6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Risk Preference, Health Risk Perception, and Environmental Exposure Nexus: Evidence from Rural Women as Pig Breeders, China

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Rural women are an integral part of the agricultural economy. Still, their exposure to environmental pollution, especially in the context of risk preference and health risk perception, has not gained much attention in the existing literature. So to explore this notion, a survey and experimental data of 714 rural Chinese women as pig breeders are taken, we innovatively evaluate the degree of environmental exposure from the pre-exposure, in-exposure, post-exposure intervention of women breeders, and two-stage least squares (2SLS) method is employed to address the endogeneity issue between health risk perception and environmental exposure. The results show that rural women breeders suffer from severe environmental exposure, and the degree of environmental exposure is up to 72.102( Min = 0, Max = 100). Risk preference also emerges as a crucial determinant behind their environmental exposure, but health risk perception significantly deters the degree of environmental exposure. The health risk perception can offset risk preference effects on women breeders’ environmental exposure by 15.15%. Moreover, considering the heterogeneity of the breeding scale, it is found that the impact of risk preference and health risk perception on women breeders’ environmental exposure is an inverted U-shaped relationship, i.e., the results are at the turning stage when the breeding scale is 31–40 heads. Based on the empirical findings, the study offers guidelines for policymakers to enhance awareness amongst women breeders regarding health and pollution and encourage them to opt for environment-friendly breeding. Moreover, this research also has substantial guiding significance for related research on environmental exposure of rural women in other developing countries.

          Related collections

          Most cited references120

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses.

          G*Power is a free power analysis program for a variety of statistical tests. We present extensions and improvements of the version introduced by Faul, Erdfelder, Lang, and Buchner (2007) in the domain of correlation and regression analyses. In the new version, we have added procedures to analyze the power of tests based on (1) single-sample tetrachoric correlations, (2) comparisons of dependent correlations, (3) bivariate linear regression, (4) multiple linear regression based on the random predictor model, (5) logistic regression, and (6) Poisson regression. We describe these new features and provide a brief introduction to their scope and handling.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Perception of risk

              P Slovic (1987)
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                luqian110203@163.com
                Journal
                Soc Indic Res
                Soc Indic Res
                Social Indicators Research
                Springer Netherlands (Dordrecht )
                0303-8300
                1573-0921
                29 October 2021
                : 1-28
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.440704.3, ISNI 0000 0000 9796 4826, School of Public Administration, , Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology, ; Xi’an, China
                [2 ]GRID grid.144022.1, ISNI 0000 0004 1760 4150, College of Economics and Management, , Northwest A&F University, ; Yangling, China
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2226-9804
                Article
                2837
                10.1007/s11205-021-02837-x
                8553594
                ceff20e5-078c-4dfb-9ea3-7139db0ba461
                © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2021

                This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.

                History
                : 19 October 2021
                Categories
                Original Research

                Public health
                risk preference,health risk perception,environmental exposure,women breeders,experimental economics,2sls

                Comments

                Comment on this article