1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Biomechanical Effects of tPRK, FS-LASIK, and SMILE on the Cornea

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Purpose: The objective of this study is to evaluate the in vivo corneal biomechanical response to three laser refractive surgeries.

          Methods: Two hundred and twenty-seven patients who submitted to transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (tPRK), femtosecond laser-assisted in-situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK), or small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) were included in this study. All cases were examined with the Corvis ST preoperatively (up to 3 months) and postoperatively at 1, 3, and 6 months, and the differences in the main device parameters were assessed. The three groups were matched in age, gender ratio, corneal thickness, refractive error corrections, optical zone diameter, and intraocular pressure. They were also matched in the preoperative biomechanical metrics provided by the Corvis ST including stiffness parameter at first applanation (SP-A1), integrated inverse radius (IIR), deformation amplitude (DA), and deformation amplitude 2 mm away from apex and the apical deformation (DARatio2mm).

          Results: The results demonstrated a significant decrease post-operation in SP-A1 and significant increases in IIR, DA, and DARatio2mm ( p < 0.05), all of which indicated reductions in overall corneal stiffness. Inter-procedure comparisons provided evidence that the smallest overall stiffness reduction was in the tPRK group, followed by the SMILE, and then the FS-LASIK group ( p < 0.05). These results remained valid after correction for the change in CCT between pre and 6 months post-operation and for the percentage tissue altered. In all three surgery groups, higher degrees of refractive correction resulted in larger overall stiffness losses based on most of the biomechanical metrics.

          Conclusion: The corneal biomechanical response to the three surgery procedures varied significantly. With similar corneal thickness loss, the reductions in overall corneal stiffness were the highest in FS-LASIK and the lowest in tPRK.

          Related collections

          Most cited references45

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Introduction of Two Novel Stiffness Parameters and Interpretation of Air Puff-Induced Biomechanical Deformation Parameters With a Dynamic Scheimpflug Analyzer.

          To investigate two new stiffness parameters and their relationships with the dynamic corneal response (DCR) parameters and compare normal and keratoconic eyes.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Refractive surgery

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Mathematical model to compare the relative tensile strength of the cornea after PRK, LASIK, and small incision lenticule extraction.

              To develop a mathematical model to estimate the relative differences in postoperative stromal tensile strength following photorefractive keratectomy (PRK), LASIK, and small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE). Using previously published data where in vitro corneal stromal tensile strength was determined as a function of depth, a mathematical model was built to calculate the relative remaining tensile strength by fitting the data with a fourth order polynomial function yielding a high correlation coefficient (R(2) = 0.930). Calculating the area under this function provided a measure of total stromal tensile strength (TTS), based only on the residual stromal layer for PRK or LASIK and the residual stromal layers above and below the lenticule interface for SMILE. Postoperative TTS was greatest after SMILE, followed by PRK, then LASIK; for example, in a 550-μm cornea after 100-μm tissue removal, postoperative TTS was 75% for SMILE (130-μm cap), 68% for PRK, and 54% for LASIK (110-μm flap). The postoperative TTS decreased for thinner corneal pachymetry for all treatment types. In LASIK, the postoperative TTS decreased with increasing flap thickness by 0.22%/μm, but increased by 0.08%/μm for greater cap thickness in SMILE. The model predicted that SMILE lenticule thickness could be approximately 100 μm greater than the LASIK ablation depth and still have equivalent corneal strength (equivalent to approximately 7.75 diopters). This mathematical model predicts that the postoperative TTS is considerably higher after SMILE than both PRK and LASIK, as expected given that the strongest anterior lamellae remain intact. Consequently, SMILE should be able to correct higher levels of myopia. Copyright 2013, SLACK Incorporated.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Bioeng Biotechnol
                Front Bioeng Biotechnol
                Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol.
                Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                2296-4185
                31 March 2022
                2022
                : 10
                : 834270
                Affiliations
                [1] 1 Eye Hospital , Wenzhou Medical University , Wenzhou, China
                [2] 2 School of Engineering , University of Liverpool , Liverpool, United Kingdom
                [3] 3 The Institute of Ocular Biomechanics , Wenzhou Medical University , Wenzhou, China
                [4] 4 STU-CUHK Joint Shantou International Eye Center , Shantou, China
                [5] 5 Wuhan Puren Hospital , Wuhan, China
                [6] 6 National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre for Ophthalmology , Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust and UCL Institute of Ophthalmology , London, United Kingdom
                [7] 7 Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Biomedical Engineering , Beihang University , Beijing, China
                Author notes

                Edited by: Yang Liu, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong SAR, China

                Reviewed by: Jianmin Shang, Fudan University, China

                Weiwei Yan, China Jiliang University, China

                Jorge L. Alio, Miguel Hernández University, Spain

                *Correspondence: ShiHao Chen, chenshihao73@ 123456126.com ; YuFeng Ye, yeyufeng2000@ 123456126.com ; FangJun Bao, bfjmd@ 123456126.com

                This article was submitted to Biomechanics, a section of the journal Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology

                Article
                834270
                10.3389/fbioe.2022.834270
                9009506
                35433653
                6fc354bc-411d-44cd-b574-87d53e9eee9e
                Copyright © 2022 Xin, Lopes, Wang, Wu, Zhu, Jiang, Miao, Lin, Cao, Zheng, Eliasy, Chen, Wang, Ye, Bao and Elsheikh.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 13 December 2021
                : 15 February 2022
                Categories
                Bioengineering and Biotechnology
                Original Research

                biomechanical response,in-vivo,tprk,fs-lasik,smile
                biomechanical response, in-vivo, tprk, fs-lasik, smile

                Comments

                Comment on this article