22
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Antigenic cartography of SARS-CoV-2 reveals that Omicron BA.1 and BA.2 are antigenically distinct

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The emergence and rapid spread of SARS-CoV-2 variants may impact vaccine efficacy significantly. The Omicron variant termed BA.2, which differs substantially from BA.1 based on genetic sequence, is currently replacing BA.1 in several countries, but its antigenic characteristics have not yet been assessed. Here, we used antigenic cartography to quantify and visualize antigenic differences between early SARS-CoV-2 variants (614G, Alpha, Beta, Gamma, Zeta, Delta and Mu) using hamster antisera obtained after primary infection. We first verified that the choice of the cell line for the neutralization assay did not affect the topology of the map substantially. Antigenic maps generated using pseudotyped SARS-CoV-2 on the widely used VeroE6 cell line and the human airway cell line Calu-3 generated similar maps. Maps made using authentic SARS-CoV-2 on Calu-3 cells also closely resembled those generated with pseudotyped viruses. The antigenic maps revealed a central cluster of SARS-CoV-2 variants, which grouped based on mutual spike mutations. Whereas these early variants are antigenically similar, clustering relatively close to each other in antigenic space, Omicron BA.1 and BA.2 have evolved as two distinct antigenic outliers. Our data show that BA.1 and BA.2 both escape vaccine-induced antibody responses as a result of different antigenic characteristics. Thus, antigenic cartography could be used to assess antigenic properties of future SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern that emerge and to decide on the composition of novel spike-based (booster) vaccines.

          Abstract

          Antigenic evolution by SARS-CoV-2 can be monitored by antigenic cartography, informing future coronavirus vaccine strain selections.

          Abstract

          Related collections

          Most cited references36

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Detection of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) by real-time RT-PCR

          Background The ongoing outbreak of the recently emerged novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) poses a challenge for public health laboratories as virus isolates are unavailable while there is growing evidence that the outbreak is more widespread than initially thought, and international spread through travellers does already occur. Aim We aimed to develop and deploy robust diagnostic methodology for use in public health laboratory settings without having virus material available. Methods Here we present a validated diagnostic workflow for 2019-nCoV, its design relying on close genetic relatedness of 2019-nCoV with SARS coronavirus, making use of synthetic nucleic acid technology. Results The workflow reliably detects 2019-nCoV, and further discriminates 2019-nCoV from SARS-CoV. Through coordination between academic and public laboratories, we confirmed assay exclusivity based on 297 original clinical specimens containing a full spectrum of human respiratory viruses. Control material is made available through European Virus Archive – Global (EVAg), a European Union infrastructure project. Conclusion The present study demonstrates the enormous response capacity achieved through coordination of academic and public laboratories in national and European research networks.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Tracking changes in SARS-CoV-2 Spike: evidence that D614G increases infectivity of the COVID-19 virus

            Summary A SARS-CoV-2 variant carrying the Spike protein amino acid change D614G has become the most prevalent form in the global pandemic. Dynamic tracking of variant frequencies revealed a recurrent pattern of G614 increase at multiple geographic levels: national, regional and municipal. The shift occurred even in local epidemics where the original D614 form was well established prior to the introduction of the G614 variant. The consistency of this pattern was highly statistically significant, suggesting that the G614 variant may have a fitness advantage. We found that the G614 variant grows to higher titer as pseudotyped virions. In infected individuals G614 is associated with lower RT-PCR cycle thresholds, suggestive of higher upper respiratory tract viral loads, although not with increased disease severity. These findings illuminate changes important for a mechanistic understanding of the virus, and support continuing surveillance of Spike mutations to aid in the development of immunological interventions.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Reduced sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 variant Delta to antibody neutralization

