2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Efficacy of Nicorandil in Preventing Myocardial Injury and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is a common procedure for treating coronary artery disease, but it carries a risk of periprocedural myocardial injury (PMI). This meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy of nicorandil, a hybrid compound with nitrate-like and potassium channel-opening properties, in preventing PMI during PCI. A comprehensive literature search identified 14 studies involving 1,762 patients, with 882 receiving nicorandil and 880 in the control group. The analysis revealed that nicorandil significantly reduced the incidence of PMI (RR: 0.73, 95% CI: 0.61-0.86) and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) (RR: 0.76, 95% CI: 0.58-0.99) compared to the control group. Nicorandil's cardioprotective effects are attributed to its ability to improve coronary blood flow, precondition the myocardium, and reduce oxidative stress and inflammation. These findings suggest that nicorandil could be a valuable adjunctive therapy during PCI, potentially improving patient outcomes. However, the study had limitations, including variations in drug administration methods and a lack of individual-level data for subgroup analysis. Future research should focus on optimizing dosing regimens and administration timing and comparing nicorandil's effectiveness with other cardioprotective agents.

          Related collections

          Most cited references29

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Preconditioning with ischemia: a delay of lethal cell injury in ischemic myocardium.

          Circulation, 74(5), 1124-1136
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Effect of nicorandil on coronary events in patients with stable angina: the Impact Of Nicorandil in Angina (IONA) randomised trial.

            (2002)
            In addition to its anti-ischaemic effects, the antianginal drug nicorandil is thought to have cardioprotective properties. We did a randomised trial to find out whether nicorandil could reduce the frequency of coronary events in men and women with stable angina and additional risk factors. 5126 patients were randomly assigned 20 mg nicorandil twice daily (n=2565) or identical placebo (n=2561) in addition to standard antianginal therapy. The primary composite endpoint was coronary heart disease death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, or unplanned hospital admission for cardiac chest pain. The secondary endpoint was the combined outcome of coronary heart disease death or non-fatal myocardial infarction. Other outcomes reported include all-cause mortality, all cardiovascular events, and acute coronary syndromes. Mean follow-up was 1.6 years (SD 0.5). Analysis was by intention to treat. There were 398 (15.5%) primary endpoint events in the placebo group and 337 (13.1%) in the nicorandil group (hazard ratio 0.83, 95% CI 0.72-0.97; p=0.014). The frequency of the secondary endpoint was not significantly different between the groups (134 events [5.2%] vs 107 events [4.2%]; 0.79, 0.61-1.02; p=0.068). The rate of acute coronary syndromes was 195 (7.6%) in the placebo group and 156 (6.1%) in the nicorandil group (0.79, 0.64-0.98; p=0.028), and the corresponding rates for all cardiovascular events were 436 (17.0%) and 378 (14.7%; 0.86, 0.75-0.98; p=0.027). We showed a significant improvement in outcome due to a reduction in major coronary events by antianginal therapy with nicorandil in patients with stable angina.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Prognostically relevant periprocedural myocardial injury and infarction associated with percutaneous coronary interventions: a Consensus Document of the ESC Working Group on Cellular Biology of the Heart and European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI)

              Abstract A substantial number of chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) experience periprocedural myocardial injury or infarction. Accurate diagnosis of these PCI-related complications is required to guide further management given that their occurrence may be associated with increased risk of major adverse cardiac events (MACE). Due to lack of scientific data, the cut-off thresholds of post-PCI cardiac troponin (cTn) elevation used for defining periprocedural myocardial injury and infarction, have been selected based on expert consensus opinions, and their prognostic relevance remains unclear. In this Consensus Document from the ESC Working Group on Cellular Biology of the Heart and European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI), we recommend, whenever possible, the measurement of baseline (pre-PCI) cTn and post-PCI cTn values in all CCS patients undergoing PCI. We confirm the prognostic relevance of the post-PCI cTn elevation >5× 99th percentile URL threshold used to define type 4a myocardial infarction (MI). In the absence of periprocedural angiographic flow-limiting complications or electrocardiogram (ECG) and imaging evidence of new myocardial ischaemia, we propose the same post-PCI cTn cut-off threshold (>5× 99th percentile URL) be used to define prognostically relevant ‘major’ periprocedural myocardial injury. As both type 4a MI and major periprocedural myocardial injury are strong independent predictors of all-cause mortality at 1 year post-PCI, they may be used as quality metrics and surrogate endpoints for clinical trials. Further research is needed to evaluate treatment strategies for reducing the risk of major periprocedural myocardial injury, type 4a MI, and MACE in CCS patients undergoing PCI.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Cureus
                Cureus
                2168-8184
                Cureus
                Cureus (Palo Alto (CA) )
                2168-8184
                15 August 2024
                August 2024
                : 16
                : 8
                : e66938
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Cardiology, Abbottabad International Medical College, Abbottabad, PAK
                [2 ] Emergency Medicine, National Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, Karachi, PAK
                [3 ] Medicine, Islamic International Medical College, Islamabad, PAK
                [4 ] Medicine, Sindh Medical College, Karachi, PAK
                [5 ] Medicine, Sir Syed College of Medical Sciences for Girls, Karachi, PAK
                [6 ] Medicine, Ziauddin Medical College and Hospital, Karachi, PAK
                [7 ] Research and Development, Shing Huei Group, Taipei, TWN
                [8 ] Nephrology, Fatima Memorial Hospital, Karachi, PAK
                Author notes
                Article
                10.7759/cureus.66938
                11401642
                39280403
                ce9fcf2d-712b-449d-ac60-4ea3667a5e2d
                Copyright © 2024, Tariq et al.

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License CC-BY 4.0., which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 15 August 2024
                Categories
                Cardiac/Thoracic/Vascular Surgery
                Cardiology
                Emergency Medicine

                systematic review and meta-analysis,major adverse cardiovascular event,primary percutaneous intervention,nicorandil,myocardial injury

                Comments

                Comment on this article