10
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Financial Hardship Among Pregnant and Postpartum Women in the United States, 2013 to 2018

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Key Points

          Question

          What is the prevalence of financial hardship, including unmet health care need due to cost, health care unaffordability, and general financial stress, among peripartum women in the United States?

          Findings

          This cross-sectional study of 3509 peripartum women, weighted to represent more than 1 million women, found that financial hardship was common: from 2013 to 2018, 24% reported unmet health care needs; 60%, health care unaffordability; and 54%, general financial stress. Private insurance was associated with lower odds of unmet health care need but higher odds of health care unaffordability, and lower household income was associated with higher odds of both unmet health care need and health care unaffordability.

          Meaning

          These findings suggest that financial hardship is highly prevalent among peripartum women, which should prompt policy interventions to promote the economic well-being of families.

          Abstract

          This cross-sectional study evaluates the prevalence of financial hardship, including as unmet health care need due to cost, health care unaffordability, and general financial stress, among peripartum women over time and by insurance type and income.

          Abstract

          Importance

          Financial hardship affects health care access and health outcomes among peripartum women.

          Objective

          To evaluate the prevalence of financial hardship among peripartum women over time and by insurance type and income.

          Design, Setting, and Participants

          This cross-sectional study included peripartum women, defined as women aged 18 to 45 years who reported being currently pregnant or pregnant in the past 12 months, who participated in the National Health Interview Survey from 2013 to 2018. Data were analyzed from January to May 2021.

          Exposures

          Current pregnancy or recent pregnancy as well as insurance type and income.

          Main Outcomes and Measures

          Three measures of financial hardship within the last year were evaluated: (1) unmet health care need due to cost (unmet need for medical care or delayed or deferred medical care due to cost); (2) health care unaffordability (worry about paying for potential medical bills or existing medical debt); and (3) general financial stress (worry about subsistence spending [eg, monthly bills, housing]).

          Results

          The study cohort included 3509 peripartum women, weighted to represent 1 050 789 women (2018: an estimated 36 045 of 184 018 [19.6%] Hispanic, 39 017 [21.2%] Black, and 97 366 [52.9%] White), with a mean (SD) age of 29 (6) years. Overall, from 2013 to 2018, 24.2% (95% CI, 22.6%-26.0%) of peripartum women reported unmet health care need, 60.0% (95% CI, 58.0%-61.9%) reported health care unaffordability, and 54.0% (95% CI, 51.5%-56.5%) reported general financial stress. The prevalence of financial hardship outcomes did not substantially change between 2013 and 2018 (unmet health care need in 2013: 27.9% [95% CI, 24.4%-31.7%]; in 2018: 23.7% [95% CI, 19.5%-28.6%]; health care unaffordability in 2013: 65.7% [95% CI, 61.1%-70.0%]; in 2018: 58.8% [95% CI, 53.4%-64.0%]; general financial stress in 2013: 60.6% [95% CI, 55.2%-65.8%]; in 2018: 53.8% [95% CI, 47.8%-59.8%]). Women with private insurance had lower odds of unmet need (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.67; 95% CI, 0.52-0.87) but higher odds of health care unaffordability (aOR, 1.88; 95% CI, 1.49-2.36) compared with women with public insurance. Peripartum women with household incomes less than 400% of the federal poverty level had higher odds of unmet need (aOR, 1.50; 95% CI, 1.08-2.08) and unaffordable care (aOR, 1.98; 95% CI, 1.54-2.55) compared with those with household incomes 400% or more of federal poverty level.

          Conclusions and Relevance

          These findings suggest that financial hardship among peripartum women in the United States was common from 2013 to 2018, including 24% of pregnant and postpartum women reporting unmet health care need and 60% reporting health care unaffordability. Women with private insurance and those living on lower incomes were more likely to experience unaffordable health care than women with pubic insurance and those with higher incomes, respectively. Targeted policy interventions are needed to improve health care affordability and promote overall economic security among peripartum women.

          Related collections

          Most cited references36

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The high price of debt: household financial debt and its impact on mental and physical health.

