21
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Branched actin networks push against each other at adherens junctions to maintain cell–cell adhesion

      research-article
      ,
      The Journal of Cell Biology
      Rockefeller University Press

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The actin cytoskeleton at adherens junctions acts as a dynamic push–pull system, wherein pushing forces generated in both contacting cells through Arp2/3 complex–dependent actin polymerization maintain cadherin transinteraction in the extracellular gap, whereas pulling forces stabilize intercellular adhesion complexes.

          Abstract

          Adherens junctions (AJs) are mechanosensitive cadherin-based intercellular adhesions that interact with the actin cytoskeleton and carry most of the mechanical load at cell–cell junctions. Both Arp2/3 complex–dependent actin polymerization generating pushing force and nonmuscle myosin II (NMII)-dependent contraction producing pulling force are necessary for AJ morphogenesis. Which actin system directly interacts with AJs is unknown. Using platinum replica electron microscopy of endothelial cells, we show that vascular endothelial (VE)-cadherin colocalizes with Arp2/3 complex–positive actin networks at different AJ types and is positioned at the interface between two oppositely oriented branched networks from adjacent cells. In contrast, actin–NMII bundles are located more distally from the VE-cadherin–rich zone. After Arp2/3 complex inhibition, linear AJs split, leaving gaps between cells with detergent-insoluble VE-cadherin transiently associated with the gap edges. After NMII inhibition, VE-cadherin is lost from gap edges. We propose that the actin cytoskeleton at AJs acts as a dynamic push–pull system, wherein pushing forces maintain extracellular VE-cadherin transinteraction and pulling forces stabilize intracellular adhesion complexes.

          Related collections

          Most cited references78

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          alpha-Catenin as a tension transducer that induces adherens junction development.

          Adherens junctions (AJs), which are organized by adhesion proteins and the underlying actin cytoskeleton, probably sense pulling forces from adjacent cells and modulate opposing forces to maintain tissue integrity, but the regulatory mechanism remains unknown at the molecular level. Although the possibility that alpha-catenin acts as a direct linker between the membrane and the actin cytoskeleton for AJ formation and function has been minimized, here we show that alpha-catenin recruits vinculin, another main actin-binding protein of AJs, through force-dependent changes in alpha-catenin conformation. We identified regions in the alpha-catenin molecule that are required for its force-dependent binding of vinculin by introducing mutant alpha-catenin into cells and using in vitro binding assays. Fluorescence recovery after photobleaching analysis for alpha-catenin mobility and the existence of an antibody recognizing alpha-catenin in a force-dependent manner further supported the notion that alpha-catenin is a tension transducer that translates mechanical stimuli into a chemical response, resulting in AJ development.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The Actin Cytoskeleton and Actin-Based Motility

            The actin cytoskeleton—a collection of actin filaments with their accessory and regulatory proteins—is the primary force-generating machinery in the cell. It can produce pushing (protrusive) forces through coordinated polymerization of multiple actin filaments or pulling (contractile) forces through sliding actin filaments along bipolar filaments of myosin II. Both force types are particularly important for whole-cell migration, but they also define and change the cell shape and mechanical properties of the cell surface, drive the intracellular motility and morphogenesis of membrane organelles, and allow cells to form adhesions with each other and with the extracellular matrix.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Cell adhesion. The minimal cadherin-catenin complex binds to actin filaments under force.

              Linkage between the adherens junction (AJ) and the actin cytoskeleton is required for tissue development and homeostasis. In vivo findings indicated that the AJ proteins E-cadherin, β-catenin, and the filamentous (F)-actin binding protein αE-catenin form a minimal cadherin-catenin complex that binds directly to F-actin. Biochemical studies challenged this model because the purified cadherin-catenin complex does not bind F-actin in solution. Here, we reconciled this difference. Using an optical trap-based assay, we showed that the minimal cadherin-catenin complex formed stable bonds with an actin filament under force. Bond dissociation kinetics can be explained by a catch-bond model in which force shifts the bond from a weakly to a strongly bound state. These results may explain how the cadherin-catenin complex transduces mechanical forces at cell-cell junctions. Copyright © 2014, American Association for the Advancement of Science.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Cell Biol
                J. Cell Biol
                jcb
                jcb
                The Journal of Cell Biology
                Rockefeller University Press
                0021-9525
                1540-8140
                07 May 2018
                : 217
                : 5
                : 1827-1845
                Affiliations
                [1]Department of Biology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
                Author notes
                Correspondence to Tatyana Svitkina: svitkina@ 123456sas.upenn.edu
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8424-447X
                Article
                201708103
                10.1083/jcb.201708103
                5940301
                29507127
                cb1f2a5e-0f8b-4be8-9358-e7e854b8e26c
                © 2018 Efimova and Svitkina

                This article is distributed under the terms of an Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike–No Mirror Sites license for the first six months after the publication date (see http://www.rupress.org/terms/). After six months it is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike 4.0 International license, as described at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/).

                History
                : 15 August 2017
                : 21 December 2017
                : 12 February 2018
                Funding
                Funded by: National Institutes of Health, DOI https://doi.org/10.13039/100000002;
                Award ID: R01 GM 095977
                Categories
                Research Articles
                Article
                10
                20

                Cell biology
                Cell biology

                Comments

                Comment on this article