13
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Biomechanical diagnostics of the cornea

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Corneal biomechanics has been a hot topic for research in contemporary ophthalmology due to its prospective applications in diagnosis, management, and treatment of several clinical conditions, including glaucoma, elective keratorefractive surgery, and different corneal diseases. The clinical biomechanical investigation has become of great importance in the setting of refractive surgery to identify patients at higher risk of developing iatrogenic ectasia after laser vision correction. This review discusses the latest developments in the detection of corneal ectatic diseases. These developments should be considered in conjunction with multimodal corneal and refractive imaging, including Placido-disk based corneal topography, Scheimpflug corneal tomography, anterior segment tomography, spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT), very-high-frequency ultrasound (VHF-US), ocular biometry, and ocular wavefront measurements. The ocular response analyzer (ORA) and the Corvis ST are non-contact tonometry systems that provide a clinical corneal biomechanical assessment. More recently, Brillouin optical microscopy has been demonstrated to provide in vivo biomechanical measurements. The integration of tomographic and biomechanical data into artificial intelligence techniques has demonstrated the ability to increase the accuracy to detect ectatic disease and characterize the inherent susceptibility for biomechanical failure and ectasia progression, which is a severe complication after laser vision correction.

          Related collections

          Most cited references78

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Determining in vivo biomechanical properties of the cornea with an ocular response analyzer.

          David Luce (2005)
          To study the results of an ocular response analyzer (ORA) to determine the biomechanical properties of the cornea and their relationship to intraocular pressure (IOP). Reichert Inc., Depew, New York, USA. The ORA (Reichert) makes 2 essentially instantaneous applanation measurements that permit determination of corneal and IOP effects. Measurements of several populations indicate that corneal hysteresis, a biomechanical measure, varied over a dynamic range of 1.8 to 14.6 mm Hg and was only weakly correlated with corneal thickness (r(2)=0.12); this is related to the observation that some subjects with relatively thick corneas have less-than-average corneal hysteresis. Corneal hysteresis changes diurnally, presumably as a result of hydration changes. Keratoconus, Fuchs' dystrophy, and post-LASIK patients demonstrated low corneal hysteresis. The corneal hysteresis biomechanical measure may prove valuable for qualification and predictions of outcomes of refractive surgery and in other cases in which corneal biomechanics are important.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Introduction of Two Novel Stiffness Parameters and Interpretation of Air Puff-Induced Biomechanical Deformation Parameters With a Dynamic Scheimpflug Analyzer.

            To investigate two new stiffness parameters and their relationships with the dynamic corneal response (DCR) parameters and compare normal and keratoconic eyes.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Novel pachymetric parameters based on corneal tomography for diagnosing keratoconus.

              To describe pachymetric progression indices (PPI) of the Pentacam HR (Oculus Optikgeräte GmbH) and the concept of relational thickness, and to test their accuracy for differentiating keratoconic and normal corneas compared with single-point thickness values. One hundred thirteen individual eyes randomly selected from 113 normal patients and 44 eyes of 44 patients with keratoconus were studied using the Pentacam HR by acquiring central corneal thickness (CCT), thinnest point (TP), position of the TP and PPI at minimal (PPI Min) and maximal (PPI Max) meridians, and the average (PPI Ave) of all meridians. Relational thickness parameters were calculated as the ratios of TP and CCT and PPI values. Mann-Whitney U test assessed differences in groups for each variable. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were calculated for all variables and pairwise comparisons were performed. Statistically significant differences were noted between normal and keratoconic eyes for all parameters (P<.001), except for horizontal position of TP (P=.79). The best parameters, named Ambrósio's Relational Thickness (ART), were ART-Ave (TP/PPI Ave) and ART-Max (TP/PPI Max) with areas under the ROC curves of 0.987 and 0.983, respectively. The best cutoffs were 424 μm and 339 μm for ART-Ave and ART-Max, respectively. Pachymetric progression indices and ART had a greater area under the curve than TP and CCT (P<.001); TP (0.955) had a greater area under the curve than CCT (0.909; P=.002). Tomographic-derived pachymetric parameters were better able to differentiate normal and keratoconic corneas than single-point pachymetric measurements. Further studies are needed to evaluate the role of tomography in identifying early forms of ectasia as well as ectasia risk among LASIK candidates. Copyright 2011, SLACK Incorporated.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                dr.renatoambrosio@gmail.com
                Journal
                Eye Vis (Lond)
                Eye Vis (Lond)
                Eye and Vision
                BioMed Central (London )
                2326-0254
                5 February 2020
                5 February 2020
                2020
                : 7
                : 9
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Rio de Janeiro Corneal Tomography and Biomechanics Study Group, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
                [2 ]Instituto de Olhos Renato Ambrósio, Rua Conde de Bonfim 211 / 712, Rio de Janeiro, RJ 20520-050 Brazil
                [3 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0523 501X, GRID grid.457081.f, Department of Ophthalmology, , Hospital São Vicente de Paulo, ; Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
                [4 ]Brazilian Study Group of Artificial Intelligence and Corneal Analysis – BrAIN, Rio de Janeiro & Maceió, Brazil
                [5 ]ISNI 0000 0001 0514 7202, GRID grid.411249.b, Department of Ophthalmology, , Federal University of São Paulo, ; São Paulo, Brazil
                [6 ]Instituto Benjamin Constant, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
                [7 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1936 8470, GRID grid.10025.36, School of Engineering, , University of Liverpool, ; Liverpool, L69 3GH UK
                [8 ]GRID grid.452490.e, Department of Biomedical Science, , Humanitas University, ; Rozzano, Italy
                [9 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1756 8807, GRID grid.417728.f, Eye Center, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, ; Rozzano, Italy
                [10 ]Department of Ophthalmology, Humanitas San Pio X Hospital, Milan, Italy
                [11 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2285 7943, GRID grid.261331.4, Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Department of Biomedical Engineering, , The Ohio State University, ; Columbus, OH USA
                [12 ]ISNI 0000 0000 9999 1211, GRID grid.64939.31, School of Biological Science and Biomedical Engineering, , Beihang University, ; Beijing, China
                [13 ]ISNI 0000 0000 9168 0080, GRID grid.436474.6, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre for Ophthalmology, , Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust and UCL Institute of Ophthalmology, ; London, UK
                [14 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1936 8091, GRID grid.15276.37, The University of Florida Department of Ophthalmology, ; Gainesville, FL USA
                [15 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2237 7915, GRID grid.467095.9, Department of Ophthalmology, , Federal University the State of Rio de Janeiro (UNIRIO), ; Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6919-4606
                Article
                174
                10.1186/s40662-020-0174-x
                7001259
                32042837
                ca6cb5cf-23e7-475d-af9c-025705aac524
                © The Author(s). 2020

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 10 July 2019
                : 8 January 2020
                Categories
                Review
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2020

                corneal biomechanics,corneal ectasia,corneal imaging

                Comments

                Comment on this article