Antibody Response to the BA.5 Bivalent Vaccine Shot: a Two-Year Follow-Up Study following Initial COVID-19 mRNA Vaccination

There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

ABSTRACT

Although many studies have been conducted on the increase in spike antibody levels after vaccination, there is insufficient prospective and longitudinal information on the BA.5-adapted bivalent vaccine up to the fifth vaccination. In this study, we conducted a follow-up study of spike antibody levels and infection history in 46 health care workers who received up to 5 vaccinations. Monovalent vaccines were administered for the first to fourth vaccinations, and a bivalent vaccine was administered for the fifth vaccination. 11 serum samples were collected from each participant, and antibody levels were measured in a total of 506 serum samples. During the observation period, 43 of the 46 health care workers had no infection history, and 3 had a history of infection. Spike antibody levels peaked at 1 week after the second booster vaccination and gradually declined until the 27th week after the second vaccination. After 2 weeks following the fifth BA.5-adapted bivalent vaccine, the spike antibody levels significantly increased (median: 23,756 [IQR: 16,450 to 37,326]), compared to those measured before vaccination (median: 9,354 [IQR: 5,904 to 15,784]) (paired Wilcoxon signed-rank test, P = 5.7 × 10 ⁻¹⁴). These changes in antibody kinetics were observed regardless of age or sex. These results suggest that booster vaccination increased the spike antibody levels. Regular vaccination is effective in maintaining long-term antibody levels.

IMPORTANCE A COVID-19 bivalent mRNA vaccine was developed and administered to health care workers. The COVID-19 mRNA vaccine induces a robust antibody response. However, little is known about the antibody response to vaccines in serially collected blood samples from the same individuals. Here, we provide two-year follow-up data on the humoral immune response to COVID-19 mRNA vaccines in health care workers who received up to five vaccinations, including the BA.5-adapted bivalent vaccine. The results suggest that regular vaccination is effective in maintaining long-term antibody levels and have implications for vaccine efficacy and booster dose strategies in health care settings.

Related collections

Most cited references 21

Record: found
Abstract: found
Article: not found

Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine

Fernando P Polack, Stephen J. Thomas, Nicholas R.E. Kitchin … (2023)

Abstract Background Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection and the resulting coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) have afflicted tens of millions of people in a worldwide pandemic. Safe and effective vaccines are needed urgently. Methods In an ongoing multinational, placebo-controlled, observer-blinded, pivotal efficacy trial, we randomly assigned persons 16 years of age or older in a 1:1 ratio to receive two doses, 21 days apart, of either placebo or the BNT162b2 vaccine candidate (30 μg per dose). BNT162b2 is a lipid nanoparticle–formulated, nucleoside-modified RNA vaccine that encodes a prefusion stabilized, membrane-anchored SARS-CoV-2 full-length spike protein. The primary end points were efficacy of the vaccine against laboratory-confirmed Covid-19 and safety. Results A total of 43,548 participants underwent randomization, of whom 43,448 received injections: 21,720 with BNT162b2 and 21,728 with placebo. There were 8 cases of Covid-19 with onset at least 7 days after the second dose among participants assigned to receive BNT162b2 and 162 cases among those assigned to placebo; BNT162b2 was 95% effective in preventing Covid-19 (95% credible interval, 90.3 to 97.6). Similar vaccine efficacy (generally 90 to 100%) was observed across subgroups defined by age, sex, race, ethnicity, baseline body-mass index, and the presence of coexisting conditions. Among 10 cases of severe Covid-19 with onset after the first dose, 9 occurred in placebo recipients and 1 in a BNT162b2 recipient. The safety profile of BNT162b2 was characterized by short-term, mild-to-moderate pain at the injection site, fatigue, and headache. The incidence of serious adverse events was low and was similar in the vaccine and placebo groups. Conclusions A two-dose regimen of BNT162b2 conferred 95% protection against Covid-19 in persons 16 years of age or older. Safety over a median of 2 months was similar to that of other viral vaccines. (Funded by BioNTech and Pfizer; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04368728.)

0 comments Cited 7188 times – based on 0 reviews      Review now

Bookmark

Record: found
Abstract: found
Article: not found

Efficacy and Safety of the mRNA-1273 SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine

Lindsey Baden, Hana El Sahly, Brandon Essink … (2020)

