21
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Development and application of a direct method to observe the implant/bone interface using simulated bone

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Primary stability after implant placement is essential for osseointegration. It is important to understand the bone/implant interface for analyzing the influence of implant design on primary stability. In this study rigid polyurethane foam is used as artificial bone to evaluate the bone–implant interface and to identify where the torque is being generated during placement.

          Methods

          Five implant systems—Straumann-Standard (ST), Straumann-Bone Level (BL), Straumann-Tapered Effect (TE), Nobel Biocare-Brånemark MKIII (MK3), and Nobel Biocare-Brånemark MKIV (MK4)—were used for this experiment. Artificial bone blocks were prepared and the implant was installed. After placement, a metal jig and one side artificial bone block were removed and then the implant embedded in the artificial bone was exposed for observing the bone–implant interface. A digital micro-analyzer was used for observing the contact interface.

          Results

          The insertion torque values were 39.35, 23.78, 12.53, 26.35, and 17.79 N cm for MK4, BL, ST, TE, and MK3, respectively. In ST, MK3, TE, MK4, and BL the white layer areas were 61 × 103 μm 2, 37 × 103 μm 2, 103 × 103 μm 2 in the tapered portion and 84 × 03 μm 2 in the parallel portion, 134 × 103 μm 2, and 98 × 103 μm 2 in the tapered portion and 87 × 103 μm 2 in the parallel portion, respectively.

          Conclusions

          The direct observation method of the implant/artificial bone interface is a simple and useful method that enables the identification of the area where implant retention occurs. A white layer at the site of stress concentration during implant placement was identified and the magnitude of the stress was quantitatively estimated. The site where the highest torque occurred was the area from the thread crest to the thread root and the under and lateral aspect of the platform. The artificial bone debris created by the self-tapping blade accumulated in both the cutting chamber and in the space between the threads and artificial bone.

          Related collections

          Most cited references29

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Assessment of implant stability as a prognostic determinant.

          N Meredith (2024)
          This paper aims to establish the parameters necessary to monitor successful implant placement and osseointegration.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The role of primary stability for successful immediate loading of dental implants. A literature review.

            To assess the role of primary stability for successful immediate loading (IL) of dental implants. Original articles studying the role of primary stability for successful immediate loading of dental implants were included. The reference lists of potentially relevant review articles were also sought. The MEDLINE-PubMed databases were searched for appropriate articles addressing the objectives of the present study. Databases were searched from 1979 up to and including April 2010. The search was performed using a variety of keywords in different combinations. Articles published only in English language were included. Letters to the Editor, historical reviews and unpublished articles were not sought. There is a significant biological response by the hard and soft tissues to IL of dental implants. Within the limitations of the present literature review, it is evident that the core issue to observe during IL is the establishment of a good implant primary stability. There is sufficient evidence to suggest that the degree of achieved primary stability during IL protocols is dependent on several factors including bone density and quality, implant shape, design and surface characteristics and surgical technique. Further research is required in situations, such as poor bone quality and quantity and multiple implants or augmentation procedures, which may challenge the attainment of primary stability during IL. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Methods used to assess implant stability: current status.

              Successful osseointegration is a prerequisite for functional dental implants. Continuous monitoring in an objective and quantitative manner is important to determine the status of implant stability. Historically, the gold standard method used to evaluate degree of osseointegration was microscopic or histologic analysis. However, due to the invasiveness of this method and related ethical issues, various other methods of analysis have been proposed: radiographs, cutting torque resistance, reverse torque, modal analysis, and resonance frequency analysis. This review focuses on the methods currently available for the evaluation of implant stability. (More than 50 references.)
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                81-3-3787-1151 , blacklab87@gmail.com
                mshiota.impl@tmd.ac.jp
                fujii.irm@tmd.ac.jp
                sekiyami@dent.showa-u.ac.jp
                ozekishowa@dent.showa-u.ac.jp
                Journal
                Springerplus
                Springerplus
                SpringerPlus
                Springer International Publishing (Cham )
                2193-1801
                21 April 2016
                21 April 2016
                2016
                : 5
                : 494
                Affiliations
                [ ]Department of Implant Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Showa University, 2-1-1 Kitasenzoku Ota-ku, Tokyo, 145-8515 Japan
                [ ]Division of Oral Health Sciences, Department of Masticatory Function Rehabilitation, Oral Implantology and Regenerative Dental Medicine, Graduate School, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, 1-5-45 Yushima, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8510 Japan
                [ ]Dental Implant Clinic, Dental Hospital, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, 1-5-45 Yushima, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8510 Japan
                [ ]Dental Implant Center, Showa Dental Hospital, 2-1-1 Kitasenzoku Ota-ku, Tokyo, 145-8515 Japan
                Article
                2116
                10.1186/s40064-016-2116-6
                4839028
                27186458
                d10dedb3-7083-4e26-b0d8-dfd128452d91
                © Yamaguchi et al. 2016

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

                History
                : 6 January 2016
                : 6 April 2016
                Categories
                Research
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2016

                Uncategorized
                primary stability,implant design,artificial bone,implant/bone interface
                Uncategorized
                primary stability, implant design, artificial bone, implant/bone interface

                Comments

                Comment on this article