2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Risk factors of transport gap bending deformity in the treatment of critical-size bone defect after bone transport

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          The purpose of this study was to investigate the risk factors of transport gap bending deformity (TGBD) in the treatment of critical-size bone defect (CSBD) after the removal of the external fixator.

          Methods

          From January 2008 to December 2019, 178 patients with bone defects of the lower extremity caused by infection were treated by bone transport using a unilateral external fixator in our medical institution. TGBD was defined as the bone callus in the distraction area with a deviation to the force line of the femur (> 10°) or tibia (> 12°) after removal of the external fixator. The Association for the Study and Application of the Method of Ilizarov (ASAMI) standard was applied to assess the bone and functional outcomes. After the data were significant by the T-test or Pearson’s Chi-square test was analyzed, odds ratios were calculated using logistic regression tests to describe factors associated with the diagnosis of TGBD.

          Results

          A total of 178 patients were enrolled in the study, with a mean follow-up time of 28.6 ± 3.82 months. The positive result of the bacteria isolated test was observed in 144 cases (80.9%). The rate of excellent and good in the bone outcomes (excellent/good/fair/poor/failure, 41/108/15/14/0) was 83.7%, and 92.3% in the functional results (excellent/good/fair/poor/failure, 50/98/16/14/0) according to the ASAMI criteria. TGBD after removal of external fixator occurred in twenty-two patients (12.3%), including 6 tibias, and 16 femurs. Age > 45 years, BMI > 25 kg/m 2, femoral defect, diabetes, osteoporosis, glucocorticoid intake, duration of infection > 24 months, EFT > 9 months, EFI > 1.8 month/cm were associated significantly with a higher incidence of TGBD in the binary logistic regression analysis ( P < 0.05). The incidence more than 50% was found in patients with femoral defect (76.1%), osteoporosis (72.7%), BMI > 25 kg/m 2 (69.0%), diabetes (59.5%), glucocorticoid intake (54.7%). In the multivariate logistic regression analyses, the following factors were associated independently with TGBD, including age > 45 years, BMI > 25 kg/m 2, femoral defect, diabetes, and osteoporosis.

          Conclusions

          Bone transport using a unilateral external fixator was a safe and practical method in the treatment of CSBD caused by infection. The top five risk factors of TGBD included femoral defect, BMI > 25 kg/m 2, duration of bone infection > 24 months, age > 45 years, and diabetes. Age > 45 years, BMI > 25 kg/m 2, femoral defect, osteoporosis, and diabetes were the independent risk factors. The higher incidence of TGBD may be associated with more risk factors.

          Related collections

          Most cited references39

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Mechanisms of diabetes mellitus-induced bone fragility

          Diabetes mellitus is associated with an increased risk of fragility fractures. Here, Napoli and colleagues discuss the complex interactions between glucose homeostasis and bone fragility, the epidemiology of fractures in patients with diabetes mellitus and the effects of antidiabetic drugs on bone health.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Problems, Obstacles, and Complications of Limb Lengthening by the Ilizarov Technique

            Dror Paley (1990)
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Diabetes and Its Effect on Bone and Fracture Healing.

              Diabetes mellitus is a metabolic disorder that increases fracture risk, interferes with bone formation, and impairs fracture healing. Type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) both increase fracture risk and have several common features that affect the bone including hyperglycemia and increased advanced glycation end product (AGE) formation, reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation, and inflammation. These factors affect both osteoblasts and osteoclasts leading to increased osteoclasts and reduced numbers of osteoblasts and bone formation. In addition to fracture healing, T1DM and T2DM impair bone formation under conditions of perturbation such as bacteria-induced periodontal bone loss by increasing osteoblast apoptosis and reducing expression of factors that stimulate osteoblasts such as BMPs and growth factors.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                rpsky@126.com
                Journal
                BMC Musculoskelet Disord
                BMC Musculoskelet Disord
                BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
                BioMed Central (London )
                1471-2474
                8 October 2022
                8 October 2022
                2022
                : 23
                : 900
                Affiliations
                GRID grid.412631.3, Department of Trauma and Microreconstructive Surgery, , The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, ; Urumqi, 830054 Xinjiang China
                Article
                5852
                10.1186/s12891-022-05852-2
                9548124
                36209097
                1ba5408a-6d77-40da-b4cd-dae98846a7a7
                © The Author(s) 2022

                Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

                History
                : 14 June 2022
                : 23 September 2022
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100015310, Natural Science Foundation of Xinjiang;
                Award ID: NO.2020D01C250
                Award Recipient :
                Categories
                Research
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2022

                Orthopedics
                bone transport,external fixator,bone defects,ilizarov technique,complications
                Orthopedics
                bone transport, external fixator, bone defects, ilizarov technique, complications

                Comments

                Comment on this article