0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Comparison study between single enzyme and multienzyme complex in distiller’s dred grains with soluble supplemented diet in broiler chicken

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Upregulation of the nutritional value of feed is the major target of various studies in the livestock industry, and dietary enzyme supplementation could aid in digesting the nondegrading nutrients of grains in feed ingredients. Dried distillers’ grains with solubles (DDGS) is a byproduct of the fermentation process in the beverage industry and can be used as a large supply source of fiber in feed. Therefore, we conducted an experiment with male broiler chickens to investigate the effect of various types of enzymes on DDGS and compare the efficacy of single enzyme and multienzyme complexes on growth performance and gut environments in broiler chickens. We used 420 1-day-old broiler chickens (Ross 308), and they were allotted into 4 dietary treatments with seven replications (CON, corn-soybean meal [SBM] diet; NC, DDGS supplemented diet; SE, 0.05 % of mannanase supplemented DDGS-based diet; MC, 0.10% of multienzyme complex (mannanase and xylanase, glucanase) supplemented DDGS-based diet. The dietary exogenous enzyme in the DDGS-supplemented diet could improve growth performance as much as the growth of the control group, and digestibility of dry matter, crude protein, and gross energy were significantly increased by enzyme addition in groups of chicks fed DDGS-supplementation diet. Moreover, the populations of pathogenic bacteria, coliforms, and Bacteroidetes were significantly decreased by enzyme supplementation, which might lead to improved gut mucus-secreting cells and inflammatory cytokines in the jejunum. Collectively, dietary single enzyme and multienzyme complexes could improve gut environments, including intestinal immune responses and gut microbial population, and lead to improvement of growth performance in broiler chickens.

          Related collections

          Most cited references36

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found
          Is Open Access

          Evaluation of the efficacy of a probiotic containing Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium, Enterococcus, and Pediococcus strains in promoting broiler performance and modulating cecal microflora composition and metabolic activities.

          The aim of this work was to investigate the efficacy of a new multibacterial species probiotic in broiler nutrition. The probiotic contained 2 Lactobacillus strains, 1 Bifidobacterium strain, 1 Enterococcus strain, and 1 Pediococcus strain. Four hundred 1-d-old male Cobb broilers were allocated in 4 experimental treatments for 6 wk. The experimental treatments received a corn-soybean basal diet and were as follows: "control," with no other additions; "probiotic in feed and water," (PFW) with probiotic administered at 1 g/kg of feed for the whole period and in water on scheduled intervals during the first 4 wk; "probiotic in feed," (PF) with probiotic in feed as in PFW; and "antibiotic," (AB) with addition of avilamycin at 2.5 mg/kg of feed. Salinomycin Na was used as a coccidiostat. Each treatment had 5 replicates of 20 broilers. Treatment effects on parameters of broiler performance and cecal microbial ecology were determined. Broiler BW, feed intake, and feed conversion ratio were determined on a weekly and overall basis. Cecal microflora composition, concentration of volatile fatty acids, and activities of 5 bacterial glycolytic enzymes (alpha-galactosidase, beta-galactosidase, alpha-glucosidase, beta-glucosidase, and beta-glucuronidase) were determined at the end of the experiment. Overall, treatment PFW displayed a growth-promoting effect that did not differ from AB. Overall, feed conversion ratio in treatment AB was significantly better (P < or = 0.01) than the control treatment, whereas treatments PFW and PF were intermediate and not different from AB. Concentrations of bacteria belonging to Bifidobacterium spp., Lactobacillus spp., and gram-positive cocci were significantly (P < or = 0.05) higher in treatments PFW and PF compared with the control and AB treatments. Treatments PFW and PF had significantly higher specific activities of alpha-galactosidase and beta-galactosidase compared with the control and AB treatments. In conclusion, probiotic treatment PFW displayed a growth-promoting effect that was comparable to avilamycin treatment. In addition, treatments PFW and PF modulated the composition and, to an extent, the activities of the cecal microflora, resulting in a significant probiotic effect.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Exogenous enzymes in monogastric nutrition — their current value and future benefits

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Enzymes for the feed industry: past, present and future

              M. Choct (2006)
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Anim Sci Technol
                J Anim Sci Technol
                J Anim Sci Technol
                jast
                Journal of Animal Science and Technology
                Korean Society of Animal Sciences and Technology
                2672-0191
                2055-0391
                March 2024
                31 March 2024
                : 66
                : 2
                : 398-411
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Agricultural Biotechnology and Research Institute of Agriculture and Life Science, Seoul National University , Seoul 08826, Korea
                [2 ]Division of Biotechnology, College of Life Science and Biotechnology, Korea University , Seoul 02841, Korea
                [3 ]Department of Basic Science and Craniofacial Biology, New York University College of Dentistry , New York 10012, USA
                Author notes
                [* ] Corresponding author: Younghoon Kim, Department of Agricultural Biotechnology and Research Institute of Agriculture and Life Science, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea., Tel: +82-2-880-4808, E-mail: ykeys2584@ 123456snu.ac.kr

                #These authors contributed equally to this work.

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9832-3251
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3997-1600
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1438-9515
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3764-3339
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0414-7611
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6769-0657
                Article
                jast-66-2-398
                10.5187/jast.2023.e90
                11016744
                38628689
                cf8caf93-56d2-497a-af80-b660c752058a
                © Copyright 2024 Korean Society of Animal Science and Technology

                This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 06 August 2023
                : 28 August 2023
                : 29 August 2023
                Funding
                Funded by: CrossRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100003725, National Research Foundation of Korea;
                Award ID: NRF-2021R1A2C3011051
                Categories
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                2024-04-30

                enzyme,multienzyme complex,growth performance,nutrient digestibility,gut environment,broiler chicken

                Comments

                Comment on this article