and crystallized as a colorless solid which melts at 183 approximately to 185 degrees C and has the empirical formula C56H89NO14. From its characteristic ultraviolet absorption spectrum rapamycin can be classified as a triene. It is highly active against various Candida species, especially Candida albicans. Its activity is compared with that of amphotericin B, candicidin and nystatin.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Catálogo de las plantas vasculares de Chile

              RESUMEN Se presenta un catálogo de las plantas vasculares que crecen en Chile. Está organizado por divisiones, Pteridophyta (Lycopodiopsida y Polypodiopsida), Pinophyta (Gnetopsida y Pinopsida) y Magnoliophyta (Liliopsida y Magnoliopsida), y dentro de cada grupo, las jerarquías taxonómicas (Familia, Género, Especies y taxones infraespecíficos) están ordenados alfabéticamente. Se incluye además un índice alfabético de géneros con indicación de la familia y grupo a que pertenecen. De acuerdo a este catálogo la flora de las plantas vasculares que crecen en Chile, comprende 186 familias, 1121 géneros y 5471 especies, de éstas, 4655 corresponden a especies nativas, de las cuales 2145 son endémicas de Chile y 816 las especies introducidas.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Pharmacol
                Front Pharmacol
                Front. Pharmacol.
                Frontiers in Pharmacology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1663-9812
                08 June 2020
                2020
                : 11
                : 765
                Affiliations
                [1] 1 Research Group ‘Pharmacognosy and Phytotherapy’, UCL School of Pharmacy, University of London , London, United Kingdom
                [2] 2 Laboratorio de Etnofarmacología, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México , Mexico City, Mexico
                [3] 3 Centro de Estudios en Salud, Universidad del Valle de Guatemala , Guatemala City, Guatemala
                [4] 4 Departamento de Ciencias del Ambiente, Facultad de Química y Biología, Universidad de Santiago de Chile , Santiago, Chile
                [5] 5 Departmento de Investigación, Centro de Rehabilitación de Toxicómanos y de Investigación de Medicinas Tradicionales-Takiwasi , Tarapoto, Peru
                [6] 6 Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos, Alexander von Humboldt, Sede Venado del Oro , Bogotá, Colombia
                [7] 7 Indigena Biodiversity Limited , Gerrards Cross, United Kingdom
                [8] 8 Section of Epidemiology, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Zurich , Zurich, Switzerland
                [9] 9 Institute of Anatomy, University of Zurich , Zurich, Switzerland
                [10] 10 Department of Pharmacy, University of Chieti-Pescara , Chieti Scalo, Italy
                [11] 11 Centro de Biología Celular y Molecular de Enfermedades (CBCMe), Instituto de Investigaciones Científicas y Servicios de Alta Tecnología (INDICASAT AIP) , Panama City, Panamá
                [12] 12 Asociación Nacional de Conservación de la Naturaleza (National Association for the Conservation of Nature) , Cd. de Panama City, Panamá
                Author notes

                Edited by: Lyndy Joy McGaw, University of Pretoria, South Africa

                Reviewed by: Daniel Robinson, University of New South Wales, Australia; David Smith, CAB International, United Kingdom

                *Correspondence: Michael Heinrich, m.heinrich@ 123456ucl.ac.uk

                †Participants in a workshop on Best Practice in Access and Benefit Sharing, held at the UCL School of Pharmacy in October 2019. These authors contributed equally to the paper, based on their expertise in specific aspects of the NP’s implementation

                This article was submitted to Ethnopharmacology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Pharmacology

                Article
                10.3389/fphar.2020.00765
                7294742
                32581783
                d58c0232-5d53-4734-8b9b-d001e6a8f17b
                Copyright © 2020 Heinrich, Scotti, Andrade-Cetto, Berger-Gonzalez, Echeverría, Friso, Garcia-Cardona, Hesketh, Hitziger, Maake, Politi, Spadafora and Spadafora

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 10 March 2020
                : 07 May 2020
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 6, Equations: 0, References: 75, Pages: 19, Words: 14187
                Categories
                Pharmacology
                Policy and Practice Reviews

                Pharmacology & Pharmaceutical medicine
                nagoya protocol,benefit sharing,traditional medicine,access and benefit sharing (abs),natural products,biological resources

                Comments

                Comment on this article