1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Coregulation of tandem duplicate genes slows evolution of subfunctionalization in mammals

      research-article
      1 , 3 , 1 , 2 , 3
      Science (New York, N.Y.)

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Gene duplication is a fundamental process in genome evolution. However, most young duplicates are degraded by loss-of-function mutations, and the factors that allow some duplicate pairs to survive long-term remain controversial. One class of models to explain duplicate retention invokes sub- or neofunctionalization, whereas others focus on sharing of gene dosage. RNA-sequencing data from 46 human and 26 mouse tissues indicate that subfunctionalization of expression evolves slowly and is rare among duplicates that arose within the placental mammals, possibly because tandem duplicates are coregulated by shared genomic elements. Instead, consistent with the dosage-sharing hypothesis, most young duplicates are down-regulated to match expression levels of single-copy genes. Thus, dosage sharing of expression allows for the initial survival of mammalian duplicates, followed by slower functional adaptation enabling long-term preservation.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          0404511
          7473
          Science
          Science
          Science (New York, N.Y.)
          0036-8075
          1095-9203
          12 December 2016
          20 May 2016
          23 December 2016
          : 352
          : 6288
          : 1009-1013
          Affiliations
          [1 ]Department of Genetics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
          [2 ]Department of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
          [3 ]Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
          Author notes
          [* ]Corresponding author. xlan@ 123456stanford.edu (X.L.); pritch@ 123456stanford.edu (J.K.P.)
          Article
          PMC5182070 PMC5182070 5182070 nihpa835310
          10.1126/science.aad8411
          5182070
          27199432
          d4a3f5f8-1f28-45a9-abac-c42d50dc30dd
          History
          Categories
          Article

          Comments

          Comment on this article