13
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Human–Autonomy Teaming: A Review and Analysis of the Empirical Literature

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective

          We define human–autonomy teaming and offer a synthesis of the existing empirical research on the topic. Specifically, we identify the research environments, dependent variables, themes representing the key findings, and critical future research directions.

          Background

          Whereas a burgeoning literature on high-performance teamwork identifies the factors critical to success, much less is known about how human–autonomy teams (HATs) achieve success. Human–autonomy teamwork involves humans working interdependently toward a common goal along with autonomous agents. Autonomous agents involve a degree of self-government and self-directed behavior (agency), and autonomous agents take on a unique role or set of tasks and work interdependently with human team members to achieve a shared objective.

          Method

          We searched the literature on human–autonomy teaming. To meet our criteria for inclusion, the paper needed to involve empirical research and meet our definition of human–autonomy teaming. We found 76 articles that met our criteria for inclusion.

          Results

          We report on research environments and we find that the key independent variables involve autonomous agent characteristics, team composition, task characteristics, human individual differences, training, and communication. We identify themes for each of these and discuss the future research needs.

          Conclusion

          There are areas where research findings are clear and consistent, but there are many opportunities for future research. Particularly important will be research that identifies mechanisms linking team input to team output variables.

          Related collections

          Most cited references177

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          A Cyber-Physical Systems architecture for Industry 4.0-based manufacturing systems

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Humans and Automation: Use, Misuse, Disuse, Abuse

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Work group diversity.

              Work group diversity, the degree to which there are differences between group members, may affect group process and performance positively as well as negatively. Much is still unclear about the effects of diversity, however. We review the 1997-2005 literature on work group diversity to assess the state of the art and to identify key issues for future research. This review points to the need for more complex conceptualizations of diversity, as well as to the need for more empirical attention to the processes that are assumed to underlie the effects of diversity on group process and performance and to the contingency factors of these processes.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Hum Factors
                Hum Factors
                sphfs
                HFS
                Human Factors
                SAGE Publications (Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA )
                0018-7208
                1547-8181
                22 October 2020
                August 2022
                : 64
                : 5
                : 904-938
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Ringgold 2129; University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
                [2 ]Curtin University, WA, Australia
                [3 ]Ringgold 2545; Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina, USA
                [4 ]Ringgold 8431; University of Waterloo, Canada
                Author notes
                [*]Thomas O’Neill, Department of Psychology, University of Calgary, AB, T2N 1N4, Canada; toneill@ 123456ucalgary.ca
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8336-5763
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3704-697X
                Article
                10.1177_0018720820960865
                10.1177/0018720820960865
                9284085
                33092417
                ccef4ae9-df81-450a-aac3-f88b4d2e0c38
                © The Author(s) 2020

                This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages ( https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).

                History
                : 20 August 2020
                : 10 February 2020
                Categories
                Teams And Groups
                Custom metadata
                ts10

                teamwork,team processes,team performance,human–autonomy teaming,human–automation interaction,human–agent collaboration

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content238

                Cited by53

                Most referenced authors1,254