4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Recurrence patterns after resection of retroperitoneal sarcomas: An eight-institution study from the US Sarcoma Collaborative

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background and Objectives:

          Resection of primary retroperitoneal sarcomas (RPS) has a high incidence of recurrence. This study aims to identify patterns of recurrence and its impact on overall survival.

          Methods:

          Adult patients with primary retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcomas who underwent resection in 2000–2016 at eight institutions of the US Sarcoma Collaborative were evaluated.

          Results:

          Four hundred and ninety-eight patients were analyzed, with 56.2% (280 of 498) having recurrences. There were 433 recurrences (1–8) in 280 patients with 126 (25.3%) being locoregional, 82 (16.5%) distant, and 72 (14.5%) both locoregional and distant. Multivariate analyses revealed the following: Patient age P = .0002), tumor grade ( P = .02), local recurrence ( P = .0003) and distant recurrence ( P < .0001) were predictors of disease-specific survival. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rate for patients who recurred vs not was 89.6% (standard error [SE] 1.9) vs 93.5% (1.8), 66.0% (3.2) vs 88.4% (2.6), and 51.8% (3.6) vs 83.9% (3.3), respectively, P < .0001. Median survival was 5.3 years for the recurrence vs 11.3+ years for the no recurrence group ( P < .0001). Median survival from the time of recurrence was 2.5 years.

          Conclusions:

          Recurrence after resection of RPS occurs in more than half of patients independently of resection status or perioperative chemotherapy and is equally distributed between locoregional and distant sites. Recurrence is primarily related to tumor biology and is associated with a significant decrease in overall survival.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          0222643
          5286
          J Surg Oncol
          J Surg Oncol
          Journal of surgical oncology
          0022-4790
          1096-9098
          5 September 2019
          27 June 2019
          September 2019
          01 December 2019
          : 120
          : 3
          : 340-347
          Affiliations
          [1 ]Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
          [2 ]Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
          [3 ]Department of Surgery, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California
          [4 ]Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
          [5 ]Department of Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
          [6 ]Department of Surgery, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
          [7 ]Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri
          [8 ]University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin
          [9 ]Department of Biostatistical Sciences, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
          Author notes
          Correspondence: Konstantinos I. Votanopoulos, MD, PhD, FACS, Surgical Oncology Service, Medical Center Blvd, Winston-Salem, NC 27157. kvotanop@ 123456wakehealth.edu
          Author information
          http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6331-327X
          http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7580-9961
          http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8200-3269
          Article
          PMC6743490 PMC6743490 6743490 nihpa1048686
          10.1002/jso.25606
          6743490
          31246290
          d3f1133c-5aed-4dcc-a992-f7c53fe124fb
          History
          Categories
          Article

          predictors,overall survival,local relapse,distant relapse

          Comments

          Comment on this article