Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Differences in Long COVID severity by duration of illness, symptom evolution, and vaccination: a longitudinal cohort study from the INSPIRE group

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Summary

          Background

          Although short-term outcomes of Long COVID have been described, longer-term physical and mental health outcomes of Long COVID are less well-established. This study sought to assess differences in long-term physical and mental health outcomes extending up to three years among those with current, resolved, and no Long COVID, as well as duration of Long COVID and vaccination status.

          Methods

          This was a prospective, multisite, study of participants with SARS-CoV-2 infection from 12/7/2020-8/29/2022, with data collected through 4/2/2024. Surveys included validated tools for physical and mental health. Data were analyzed by Long COVID status (never-had, resolved, current), Long COVID duration and vaccination status.

          Findings

          Of 3663 participants, 2604 (71.1%) never had Long COVID, 994 (27.1%) reported current Long COVID, and 65 (1.8%) reported resolved Long COVID. Compared to never having Long COVID, current Long COVID had lower/worse scores for Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) version 29 Physical (7.8; 95% confidence interval [CI] 7.3–8.3) and Mental Health (9.4; 95% CI 8.8–10.1) and higher likelihood of moderate-to-high stress (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 2.0; 95% CI 1.6–2.4), moderate-to-high loneliness (aOR: 1.6; 95% CI 1.4–2.0), moderate-to-severe fatigue (aOR: 3.0; 95% CI 2.5–3.7), insufficient activity (aOR for Speedy Nutrition and Physical Activity Assessment ≤4: 0.6; 95% CI 0.5–0.7; aOR for Exercise Vital Sign ≤150 min/week: 0.7, 95% CI 0.6–1.0), and worse dyspnea (aOR: 5.0; 95% CI 4.3–5.8). Resolved Long COVID had lower scores for PROMIS Physical by 2.0 (95% CI 0.2–3.8) and Mental Health by 2.3 (95% CI 0.2–4.4) than the never-had-Long COVID cohort. Number of COVID-19 vaccinations was associated with better outcomes across all measures.

          Interpretation

          Among participants followed up to 3 years after initial infection, those with current Long COVID had worse physical and mental health outcomes. The majority of those with Long COVID did not resolve, with less than 2% having resolved Long COVID. The resolved Long COVID cohort had moderately worse physical and mental health compared with those never-having-Long COVID. COVID-19 vaccination was associated with better outcomes.

          Funding

          doi 10.13039/100000030, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; .

          Related collections

          Most cited references30

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) developed and tested its first wave of adult self-reported health outcome item banks: 2005-2008.

          Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are essential when evaluating many new treatments in health care; yet, current measures have been limited by a lack of precision, standardization, and comparability of scores across studies and diseases. The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) provides item banks that offer the potential for efficient (minimizes item number without compromising reliability), flexible (enables optional use of interchangeable items), and precise (has minimal error in estimate) measurement of commonly studied PROs. We report results from the first large-scale testing of PROMIS items. Fourteen item pools were tested in the U.S. general population and clinical groups using an online panel and clinic recruitment. A scale-setting subsample was created reflecting demographics proportional to the 2000 U.S. census. Using item-response theory (graded response model), 11 item banks were calibrated on a sample of 21,133, measuring components of self-reported physical, mental, and social health, along with a 10-item Global Health Scale. Short forms from each bank were developed and compared with the overall bank and with other well-validated and widely accepted ("legacy") measures. All item banks demonstrated good reliability across most of the score distributions. Construct validity was supported by moderate to strong correlations with legacy measures. PROMIS item banks and their short forms provide evidence that they are reliable and precise measures of generic symptoms and functional reports comparable to legacy instruments. Further testing will continue to validate and test PROMIS items and banks in diverse clinical populations. Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The revised UCLA Loneliness Scale: concurrent and discriminant validity evidence.

            The development of an adequate assessment instrument is a necessary prerequisite for social psychological research on loneliness. Two studies provide methodological refinement in the measurement of loneliness. Study 1 presents a revised version of the self-report UCLA (University of California, Los Angeles) Loneliness Scale, designed to counter the possible effects of response bias in the original scale, and reports concurrent validity evidence for the revised measure. Study 2 demonstrates that although loneliness is correlated with measures of negative affect, social risk taking, and affiliative tendencies, it is nonetheless a distinct psychological experience.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Development of physical and mental health summary scores from the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) global items

              Background The use of global health items permits an efficient way of gathering general perceptions of health. These items provide useful summary information about health and are predictive of health care utilization and subsequent mortality. Methods Analyses of 10 self-reported global health items obtained from an internet survey as part of the Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) project. We derived summary scores from the global health items. We estimated the associations of the summary scores with the EQ-5D index score and the PROMIS physical function, pain, fatigue, emotional distress, and social health domain scores. Results Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses supported a two-factor model. Global physical health (GPH; 4 items on overall physical health, physical function, pain, and fatigue) and global mental health (GMH; 4 items on quality of life, mental health, satisfaction with social activities, and emotional problems) scales were created. The scales had internal consistency reliability coefficients of 0.81 and 0.86, respectively. GPH correlated more strongly with the EQ-5D than did GMH (r = 0.76 vs. 0.59). GPH correlated most strongly with pain impact (r = −0.75) whereas GMH correlated most strongly with depressive symptoms (r = −0.71). Conclusions Two dimensions representing physical and mental health underlie the global health items in PROMIS. These global health scales can be used to efficiently summarize physical and mental health in patient-reported outcome studies.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Lancet Reg Health Am
                Lancet Reg Health Am
                Lancet Regional Health - Americas
                Elsevier
                2667-193X
                14 February 2025
                April 2025
                14 February 2025
                : 44
                : 101026
                Affiliations
                [a ]Department of Emergency Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
                [b ]Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Yale School of Medicine New Haven, CT, USA
                [c ]Yale Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, New Haven, CT, USA
                [d ]Department of Family Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
                [e ]Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
                [f ]Department of Emergency Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
                [g ]Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
                [h ]National Center for Immunizations and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control & Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
                [i ]Departments of Emergency Medicine and Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
                [j ]Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, USA
                [k ]Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
                [l ]Department of Emergency Medicine, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Philadelphia, PA, USA
                [m ]Center for Connected Care, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
                [n ]Department of Emergency Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, USA
                [o ]Department of Emergency Medicine, McGovern Medical School at UTHealth Houston, USA
                [p ]Department of Medicine, Cook County Hospital, Chicago, IL, USA
                Author notes
                []Corresponding author. 1750 West Harrison Street, Suite 108 Kellogg, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA. MichaelGottliebMD@ 123456Gmail.com
                Article
                S2667-193X(25)00036-5 101026
                10.1016/j.lana.2025.101026
                11875141
                40040820
                c98ba663-9edf-49e3-862b-47429b995ffc
                © 2025 The Author(s)

                This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 14 October 2024
                : 28 January 2025
                : 29 January 2025
                Categories
                Articles

                sars-cov-2,long covid,promis,physical health,mental health
                sars-cov-2, long covid, promis, physical health, mental health

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content79

                Most referenced authors526