Abstract Background Vaccines are needed to prevent coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) and to protect persons who are at high risk for complications. The mRNA-1273 vaccine is a lipid nanoparticle–encapsulated mRNA-based vaccine that encodes the prefusion stabilized full-length spike protein of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the virus that causes Covid-19. Methods This phase 3 randomized, observer-blinded, placebo-controlled trial was conducted at 99 centers across the United States. Persons at high risk for SARS-CoV-2 infection or its complications were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive two intramuscular injections of mRNA-1273 (100 μg) or placebo 28 days apart. The primary end point was prevention of Covid-19 illness with onset at least 14 days after the second injection in participants who had not previously been infected with SARS-CoV-2. Results The trial enrolled 30,420 volunteers who were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either vaccine or placebo (15,210 participants in each group). More than 96% of participants received both injections, and 2.2% had evidence (serologic, virologic, or both) of SARS-CoV-2 infection at baseline. Symptomatic Covid-19 illness was confirmed in 185 participants in the placebo group (56.5 per 1000 person-years; 95% confidence interval [CI], 48.7 to 65.3) and in 11 participants in the mRNA-1273 group (3.3 per 1000 person-years; 95% CI, 1.7 to 6.0); vaccine efficacy was 94.1% (95% CI, 89.3 to 96.8%; P<0.001). Efficacy was similar across key secondary analyses, including assessment 14 days after the first dose, analyses that included participants who had evidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection at baseline, and analyses in participants 65 years of age or older. Severe Covid-19 occurred in 30 participants, with one fatality; all 30 were in the placebo group. Moderate, transient reactogenicity after vaccination occurred more frequently in the mRNA-1273 group. Serious adverse events were rare, and the incidence was similar in the two groups. Conclusions The mRNA-1273 vaccine showed 94.1% efficacy at preventing Covid-19 illness, including severe disease. Aside from transient local and systemic reactions, no safety concerns were identified. (Funded by the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; COVE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04470427.)

0 comments Cited 4953 times – based on 0 reviews      Review now

Bookmark

Record: found
Abstract: found
Article: found

Is Open Access

Omicron extensively but incompletely escapes Pfizer BNT162b2 neutralization

Sandile Cele, Laurelle Jackson, David Khoury … (2021)

The emergence of the SARS-CoV-2 variant of concern Omicron (Pango lineage B.1.1.529), first identified in Botswana and South Africa, may compromise vaccine effectiveness and lead to re-infections 1 . Here we investigated Omicron escape from neutralization by antibodies from South African individuals vaccinated with Pfizer BNT162b2. We used blood samples taken soon after vaccination from individuals who were vaccinated and previously infected with SARS-CoV-2 or vaccinated with no evidence of previous infection. We isolated and sequence-confirmed live Omicron virus from an infected person and observed that Omicron requires the angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptor to infect cells. We compared plasma neutralization of Omicron relative to an ancestral SARS-CoV-2 strain and found that neutralization of ancestral virus was much higher in infected and vaccinated individuals compared with the vaccinated-only participants. However, both groups showed a 22-fold reduction in vaccine-elicited neutralization by the Omicron variant. Participants who were vaccinated and had previously been infected exhibited residual neutralization of Omicron similar to the level of neutralization of the ancestral virus observed in the vaccination-only group. These data support the notion that reasonable protection against Omicron may be maintained using vaccination approaches.

0 comments Cited 564 times – based on 0 reviews      Review now

Bookmark

All references

Author and article information

Contributors

Yosuke Hirotsu:

ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8002-834X

Takamasa Ueno: Role: Editor

Marco Becherelli: Role: ad hoc peer reviewer

Journal

Journal ID (nlm-ta): Microbiol Spectr

Journal ID (iso-abbrev): Microbiol Spectr

Journal ID (publisher-id): spectrum

Title: Microbiology Spectrum

Publisher: American Society for Microbiology (1752 N St., N.W., Washington, DC )

ISSN (Electronic): 2165-0497

Publication date (Electronic, pub): 16 May 2023

Publication date (Electronic, collection): May-Jun 2023

Publication date PMC-release: 16 May 2023

Volume: 11

Issue: 3

Electronic Location Identifier: e01316-23

Affiliations

[a ] Genome Analysis Center, Yamanashi Central Hospital, Kofu, Japan

[b ] Division of Clinical Biochemistry and Immunology, Yamanashi Central Hospital, Kofu, Japan

[c ] Division of Infection Control and Prevention, Yamanashi Central Hospital, Kofu, Japan

[d ] Central Clinical Laboratory, Yamanashi Central Hospital, Kofu, Japan

[e ] Department of Gastroenterology, Yamanashi Central Hospital, Kofu, Japan

[f ] The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan

Kumamoto Daigaku

GlaxoSmithKline USA

Author notes

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Author information

Yosuke Hirotsu https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8002-834X

Article

Publisher ID: 01316-23 Publisher ID: spectrum.01316-23

DOI: 10.1128/spectrum.01316-23

PMC ID: 10269437

PubMed ID: 37191496

SO-VID: c9adbbd5-915d-48fa-b48f-ef35f05371b2

License:

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

History

Date received : 27 March 2023

Date accepted : 27 April 2023

Page count

supplementary-material: 0, Figures: 1, Tables: 1, Equations: 0, References: 21, Pages: 6, Words: 3254

Funding

Funded by: MEXT | Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS), FundRef https://doi.org/10.13039/501100001691;

Award ID: JP18K16292