12
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Development and initial psychometric validation of a patient-reported outcome measure for Crohn’s perianal fistula: the Crohn’s Anal Fistula Quality of Life (CAF-QoL) scale

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction

          Crohn’s perianal fistulas are challenging for patients and clinicians. Many do not respond to available treatments and despite recommendations by a global consensus, there are currently no specific patient-derived quality of life tools to measure response to treatment. We present a new validated patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) for this complicated disease phenotype.

          Methods

          A draft questionnaire was generated using unstructured qualitative patient interviews on the experience of living with Crohn’s perianal fistula, a nationwide multidisciplinary consensus exercise, a systematic review of outcomes assessing medical/surgical/combined treatment and a patient and public involvement day. Psychometric properties were assessed including construct validity (by comparison with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and the UK Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (UK-IBDQ)), and reliability and responsiveness was assessed by test–retest analysis.

          Results

          Data from 211 patients contributed to development of a final 28-item questionnaire. The Crohn’s Anal Fistula Quality of Life (CAF-QoL) demonstrated good internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha 0.88), excellent stability (intraclass correlation 0.98) and good responsiveness and construct validity, with positive correlation with the UK-IBDQ and HADS.

          Conclusion

          The CAF-QoL scale is ready for use as a PROM in research and clinical practice. It complements objective clinical evaluation of fistula by capturing impact on the patient.

          Related collections

          Most cited references42

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Understanding interobserver agreement: the kappa statistic.

          Items such as physical exam findings, radiographic interpretations, or other diagnostic tests often rely on some degree of subjective interpretation by observers. Studies that measure the agreement between two or more observers should include a statistic that takes into account the fact that observers will sometimes agree or disagree simply by chance. The kappa statistic (or kappa coefficient) is the most commonly used statistic for this purpose. A kappa of 1 indicates perfect agreement, whereas a kappa of 0 indicates agreement equivalent to chance. A limitation of kappa is that it is affected by the prevalence of the finding under observation. Methods to overcome this limitation have been described.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            A SIMPLE INDEX OF CROHN'S-DISEASE ACTIVITY

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The kappa statistic in reliability studies: use, interpretation, and sample size requirements.

              This article examines and illustrates the use and interpretation of the kappa statistic in musculoskeletal research. The reliability of clinicians' ratings is an important consideration in areas such as diagnosis and the interpretation of examination findings. Often, these ratings lie on a nominal or an ordinal scale. For such data, the kappa coefficient is an appropriate measure of reliability. Kappa is defined, in both weighted and unweighted forms, and its use is illustrated with examples from musculoskeletal research. Factors that can influence the magnitude of kappa (prevalence, bias, and non-independent ratings) are discussed, and ways of evaluating the magnitude of an obtained kappa are considered. The issue of statistical testing of kappa is considered, including the use of confidence intervals, and appropriate sample sizes for reliability studies using kappa are tabulated. The article concludes with recommendations for the use and interpretation of kappa.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Gut
                Gut
                gutjnl
                gut
                Gut
                BMJ Publishing Group (BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR )
                0017-5749
                1468-3288
                September 2021
                3 December 2020
                : 70
                : 9
                : 1649-1656
                Affiliations
                [1 ]departmentSurgery and Cancer , Imperial College London , London, UK
                [2 ]departmentRobin Phillips Fistula Research Unit , St Mark's Hospital and Academic Institute , London, UK
                [3 ]departmentFaculty of Education, Health and Human Sciences , University of Greenwich , London, UK
                [4 ]departmentFlorence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery and Palliative Care , King's College London , London, UK
                [5 ]CAF-QoL Patient and Public Involvement Team , London, UK
                Author notes
                [Correspondence to ] Dr Samuel O Adegbola, Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London W2 1NY, UK; samadeg@ 123456doctors.net.uk ; samuel.adegbola@ 123456nhs.net ; s.adegbola16@ 123456imperial.ac.uk
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2522-3895
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3885-5752
                Article
                gutjnl-2019-320553
                10.1136/gutjnl-2019-320553
                8355881
                33272978
                c7c3dc4e-3a55-4109-99c7-190b6453007d
                © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

                This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

                History
                : 23 December 2019
                : 22 August 2020
                : 29 October 2020
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000863, Bowel Disease Research Foundation;
                Award ID: DES008
                Categories
                Inflammatory Bowel Disease
                1506
                2312
                Original research
                Custom metadata
                unlocked

                Gastroenterology & Hepatology
                crohn's disease,quality of life,gastrointestinal fistulae
                Gastroenterology & Hepatology
                crohn's disease, quality of life, gastrointestinal fistulae

                Comments

                Comment on this article