          Household financial debt in America has risen dramatically in recent years. While there is evidence that debt is associated with adverse psychological health, its relationship with other health outcomes is relatively unknown. We investigate the associations of multiple indices of financial debt with psychological and general health outcomes among 8400 young adult respondents from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health (Add Health). Our findings show that reporting high financial debt relative to available assets is associated with higher perceived stress and depression, worse self-reported general health, and higher diastolic blood pressure. These associations remain significant when controlling for prior socioeconomic status, psychological and physical health, and other demographic factors. The results suggest that debt is an important socioeconomic determinant of health that should be explored further in social epidemiology research. Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Who gets evicted? Assessing individual, neighborhood, and network factors.

            The prevalence and consequences of eviction have transformed the lived experience of urban poverty in America, yet little is known about why some families avoid eviction while others do not. Applying discrete hazard models to a unique dataset of renters, this study empirically evaluates individual, neighborhood, and social network characteristics that explain disparities in displacement from housing. Family size, job loss, neighborhood crime and eviction rates, and network disadvantage are identified as significant and robust predictors of eviction, net of missed rental payments and other relevant factors. This study advances urban sociology and inequality research and informs policy interventions designed to prevent eviction and stem its consequences.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Women In The United States Experience High Rates Of Coverage ‘Churn’ In Months Before And After Childbirth

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                JAMA Netw Open
                JAMA Netw Open
                JAMA Netw Open
                JAMA Network Open
                American Medical Association
                2574-3805
                29 October 2021
                October 2021
                29 October 2021
                : 4
                : 10
                : e2132103
                Affiliations
                [1 ]National Clinician Scholars Program, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
                [2 ]Department of General Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, California
                [3 ]Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
                [4 ]Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
                [5 ]Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
                [6 ]Division of General Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
                [7 ]Program on Women’s Healthcare Effectiveness Research (PWHER), University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
                Author notes
                Article Information
                Accepted for Publication: August 29, 2021.
                Published: October 29, 2021. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.32103
                Open Access: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License. © 2021 Taylor K et al. JAMA Network Open.
                Corresponding Author: Kathryn Taylor, MD, National Clinician Scholars Program, University of Michigan, 2800 Plymouth Rd, Bldg 14, Room G100, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 ( tkathryn@ 123456med.umich.edu ).
                Author Contributions: Dr Taylor and Ms Kolenic had full access to all of the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.
                Concept and design: Taylor, Compton, Kolenic, Scott, Dalton, Moniz.
                Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: All authors.
                Drafting of the manuscript: Taylor, Compton.
                Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: All authors.
                Statistical analysis: Taylor, Kolenic, Scott.
                Administrative, technical, or material support: Scott, Moniz.
                Supervision: Compton, Scott, Dalton, Moniz.
                Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Dalton reported receiving grant funding from the National Institutes for Health, American Association of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Foundation, the Laura and John Arnold Foundation, National Institute for Reproductive Health, Blue Cross Blue Shield Foundation, the Society of Family Planning, and the Michigan Department of Health and Human Services; being a paid contributing editor for the Medical Letter and an author for UptoDate; serving as a consultant for Bind; serving as an expert witness for Merck; and having participated on study sections for the National Institutes of Health and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality outside the submitted work. Dr Moniz reported receiving personal fees from the RAND Corporation and the Society of Family Planning outside the submitted work. No other disclosures were reported.
                Funding/Support: Dr Taylor was supported by the National Clinician Scholars Program at the University of Michigan. Dr Dalton was supported by grant R01 HS023784 from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Dr Moniz was supported by grant K08 HS025465 from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.
                Role of the Funder/Sponsor: The funders had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.
                Meeting Presentation: Some results from this study were presented at the Annual Meeting of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists; April 30 to May 2, 2021; virtual; and at the Annual Research Meeting of AcademyHealth; June 14 to 17, 2021; virtual.
                Additional Contributions: Brandy Sinco, MA, MS (Department of Surgery, University of Michigan), assisted with data set construction. Sarah Block, BGS (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan), assisted with editing and submission support. Neither received compensation for their role in this study.
                Article
                zoi210912
                10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.32103
                8556621
                34714338
                d0382972-f422-4daf-b6e6-506f736dfc43
                Copyright 2021 Taylor K et al. JAMA Network Open.

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License.

                History
                : 18 June 2021
                : 29 August 2021
                Categories
                Research
                Original Investigation
                Online Only
                Health Policy

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content59

                Cited by16

                Most referenced authors204