10
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Improving community-based first response to out of hospital cardiac arrest (FirstCPR): protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction

          Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is associated with poor survival outcomes, but prompt bystander action can more than double survival rates. Being trained, confident and willing-to-perform cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) are known predictors of bystander action. This study aims to assess the effectiveness of a community organisation targeted multicomponent education and training initiative on being willing to respond to OHCAs. The study employs a novel approach to reaching community members via social and cultural groups, and the intervention aims to address commonly cited barriers to training including lack of availability, time and costs.

          Methods and analysis

          FirstCPR is a cluster randomised trial that will be conducted across 200 community groups in urban and regional Australia. It will target community groups where CPR training is not usual. Community groups (clusters) will be stratified by region, size and organisation type, and then randomly assigned to either immediately receive the intervention programme, comprising digital and in-person education and training opportunities about CPR and OHCA over 12 months, or a delayed programme implementation. The primary outcome is self-reported ‘training and willingness-to-perform CPR’ at 12 months. It will be assessed through surveys of group members that consent in intervention versus control groups and administered prior to control groups receiving the intervention. The primary analysis will follow intention-to-treat principles, use log binomial regression accounting for baseline covariates and be conducted at the individual level, while accounting for clustering within communities. Focus groups and interviews will be conducted to examine barriers and enablers to implementation and costs will also be examined.

          Ethics and dissemination

          Ethical approval was obtained from The University of Sydney. Findings from this study will be disseminated via presentations at scientific conferences, publications in peer-reviewed journals, scientific and lay reports.

          Trial registration number

          ACTRN12621000367842.

          Related collections

          Most cited references53

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          The behaviour change wheel: A new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions

          Background Improving the design and implementation of evidence-based practice depends on successful behaviour change interventions. This requires an appropriate method for characterising interventions and linking them to an analysis of the targeted behaviour. There exists a plethora of frameworks of behaviour change interventions, but it is not clear how well they serve this purpose. This paper evaluates these frameworks, and develops and evaluates a new framework aimed at overcoming their limitations. Methods A systematic search of electronic databases and consultation with behaviour change experts were used to identify frameworks of behaviour change interventions. These were evaluated according to three criteria: comprehensiveness, coherence, and a clear link to an overarching model of behaviour. A new framework was developed to meet these criteria. The reliability with which it could be applied was examined in two domains of behaviour change: tobacco control and obesity. Results Nineteen frameworks were identified covering nine intervention functions and seven policy categories that could enable those interventions. None of the frameworks reviewed covered the full range of intervention functions or policies, and only a minority met the criteria of coherence or linkage to a model of behaviour. At the centre of a proposed new framework is a 'behaviour system' involving three essential conditions: capability, opportunity, and motivation (what we term the 'COM-B system'). This forms the hub of a 'behaviour change wheel' (BCW) around which are positioned the nine intervention functions aimed at addressing deficits in one or more of these conditions; around this are placed seven categories of policy that could enable those interventions to occur. The BCW was used reliably to characterise interventions within the English Department of Health's 2010 tobacco control strategy and the National Institute of Health and Clinical Excellence's guidance on reducing obesity. Conclusions Interventions and policies to change behaviour can be usefully characterised by means of a BCW comprising: a 'behaviour system' at the hub, encircled by intervention functions and then by policy categories. Research is needed to establish how far the BCW can lead to more efficient design of effective interventions.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials

            High quality protocols facilitate proper conduct, reporting, and external review of clinical trials. However, the completeness of trial protocols is often inadequate. To help improve the content and quality of protocols, an international group of stakeholders developed the SPIRIT 2013 Statement (Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials). The SPIRIT Statement provides guidance in the form of a checklist of recommended items to include in a clinical trial protocol. This SPIRIT 2013 Explanation and Elaboration paper provides important information to promote full understanding of the checklist recommendations. For each checklist item, we provide a rationale and detailed description; a model example from an actual protocol; and relevant references supporting its importance. We strongly recommend that this explanatory paper be used in conjunction with the SPIRIT Statement. A website of resources is also available (www.spirit-statement.org). The SPIRIT 2013 Explanation and Elaboration paper, together with the Statement, should help with the drafting of trial protocols. Complete documentation of key trial elements can facilitate transparency and protocol review for the benefit of all stakeholders.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Health promotion by social cognitive means.

              This article examines health promotion and disease prevention from the perspective of social cognitive theory. This theory posits a multifaceted causal structure in which self-efficacy beliefs operate together with goals, outcome expectations, and perceived environmental impediments and facilitators in the regulation of human motivation, behavior, and well-being. Belief in one's efficacy to exercise control is a common pathway through which psychosocial influences affect health functioning. This core belief affects each of the basic processes of personal change--whether people even consider changing their health habits, whether they mobilize the motivation and perseverance needed to succeed should they do so, their ability to recover from setbacks and relapses, and how well they maintain the habit changes they have achieved. Human health is a social matter, not just an individual one. A comprehensive approach to health promotion also requires changing the practices of social systems that have widespread effects on human health.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                BMJ Open
                BMJ Open
                bmjopen
                bmjopen
                BMJ Open
                BMJ Publishing Group (BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR )
                2044-6055
                2022
                8 June 2022
                : 12
                : 6
                : e057175
                Affiliations
                [1 ]departmentWestmead Applied Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health , The University of Sydney , Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
                [2 ]departmentSchool of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health , The University of Sydney , Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
                [3 ]departmentThe George Institute for Global Health , University of New South Wales , Newtown, New South Wales, Australia
                [4 ]departmentDepartment of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine , Monash University , Clayton, Victoria, Australia
                [5 ]departmentSchool of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health , The University of Sydney , Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
                [6 ]departmentDepartment of Emergency Medicine , Westmead Hospital , Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
                [7 ]departmentDepartment of Cardiology , Westmead Hospital , Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
                [8 ]departmentNSW Division , Heart Foundation , Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
                [9 ]departmentSydney Health Partners, Charles Perkins Centre , The University of Sydney , Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
                [10 ]departmentCentre for Epidemiology and Evidence , NSW Ministry of Health , Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
                [11 ]departmentEmergency Department , Ingham Institute , Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia
                [12 ]The MARCS Institute for Brain, Behaviour and Development , Milperra, New South Wales, Australia
                [13 ]departmentNSW Data Analytics Centre , NSW Government , Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
                [14 ]departmentAgnes Ginges Centre for Molecular Cardiology, Centenary Institute , The University of Sydney , Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
                [15 ]Ambulance Service of NSW , Rozelle, New South Wales, Australia
                Author notes
                [Correspondence to ] Professor Clara Chow; clara.chow@ 123456sydney.edu.au
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5439-2802
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8707-5563
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7188-7740
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5484-9144
                Article
                bmjopen-2021-057175
                10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057175
                9185498
                35680270
                c9d628b2-05e0-42bd-acfc-f627c75d78d4
                © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

                This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See:  http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

                History
                : 07 September 2021
                : 16 April 2022
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000925, National Health and Medical Research Council;
                Award ID: APP1168950
                Categories
                Public Health
                1506
                1724
                Protocol
                Custom metadata
                unlocked

                Medicine
                public health,education & training (see medical education & training),cardiology
                Medicine
                public health, education & training (see medical education & training), cardiology

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_

                Similar content142

                Cited by4

                Most referenced authors937