0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Gender differences, academic patenting, and tenure-track reform in China: Evidence from life sciences at elite universities

      research-article
      1 , * , , 1 , 2
      PLOS ONE
      Public Library of Science

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          This study is the first to examine the gender gap in academic patenting among faculty members in Chinese universities, a critical issue for the sustainable development of scientific research and innovation. Using a unique dataset that includes the patenting activities and professional status of 1,836 faculty members in life science-related departments at 36 top Chinese universities, this research reveals an evolving landscape of patenting dynamics. The trend of male faculty members leading in the annual number of patent applications and patents granted has shifted among newly graduated faculty members. Female faculty submit and receive their first patent applications significantly earlier than male faculty. However, male faculty are more likely to be lead inventors, and this gender gap remains difficult to close, with female faculty more likely to be supporting inventors. This research is contextualized within the broader framework of China’s university tenure reform and the growing presence of women in the life sciences. While progress is evident, the study uncovers persistent systemic barriers that prevent women from fully translating their research into patentable innovations. By identifying these social and institutional barriers, our study not only sheds light on the gender gap, but also suggests policy measures to promote gender equity in scientific innovation, making it a critical read for policymakers and academic leaders.

          Related collections

          Most cited references49

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Understanding current causes of women's underrepresentation in science

          Explanations for women's underrepresentation in math-intensive fields of science often focus on sex discrimination in grant and manuscript reviewing, interviewing, and hiring. Claims that women scientists suffer discrimination in these arenas rest on a set of studies undergirding policies and programs aimed at remediation. More recent and robust empiricism, however, fails to support assertions of discrimination in these domains. To better understand women's underrepresentation in math-intensive fields and its causes, we reprise claims of discrimination and their evidentiary bases. Based on a review of the past 20 y of data, we suggest that some of these claims are no longer valid and, if uncritically accepted as current causes of women's lack of progress, can delay or prevent understanding of contemporary determinants of women's underrepresentation. We conclude that differential gendered outcomes in the real world result from differences in resources attributable to choices, whether free or constrained, and that such choices could be influenced and better informed through education if resources were so directed. Thus, the ongoing focus on sex discrimination in reviewing, interviewing, and hiring represents costly, misplaced effort: Society is engaged in the present in solving problems of the past, rather than in addressing meaningful limitations deterring women's participation in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics careers today. Addressing today's causes of underrepresentation requires focusing on education and policy changes that will make institutions responsive to differing biological realities of the sexes. Finally, we suggest potential avenues of intervention to increase gender fairness that accord with current, as opposed to historical, findings.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Sex Differences in Research Productivity: New Evidence about an Old Puzzle

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Gender, Family Characteristics, and Publication Productivity among Scientists

              M. Fox (2005)
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: InvestigationRole: Resources
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Formal analysisRole: Visualization
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS One
                plos
                PLOS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, CA USA )
                1932-6203
                2024
                16 July 2024
                : 19
                : 7
                : e0307165
                Affiliations
                [1 ] College of Law, Southwest University of Finance and Economics, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
                [2 ] Carsgen Therapeutics, Shanghai, China
                Ingenio CSIC-UPV, SPAIN
                Author notes

                Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6739-1881
                Article
                PONE-D-24-11179
                10.1371/journal.pone.0307165
                11251593
                39012865
                d1a5fb40-bcd7-4daf-8af5-b68a9d4c2cdd
                © 2024 Zhang et al

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 20 March 2024
                : 1 July 2024
                Page count
                Figures: 7, Tables: 7, Pages: 22
                Funding
                The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Social Sciences
                Economics
                Labor Economics
                Employment
                Careers
                Social Sciences
                Sociology
                Sexual and Gender Issues
                Science Policy
                Science and Technology Workforce
                Careers in Research
                Scientists
                People and Places
                Population Groupings
                Professions
                Scientists
                Research and Analysis Methods
                Mathematical and Statistical Techniques
                Statistical Methods
                Generalized Linear Model
                Physical Sciences
                Mathematics
                Statistics
                Statistical Methods
                Generalized Linear Model
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Ecology
                Ecology and Environmental Sciences
                Ecology
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Synthetic Biology
                Synthetic Ecology
                Engineering and Technology
                Synthetic Biology
                Synthetic Ecology
                Social Sciences
                Law and Legal Sciences
                Commercial Law
                Patents
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Custom metadata
                Zhang, Xin. patent and gender - Chinese universities. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2024-05-15. https://doi.org/10.3886/E202841V1.

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article