0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A qualitative examination on the implementation of participatory “A”rt-based activity on “Health” of older community-dwellers: what worked for the Singapore A-Health Intervention?

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction

          Art and museum-based interventions are gaining increasing recognition for their potential as low-risk activities for older adults, offering numerous physical, cognitive, and emotional benefits. However, there remains a dearth of knowledge regarding the science of implementation as well as the factors and processes that contribute to their effectiveness from the perspectives of intervention participants.

          Methods

          The current research draws on the qualitative evaluation data obtained from a larger mixed-method randomized control trial that evaluated a standardized Participatory “A”rt-Based Activity On “Health” of Older Community-Dwellers—the Singapore A-Health Intervention. Adopting a participatory action research approach, the primary objective is to critically examine the lived experiences and health impact of the Singapore A-Health Intervention with a secondary objective to uncover strategies for optimized implementation outcomes. All 56 participants who completed the intervention filled out a program evaluation survey and a nested sample of 30 participants completed a series of acceptability focus groups.

          Results

          Descriptive analyses of the program evaluation survey data revealed that 96.2% of participants were satisfied with the overall experience of the Singapore A-Health intervention ( M = 9.00, SD = 1.76), reported that the intervention positively impacted their quality of life ( M = 8.90, SD = 1.43), and social wellbeing ( M = 8.92, SD = 1.43). Thematic analysis with a grounded theory approach on the qualitative focus group data revealed three interrelated themes detailing how the Singapore A-Health Intervention contributed to positive health and wellbeing outcomes (1. A-Health Experience, 2. Wellbeing Outcomes, 3. Enabling Factors) and nine subthemes (1a. Intellectual Stimulation, 1b. Positive Stress, 1c. Peer Interaction, 2a. Interpersonal Bonds, 2b. Personal Growth, 2c. Mindful Living, 3a. Integrated Support, 3b. Session Design, 3c. Mode of Engagement).

          Discussion

          This investigation provides important insights to the Singapore A-Health intervention’s effectiveness for enhancing wellbeing among older adults, as well as the factors that enable successful program implementation. These findings offer a culturally unique perspective on the benefits of art and museum interventions, while underscoring the imperative need for strong partnership and collaborations among community stakeholders in supporting the health and wellbeing of ageing populations.

          Related collections

          Most cited references46

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being.

          Carol Ryff (1989)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            An introduction to implementation science for the non-specialist

            Background The movement of evidence-based practices (EBPs) into routine clinical usage is not spontaneous, but requires focused efforts. The field of implementation science has developed to facilitate the spread of EBPs, including both psychosocial and medical interventions for mental and physical health concerns. Discussion The authors aim to introduce implementation science principles to non-specialist investigators, administrators, and policymakers seeking to become familiar with this emerging field. This introduction is based on published literature and the authors’ experience as researchers in the field, as well as extensive service as implementation science grant reviewers. Implementation science is “the scientific study of methods to promote the systematic uptake of research findings and other EBPs into routine practice, and, hence, to improve the quality and effectiveness of health services.” Implementation science is distinct from, but shares characteristics with, both quality improvement and dissemination methods. Implementation studies can be either assess naturalistic variability or measure change in response to planned intervention. Implementation studies typically employ mixed quantitative-qualitative designs, identifying factors that impact uptake across multiple levels, including patient, provider, clinic, facility, organization, and often the broader community and policy environment. Accordingly, implementation science requires a solid grounding in theory and the involvement of trans-disciplinary research teams. Summary The business case for implementation science is clear: As healthcare systems work under increasingly dynamic and resource-constrained conditions, evidence-based strategies are essential in order to ensure that research investments maximize healthcare value and improve public health. Implementation science plays a critical role in supporting these efforts.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being.

              Carol Ryff (1989)
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Med (Lausanne)
                Front Med (Lausanne)
                Front. Med.
                Frontiers in Medicine
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                2296-858X
                19 December 2023
                2023
                : 10
                : 1238563
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Action Research for Community Health (ARCH) Laboratory, Psychology Program, School of Social Sciences, Nanyang Technological University , Singapore, Singapore
                [2] 2Lab4Living, Culture and Creativity Research Institute, Sheffield Hallam University , Sheffield, United Kingdom
                [3] 3National Gallery Singapore, Community and Access , Singapore, Singapore
                [4] 4Research Centre of the Geriatric University Institute of Montreal , Montreal, QC, Canada
                [5] 5Departments of Medicine and Geriatrics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Montreal , Montreal, QC, Canada
                [6] 6Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University , Singapore, Singapore
                [7] 7Palliative Care Centre for Excellence in Research and Education , Singapore, Singapore
                Author notes

                Edited by: Redhwan Ahmed Al-Naggar, National University of Malaysia, Malaysia

                Reviewed by: Tom Kingstone, Keele University, United Kingdom

                Cristiana Furtado Firmino, Escola Superior de Saúde Ribeiro Sanches, Portugal

                *Correspondence: Andy Hau Yan Ho, andyhyho@ 123456ntu.edu.sg
                Article
                10.3389/fmed.2023.1238563
                10766355
                38179279
                d2183a0b-5ce2-4a8c-8b80-06af4c80f309
                Copyright © 2023 Ma, Tan, Goh, Yeo, Teng, Yang, Galéry, Beauchet and Ho.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 12 June 2023
                : 20 November 2023
                Page count
                Figures: 2, Tables: 1, Equations: 0, References: 40, Pages: 12, Words: 9694
                Funding
                This study is jointly funded by the Sir Mortimer B. Davis Jewish General Hospital and Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University.
                Categories
                Medicine
                Original Research
                Custom metadata
                Family Medicine and Primary Care

                participatory arts,museum,social prescribing,wellbeing,older adults,implementation science,qualitative inquiry a-health experience,singapore

                Comments

                Comment on this article