              The SARS-CoV-2 B.1.617 lineage was identified in October 2020 in India1-5. Since then, it has become dominant in some regions of India and in the UK, and has spread to many other countries6. The lineage includes three main subtypes (B1.617.1, B.1.617.2 and B.1.617.3), which contain diverse mutations in the N-terminal domain (NTD) and the receptor-binding domain (RBD) of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein that may increase the immune evasion potential of these variants. B.1.617.2-also termed the Delta variant-is believed to spread faster than other variants. Here we isolated an infectious strain of the Delta variant from an individual with COVID-19 who had returned to France from India. We examined the sensitivity of this strain to monoclonal antibodies and to antibodies present in sera from individuals who had recovered from COVID-19 (hereafter referred to as convalescent individuals) or who had received a COVID-19 vaccine, and then compared this strain with other strains of SARS-CoV-2. The Delta variant was resistant to neutralization by some anti-NTD and anti-RBD monoclonal antibodies, including bamlanivimab, and these antibodies showed impaired binding to the spike protein. Sera collected from convalescent individuals up to 12 months after the onset of symptoms were fourfold less potent against the Delta variant relative to the Alpha variant (B.1.1.7). Sera from individuals who had received one dose of the Pfizer or the AstraZeneca vaccine had a barely discernible inhibitory effect on the Delta variant. Administration of two doses of the vaccine generated a neutralizing response in 95% of individuals, with titres three- to fivefold lower against the Delta variant than against the Alpha variant. Thus, the spread of the Delta variant is associated with an escape from antibodies that target non-RBD and RBD epitopes of the spike protein.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Formal analysisRole: InvestigationRole: VisualizationRole: Writing - original draftRole: Writing - review & editing
                Role: Formal analysisRole: InvestigationRole: ResourcesRole: ValidationRole: Writing - review & editing
                Role: Formal analysisRole: InvestigationRole: MethodologyRole: SoftwareRole: VisualizationRole: Writing - review & editing
                Role: Data curationRole: Formal analysisRole: InvestigationRole: MethodologyRole: VisualizationRole: Writing - review & editing
                Role: Investigation
                Role: Investigation
                Role: Investigation
                Role: Resources
                Role: InvestigationRole: MethodologyRole: ValidationRole: Writing - review & editing
                Role: Formal analysisRole: InvestigationRole: Resources
                Role: Formal analysisRole: InvestigationRole: Resources
                Role: InvestigationRole: ResourcesRole: Writing - review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Resources
                Role: Funding acquisitionRole: InvestigationRole: MethodologyRole: ResourcesRole: Writing - review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: InvestigationRole: MethodologyRole: ResourcesRole: Supervision
                Role: MethodologyRole: ResourcesRole: SoftwareRole: Writing - review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Data curationRole: Funding acquisitionRole: MethodologyRole: Project administrationRole: ResourcesRole: SupervisionRole: VisualizationRole: Writing - review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: InvestigationRole: MethodologyRole: Project administrationRole: ResourcesRole: SupervisionRole: ValidationRole: Writing - review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Data curationRole: InvestigationRole: MethodologyRole: ResourcesRole: ValidationRole: VisualizationRole: Writing - original draftRole: Writing - review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Funding acquisitionRole: MethodologyRole: Project administrationRole: SoftwareRole: SupervisionRole: Writing - review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Funding acquisitionRole: MethodologyRole: Project administrationRole: SupervisionRole: ValidationRole: VisualizationRole: Writing - original draftRole: Writing - review & editing
                Journal
                Sci Immunol
                Sci Immunol
                sciimmunol
                immunology
                Science Immunology
                American Association for the Advancement of Science
                2470-9468
                23 June 2022
                23 June 2022
                : eabq4450
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ]Viroscience Department, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
                [ 2 ]Department of Neurology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
                [ 3 ]Department of Pathology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
                [ 4 ]Center for Pathogen Evolution, Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 3EJ, UK
                Author notes
                [†]

                These authors contributed equally to this work.

                [* ]Corresponding author. Email: b.haagmans@ 123456erasmusmc.nl
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7188-6871
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5298-5919
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3635-7952
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3469-7822
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6449-4765
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5558-7043
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5735-5537
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3465-6409
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0449-8822
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6814-0996
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9004-3850
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9394-1189
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2817-0127
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7678-314X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2393-1890
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5204-2312
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2463-027X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1431-4022
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8095-2869
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6221-2015
                Article
                abq4450
                10.1126/sciimmunol.abq4450
                9273038
                35737747
                2de7ab45-5856-4f95-900c-ef3895abba88
                Copyright © 2022 The Authors, some rights reserved; exclusive licensee American Association for the Advancement of Science. No claim to original U.S. Government Works

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 08 April 2022
                : 14 June 2022
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000002, National Institutes of Health;
                Award ID: 75N93021C00014
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100010661, Horizon 2020 Framework Programme;
                Award ID: 101003589
                Funded by: FundRef , Health Holland;
                Award ID: EMCLHS20017
                Funded by: FundRef , Health Holland;
                Award ID: LSHM19136
                Funded by: FundRef , Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development ZONMW;
                Award ID: 10150062010008
                Categories
                Reports
                Reports
                Reports
                Coronavirus
                Custom metadata
                True

                Comments

                Comment on this article