30
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      What Drives Productivity Loss in Chronic Rhinosinusitis? A SNOT-22 Subdomain Analysis

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objectives

          Previous studies have shown declines in productivity due to chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) are correlated with disease-specific quality-of-life (QOL) measures. However, it is unclear which symptom domains contribute primarily to productivity loss. This investigation sought to assess the association between CRS-specific QOL subdomain impairment and productivity loss.

          Study Design

          Prospective, multi-institutional, observational cohort study.

          Methods

          198 patients with refractory CRS were enrolled between August, 2012 and June, 2015. Baseline QOL measures were obtained across five subdomains of the 22-item SinoNasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22). Lost productivity time was determined from patient-reported measures of annual absenteeism, presenteeism, and lost leisure time, and then monetized using annual daily wage rates from the 2012 U.S. National Census and 2013 Department of Labor statistics.

          Results

          Productivity losses correlated with impairments in both SNOT-22 psychological dysfunction (Rs=0.428, p<0.001), and sleep dysfunction domain scores (Rs=0.355, p<0.001). Higher SNOT-22 total scores also significantly correlated with increased monetized productivity losses (Rs=0.366, p<0.001). The mean annual productivity cost was $11,820/patient; while patients with comorbid immunodeficiency ($23,285/patient), tobacco use ($23,195/patient), and steroid dependency ($18,910/patient) reported higher than average annual productivity costs. Multivariate linear regression found maximum annual productivity costs in adjusted psychological ($13,300/patient, p<0.001) and sleep dysfunction ($9,275/patient, p<0.001) domains.

          Conclusion

          Impairments in sleep and psychological SNOT-22 domains correlate with productivity losses. Patients with comorbid immunodeficiency, smoking, and steroid dependency had higher than average productivity losses. Targeted management of psychological and sleep dysfunction in combination with standard symptom control may improve patient-centered care and reduce the annual economic burden of CRS.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          8607378
          5476
          Laryngoscope
          Laryngoscope
          The Laryngoscope
          0023-852X
          1531-4995
          10 May 2017
          10 June 2017
          January 2018
          01 January 2019
          : 128
          : 1
          : 23-30
          Affiliations
          [1 ]Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, Division of Rhinology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
          [2 ]Department of Surgery, Division of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery; University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
          Author notes
          Corresponding Author: Timothy L. Smith, MD, MPH, Oregon Health & Science University, Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, Division of Rhinology and Sinus/Skull Base Surgery, Oregon Sinus Center, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Road, PV-01, Portland, OR. 97239, Phone: 503-494-7413, FAX: 503-494-4631, smithtim@ 123456ohsu.edu
          Article
          PMC5723565 PMC5723565 5723565 nihpa875324
          10.1002/lary.26723
          5723565
          28600803
          d0a55b99-af60-4bda-8da0-4aac07516c52
          History
          Categories
          Article

          Sinusitis,Chronic Disease,Cost of Illness,Quality of Life,Paranasal Sinuses,Efficiency

          Comments

          Comment on this article