Cumulative In-Hospital Costs Associated With Single-Ventricle Palliation

Abstract

Background

In the SVR (Single Ventricle Reconstruction) Trial, 1-year survival in recipients of right ventricle to pulmonary artery shunts (RVPAS) was superior to that in those receiving modified Blalock-Taussig-Thomas shunts (MBTTS), but not in subsequent follow-up. Cost analysis is an expedient means of evaluating value and morbidity.

Objectives

The purpose of this study was to evaluate differences in cumulative hospital costs between RVPAS and MBTTS.

Methods

Clinical data from SVR and costs from Pediatric Health Information Systems database were combined. Cumulative hospital costs and cost-per-day-alive were compared serially at 1, 3, and 5 years between RVPAS and MBTTS. Potential associations between patient-level factors and cost were explored with multivariable models.

Results

In total, 303 participants (55% of the SVR cohort) from 9 of 15 sites were studied (48% MBTTS). Observed total costs at 1 year were lower for MBTTS ($701,260 ± 442,081) than those for RVPAS ($804,062 ± 615,068), a difference that was not statistically significant ( P = 0.10). Total costs were also not significantly different at 3 and 5 years ( P = 0.21 and 0.32). Similarly, cost-per-day-alive did not differ significantly for either group at 1, 3, and 5 years (all P > 0.05). In analyses of transplant-free survivors, total costs and cost-per-day-alive were higher for RVPAS at 1 year ( P = 0.05 for both) but not at 3 and 5 years ( P > 0.05 for all). In multivariable models, aortic atresia and prematurity were associated with increased cost-per-day-alive across follow-up ( P < 0.05).

Conclusions

Total costs do not differ significantly between MBTTS and RVPAS. The magnitude of longitudinal costs underscores the importance of efforts to improve outcomes in this vulnerable population.

Central Illustration