Team interaction behaviors correlates with team creativity among nursing students: Canonical correlation and moderation analyses

There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

Abstract

Background

Prior studies have indicated team members’ interaction behaviors may predict creativity among nursing students.

Methods

This study investigated the correlation between interaction behaviors and creativity, both individual- and team-level, among nursing students. In this cross-sectional quantitative study, data were obtained from self-reported questionnaires. Individual creativity was assessed using the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking scale; the perceived team interaction behavior and team creativity were assessed using validated instruments. Canonical correlation analysis was conducted to determine the overall correlation between interaction behaviors, and creativity, and the moderating effect of female proportion dominance was also examined.

Results

A total of 164 nursing students (84.1% female) arranged into 14 teams were included in this study. Canonical correlation analysis showed a positive correlation between interaction behaviors and creativity (correlation = 0.88). All dimensions of interactive behaviors were positively related to creativity dimensions. A stronger correlation to team creativity (correlation = 1) was found compared to individual creativity (correlation = 0.07). This study demonstrated that individual interactive behaviors including spontaneous communication and helping behavior predicted high team creativity.

Conclusions

This insight may be valuable for nursing education programs seeking to foster creativity and effective teamwork. The potential moderating effect of female proportions on team interaction behaviors and creativity should be investigated further.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12912-024-02158-7.

Related collections

Most cited references 46

Record: found
Abstract: not found
Article: not found

r-sub(wg): An assessment of within-group interrater agreement.

Lawrence R. James, Robert Demaree, Gerrit Wolf (1993)

0 comments Cited 513 times – based on 0 reviews      Review now

Bookmark

Record: found
Abstract: found
Article: not found

The relative trustworthiness of inferential tests of the indirect effect in statistical mediation analysis: does method really matter?

Andrew F Hayes, Michael Scharkow (2013)

A content analysis of 2 years of Psychological Science articles reveals inconsistencies in how researchers make inferences about indirect effects when conducting a statistical mediation analysis. In this study, we examined the frequency with which popularly used tests disagree, whether the method an investigator uses makes a difference in the conclusion he or she will reach, and whether there is a most trustworthy test that can be recommended to balance practical and performance considerations. We found that tests agree much more frequently than they disagree, but disagreements are more common when an indirect effect exists than when it does not. We recommend the bias-corrected bootstrap confidence interval as the most trustworthy test if power is of utmost concern, although it can be slightly liberal in some circumstances. Investigators concerned about Type I errors should choose the Monte Carlo confidence interval or the distribution-of-the-product approach, which rarely disagree. The percentile bootstrap confidence interval is a good compromise test.

0 comments Cited 419 times – based on 0 reviews      Review now

Bookmark

Record: found
Abstract: found
Article: not found

Teamwork in healthcare: Key discoveries enabling safer, high-quality care.

Michael Rosen, Deborah DiazGranados, Aaron S Dietz … (2018)

Few industries match the scale of health care. In the United States alone, an estimated 85% of the population has at least 1 health care encounter annually and at least one quarter of these people experience 4 to 9 encounters annually. A single visit requires collaboration among a multidisciplinary group of clinicians, administrative staff, patients, and their loved ones. Multiple visits often occur across different clinicians working in different organizations. Ineffective care coordination and the underlying suboptimal teamwork processes are a public health issue. Health care delivery systems exemplify complex organizations operating under high stakes in dynamic policy and regulatory environments. The coordination and delivery of safe, high-quality care demands reliable teamwork and collaboration within, as well as across, organizational, disciplinary, technical, and cultural boundaries. In this review, we synthesize the evidence examining teams and teamwork in health care delivery settings in order to characterize the current state of the science and to highlight gaps in which studies can further illuminate our evidence-based understanding of teamwork and collaboration. Specifically, we highlight evidence concerning (a) the relationship between teamwork and multilevel outcomes, (b) effective teamwork behaviors, (c) competencies (i.e., knowledge, skills, and attitudes) underlying effective teamwork in the health professions, (d) teamwork interventions, (e) team performance measurement strategies, and (f) the critical role context plays in shaping teamwork and collaboration in practice. We also distill potential avenues for future research and highlight opportunities to understand the translation, dissemination, and implementation of evidence-based teamwork principles into practice. (PsycINFO Database Record

0 comments Cited 261 times – based on 0 reviews      Review now

Bookmark

All references

Author and article information

Contributors

Ding-Yang Hsu: hsuchiapin@mail.mcut.edu.tw

Chen-Hung Chiang: megan@mail.cgust.edu.tw

Journal

Journal ID (nlm-ta): BMC Nurs

Journal ID (iso-abbrev): BMC Nurs

Title: BMC Nursing

Publisher: BioMed Central (London )

ISSN (Electronic): 1472-6955

Publication date (Electronic): 16 July 2024

Publication date PMC-release: 16 July 2024

Publication date Collection: 2024

Volume: 23

Electronic Location Identifier: 484

Affiliations

[1 ]GRID grid.418428.3, Department of Nursing, , Chang Gung University of Science and Technology, ; Taoyuan City, Taiwan

[2 ]Department of Nursing, New Taipei Municipal TuCheng Hospital (Built and Operated By Chang Gung Medical Foundation), ( https://ror.org/02verss31) New Taipei City, Taiwan

[3 ]GRID grid.145695.a, ISNI 0000 0004 1798 0922, Department of Nursing, , Chang Gung University, ; Taoyuan City, Taiwan

[4 ]Institute of Creative Design and Management, National Taipei University of Business, ( https://ror.org/029hrv109) Taoyuan City, Taiwan

[5 ]Department of Industrial Design, Ming Chi University of Technology, ( https://ror.org/04xgh4d03) New Taipei City, Taiwan

[6 ]Department of Gerontology and Health Care Management, Chang Gung University of Science and Technology, ( https://ror.org/009knm296) Taoyuan City, Taiwan

Article

Publisher ID: 2158

DOI: 10.1186/s12912-024-02158-7

PMC ID: 11251228

PubMed ID: 39014406

SO-VID: ce3f4866-bfed-4f29-917f-96510cd16aa5

License:

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

History

Date received : 17 January 2024

Date accepted : 8 July 2024

Custom metadata

ScienceOpen disciplines: Nursing

Keywords: interaction behavior,team creativity,moderating effect,nursing education,nursing students

Data availability:

ScienceOpen disciplines: Nursing

Keywords: interaction behavior, team creativity, moderating effect, nursing education, nursing students

Team interaction behaviors correlates with team creativity among nursing students: Canonical correlation and moderation analyses

Read this article at

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Supplementary Information

Related collections

International Journal of Applied Technology in Medical Sciences

Most cited references 46

r-sub(wg): An assessment of within-group interrater agreement.

The relative trustworthiness of inferential tests of the indirect effect in statistical mediation analysis: does method really matter?

Teamwork in healthcare: Key discoveries enabling safer, high-quality care.

Author and article information

Contributors

Journal

Affiliations

Article

History

Categories

Custom metadata

Comments

Comment on this article

Similar content 108

Most referenced authors 386