17
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      In vivo measurement of bending stiffness in fracture healing

      research-article
      1 , , 2 , 3
      BioMedical Engineering OnLine
      BioMed Central

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Measurement of the bending stiffness a healing fracture represents a valid variable in the assessment of fracture healing. However, currently available methods typically have high measurement errors, even for mild pin loosening. Furthermore, these methods cannot provide actual values of bending stiffness, which precludes comparisons among individual fractures. Thus, even today, little information is available with regards to the fracture healing pattern with respect to actual values of bending stiffness. Our goals were, therefore: to develop a measurement device that would allow accurate and sensitive measurement of bending stiffness, even in the presence of mild pin loosening; to describe the course of healing in individual fractures; and help to evaluate whether the individual pattern of bending stiffness can be predicted at an early stage of healing.

          Methods

          A new measurement device has been developed to precisely measure the bending stiffness of the healing fracture by simulating four-point-bending. The system was calibrated on aluminum models and intact tibiae. The influence of pin loosening on measurement error was evaluated. The system was tested at weekly intervals in an animal experiment to determine the actual bending stiffness of the fracture. Transverse fractures were created in the right tibia of twelve sheep, and then stabilized with an external fixator. At ten weeks, bending stiffness of the tibiae were determined in a four-point-bending test device to validate the in-vivo-measurement data.

          Results

          In-vivo bending stiffness can be measured accurately and sensitive, even in the early phase of callus healing. Up to a bending stiffness of 10 Nm/degree, measurement error was below 3.4% for one pin loose, and below 29.3% for four pins loose, respectively. Measurement of stiffness data over time revealed a significant logarithmic increase between the third and seventh weeks, whereby the logarithmic rate of change among sheep was similar, but started from different levels. Comparative measurements showed that early individual changes between the third and fourth weeks can be used as a predictor of bending stiffness at seven weeks (r = 0.928) and at ten weeks (r = 0.710).

          Conclusion

          Bending stiffness can be measured precisely, with less error in the case of pin loosening. Prediction of the future healing course of the individual fracture can be assessed by changes from the third to the fourth week, with differences in stiffness levels. Therefore, the initial status of the fracture seems to have a high impact on the individual healing course.

          Related collections

          Most cited references36

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Concepts of fracture union, delayed union, and nonunion.

          Laboratory and clinical scientists and practicing clinicians need definitions of union, delayed union, and nonunion. Fracture union is a gradual process, so quantitative measures are the most meaningful. However, end point definitions also are useful, but they need empirical validation. The measure that has received the best validation in human fractures is bending stiffness. Quantitative radiologic assessment of healing is difficult because varying patterns of bone bridging can occur, including periosteal, endosteal, and intercortical patterns. Natural fracture healing was studied in 43 cases of isolated, closed, conservatively treated tibial shaft fracture with serial measurements of bending stiffness and standard radiographs. Three healing groups were defined on the basis of stiffness recovery patterns. Four cases showed delayed union, defined as failure to reach a stiffness of 7 N-m per degree by 20 weeks from fracture. The remaining cases had normal union, but at differing rates. Callus index was used as a measure of periosteal new bone formation. Stiffness measurements correlated more strongly than callus index with injury severity and functional outcome at 6 months. However, the callus index predicted behavior in those fractures that showed no tendency to heal at the 10-week stage. That is, absence of periosteal new bone in these cases presaged delayed union. These delayed union cases all eventually healed, still without producing periosteal callus, but other fractures in the series healed very rapidly, also without periosteal callus. The implication is that endosteal healing is capable of very rapid fracture bridging if conditions are right, but it also can occur late, after the periosteal healing response has ceased. These observations suggest a more rational approach to the definition of union, delayed union, and nonunion than that provided by the selection of arbitrary times. For conservatively treated fractures at least, delayed union can be defined as the cessation of the periosteal response before the fracture successfully has been bridged. Nonunion is the cessation of both the periosteal and endosteal healing responses without bridging.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Axial movement and tibial fractures. A controlled randomised trial of treatment.

            Diaphyseal fractures of the tibia in 80 patients were treated by external skeletal fixation using a unilateral frame, either in a fixed mode or in a mode which allowed the application of a small amount of predominantly axial micromovement. Patients were allocated to each regime by random selection. Fracture healing was assessed clinically, radiologically and by measurement of the mechanical stiffness of the fracture. Both clinical and mechanical healing were enhanced in the group subjected to micromovement, compared to those treated with frames in a fixed mode possessing an overall stiffness similar to that of others in common clinical use. The differences in healing time were statistically significant and independently related to the treatment method. There was no difference in complication rates between treatment groups.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Controlled mechanical stimulation in the treatment of tibial fractures.

              Although it is known that the mechanical environment affects the fracture healing process, the optimal conditions for the different stages of healing have not been defined. In the present studies, the influence of applying a very short period of axial micromovement with defined characteristics to healing fractures has been studied both in simulated and clinical tibial fractures. The fracture healing process is seen to be acutely sensitive to small periods of daily strain applied axially within two weeks of fracture. There are boundaries of strain magnitude and force of application of applied movement that, if exceeded, inhibit the healing process. The application of appropriate applied strain to clinical tibial fractures at a time shortly after injury, when most patients would be very inactive, appears to enhance the healing process when using external skeletal fixation.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Biomed Eng Online
                BioMedical Engineering OnLine
                BioMed Central (London )
                1475-925X
                2003
                28 March 2003
                : 2
                : 8
                Affiliations
                [1 ]University of Regensburg, Trauma Centre Regensburg, Franz-Josef-Strauss-Allee 11, D – 93042 Regensburg, Germany
                [2 ]Plazziel 175, CH – 7477 Filisur, Switzerland
                [3 ]AO-Research Institute, Clavadelerstrasse, CH – 7270 DAVOS, Switzerland
                Article
                1475-925X-2-8
                10.1186/1475-925X-2-8
                153498
                14599296
                cbe7951e-5e49-491c-aa9e-3e2a6bdcca3e
                Copyright © 2003 Hente et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article: verbatim copying and redistribution of this article are permitted in all media for any purpose, provided this notice is preserved along with the article's original URL.
                History
                : 11 November 2002
                : 28 March 2003
                Categories
                Research

                Biomedical engineering
                Biomedical engineering

                Comments

                Comment on this article