5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Syntactic complexity of spoken language in the diagnosis of schizophrenia: A probabilistic Bayes network model

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references78

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Development, reliability and acceptability of a new version of the DSM-IV Social and Occupational Functioning Assessment Scale (SOFAS) to assess routine social functioning.

          Development of a scale to assess patients' social functioning, the Personal and Social Performance scale (PSP). PSP has been developed through focus groups and reliability studies on the basis of the social functioning component of the DSM-IV Social and Occupational Functioning Assessment Scale (SOFAS). The last reliability study was carried out by 39 workers with different professional roles on a sample of 61 psychiatric patients admitted to the rehabilitation unit. Each patient was rated independently on the scale by the two workers who knew them best. The PSP is a 100-point single-item rating scale, subdivided into 10 equal intervals. The ratings are based mainly on the assessment of patient's functioning in four main areas: 1) socially useful activities; 2) personal and social relationships; 3) self-care; and 4) disturbing and aggressive behaviours. Operational criteria to rate the levels of disabilities have been defined for the above-mentioned areas. Excellent inter-rater reliability was also obtained in less educated workers. Compared to SOFAS, PSP has better face validity and psychometric properties. It was found to be an acceptable, quick and valid measure of patients' personal and social functioning.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Automated analysis of free speech predicts psychosis onset in high-risk youths

            Background/Objectives: Psychiatry lacks the objective clinical tests routinely used in other specializations. Novel computerized methods to characterize complex behaviors such as speech could be used to identify and predict psychiatric illness in individuals. AIMS: In this proof-of-principle study, our aim was to test automated speech analyses combined with Machine Learning to predict later psychosis onset in youths at clinical high-risk (CHR) for psychosis. Methods: Thirty-four CHR youths (11 females) had baseline interviews and were assessed quarterly for up to 2.5 years; five transitioned to psychosis. Using automated analysis, transcripts of interviews were evaluated for semantic and syntactic features predicting later psychosis onset. Speech features were fed into a convex hull classification algorithm with leave-one-subject-out cross-validation to assess their predictive value for psychosis outcome. The canonical correlation between the speech features and prodromal symptom ratings was computed. Results: Derived speech features included a Latent Semantic Analysis measure of semantic coherence and two syntactic markers of speech complexity: maximum phrase length and use of determiners (e.g., which). These speech features predicted later psychosis development with 100% accuracy, outperforming classification from clinical interviews. Speech features were significantly correlated with prodromal symptoms. Conclusions: Findings support the utility of automated speech analysis to measure subtle, clinically relevant mental state changes in emergent psychosis. Recent developments in computer science, including natural language processing, could provide the foundation for future development of objective clinical tests for psychiatry.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Cognitive functioning in prodromal psychosis: a meta-analysis.

              A substantial proportion of people at clinical high risk (HR) of psychosis will develop a psychotic disorder over time. Cognitive deficits may predate the onset of psychosis and may be useful as markers of increased vulnerability to illness. To quantitatively examine the cognitive functioning in subjects at HR in the literature to date. Electronic databases were searched until January 2011. All studies reporting cognitive performance in HR subjects were retrieved. Nineteen studies met the inclusion criteria, comprising a total of 1188 HR subjects and 1029 controls. Neurocognitive functioning and social cognition as well as demographic, clinical, and methodological variables were extracted from each publication or obtained directly from its authors. Subjects at HR were impaired relative to controls on tests of general intelligence, executive function, verbal and visual memory, verbal fluency, attention and working memory, and social cognition. Processing speed domain was also affected, although the difference was not statistically significant. Later transition to psychosis was associated with even more marked deficits in the verbal fluency and memory domains. The studies included reported relatively homogeneous findings. There was no publication bias and a sensitivity analysis confirmed the robustness of the core results. The HR state for psychosis is associated with significant and widespread impairments in neurocognitive functioning and social cognition. Subsequent transition to psychosis is particularly associated with deficits in verbal fluency and memory functioning.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Schizophrenia Research
                Schizophrenia Research
                Elsevier BV
                09209964
                June 2022
                June 2022
                Article
                10.1016/j.schres.2022.06.011
                35752547
                cf2e05ee-a2b2-4b04-999f-724640a9dd76
                © 2022

                https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content3,566

                Cited by7

                Most referenced authors793