1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Neurophysiological, balance and motion evidence in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: A systematic review

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is a spinal deformity that affects approximately 4% of the world’s population. Several hypotheses regarding the etiology of AIS have been investigated. In the last decades, impaired visual-spatial perception, alterations in spatial body orientation and sensory integration deficits have been documented.

          Objective

          We aimed to summarize the neurophysiological, balance, and motion evidence related to AIS published in the last fifteen years, between January 2008 and April 2023. Both observational and interventional studies were considered. Only studies using quantitative assessment methods, such as electroencephalography (EEG), electromyography (EMG), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), somatosensory evoked potentials, force platform, or motion capture, were included.

          Methods

          1250 eligible records identified from online database searching were filtered by duplicate removal, title and abstract screening, and qualitative analysis. 61 articles met the inclusion criteria (i.e., Cobb range 10°-35°, age range 10-18 years) and were summarized.

          Results

          We found significant evidence of impaired standing balance in individuals with AIS who greatly rely on visual and proprioceptive information to stay upright. EMG studies frequently reported an increased activity on the convex side of the intrinsic spinae muscles. EEG data show increased delta and theta power, higher alpha peak frequencies, and significant suppression in the alpha and beta bands in subjects with AIS during standing tasks. MRI studies report changes in white matter structures, differences in the vestibular system, and abnormal cortical activations over motor-related areas in subjects with AIS. Bracing appears to be an effective treatment for AIS, leading to improvements in static balance and gait. Methodological issues prevent reliable conclusions about the effects of other treatment options.

          Conclusions

          This review underscores the importance of quantitative assessment methods to explore the etiology and pathophysiology of AIS. Further research is needed to measure the impact of physical therapy and orthotic treatments on the neurophysiological mechanisms of the disease.

          Related collections

          Most cited references85

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            2016 SOSORT guidelines: orthopaedic and rehabilitation treatment of idiopathic scoliosis during growth

            Background The International Scientific Society on Scoliosis Orthopaedic and Rehabilitation Treatment (SOSORT) produced its first guidelines in 2005 and renewed them in 2011. Recently published high-quality clinical trials on the effect of conservative treatment approaches (braces and exercises) for idiopathic scoliosis prompted us to update the last guidelines’ version. The objective was to align the guidelines with the new scientific evidence to assure faster knowledge transfer into clinical practice of conservative treatment for idiopathic scoliosis (CTIS). Methods Physicians, researchers and allied health practitioners working in the area of CTIS were involved in the development of the 2016 guidelines. Multiple literature reviews reviewing the evidence on CTIS (assessment, bracing, physiotherapy, physiotherapeutic scoliosis-specific exercises (PSSE) and other CTIS) were conducted. Documents, recommendations and practical approach flow charts were developed using a Delphi procedure. The process was completed with the Consensus Session held during the first combined SOSORT/IRSSD Meeting held in Banff, Canada, in May 2016. Results The contents of the new 2016 guidelines include the following: background on idiopathic scoliosis, description of CTIS approaches for various populations with flow-charts for clinical practice, as well as literature reviews and recommendations on assessment, bracing, PSSE and other CTIS. The present guidelines include a total of 68 recommendations divided into following topics: bracing (n = 25), PSSE to prevent scoliosis progression during growth (n = 12), PSSE during brace treatment and surgical therapy (n = 6), other conservative treatments (n = 2), respiratory function and exercises (n = 3), general sport activities (n = 6); and assessment (n = 14). According to the agreed strength and level of evidence rating scale, there were 2 recommendations on bracing and 1 recommendation on PSSE that reached level of recommendation “I” and level of evidence “II”. Three recommendations reached strength of recommendation A based on the level of evidence I (2 for bracing and one for assessment); 39 recommendations reached strength of recommendation B (20 for bracing, 13 for PSSE, and 6 for assessment).The number of paper for each level of evidence for each treatment is shown in Table 8. Conclusion The 2016 SOSORT guidelines were developed based on the current evidence on CTIS. Over the last 5 years, high-quality evidence has started to emerge, particularly in the areas of efficacy of bracing (one large multicentre trial) and PSSE (three single-centre randomized controlled trials). Several grade A recommendations were presented. Despite the growing high-quality evidence, the heterogeneity of the study protocols limits generalizability of the recommendations. There is a need for standardization of research methods of conservative treatment effectiveness, as recognized by SOSORT and the Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) non-operative management Committee. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s13013-017-0145-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Scoliosis: Review of diagnosis and treatment.

              Scoliosis is a spinal deformity consisting of lateral curvature and rotation of the vertebrae. The causes of scoliosis vary and are classified broadly as congenital, neuromuscular, syndrome-related, idiopathic and spinal curvature due to secondary reasons. The majority of scoliosis cases encountered by the general practitioner will be idiopathic. The natural history relates to the etiology and age at presentation, and usually dictates the treatment. However, it is the patient's history, physical examination and radiographs that are critical in the initial evaluation of scoliosis, and in determining which patients need additional considerations. Scoliosis with a primary diagnosis (nonidiopathic) must be recognized by the physician to identify the causes, which may require intervention. Patients with congenital scoliosis must be evaluated for cardiac and renal abnormalities. School screening for scoliosis is controversial and is falling out of favour. The treatment for idiopathic scoliosis is based on age, curve magnitude and risk of progression, and includes observation, orthotic management and surgical correction with fusion. A child should be referred to a specialist if the curve is greater than 10 degrees in a patient younger than 10 years of age, is greater than 20 degrees in a patient 10 years of age or older, has atypical features or is associated with back pain or neurological abnormalities.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: InvestigationRole: MethodologyRole: Project administrationRole: VisualizationRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Data curationRole: Formal analysisRole: MethodologyRole: Project administrationRole: SoftwareRole: VisualizationRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: MethodologyRole: ValidationRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: MethodologyRole: SupervisionRole: ValidationRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: MethodologyRole: ValidationRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Funding acquisitionRole: ResourcesRole: SupervisionRole: ValidationRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Funding acquisitionRole: ResourcesRole: SupervisionRole: ValidationRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Funding acquisitionRole: ResourcesRole: SupervisionRole: ValidationRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS One
                plos
                PLOS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, CA USA )
                1932-6203
                2024
                22 May 2024
                : 19
                : 5
                : e0303086
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Department of Neurosciences, Section of Rehabilitation, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
                [2 ] Department of Information Engineering, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
                [3 ] Padova Neuroscience Center, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
                [4 ] Orthopedic Rehabilitation Unit, Padova University Hospital, Padova, Italy
                [5 ] Ospedale Riabilitativo di Alta Specializzazione di Motta di Livenza, Motta di Livenza, Treviso, Italy
                Iran University of Medical Sciences, IRAN, ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF
                Author notes

                Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7653-9377
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2793-1334
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0744-3109
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3417-0388
                Article
                PONE-D-23-43892
                10.1371/journal.pone.0303086
                11111046
                38776317
                c75e91e8-bc29-4a91-8165-c772eccc39bf
                © 2024 Paramento et al

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 12 January 2024
                : 19 April 2024
                Page count
                Figures: 2, Tables: 1, Pages: 19
                Funding
                Funded by: PRIN2022DM104
                Award ID: 2022MMNCKC
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: Fondo di Beneficienza Intesa San Paolo
                Award ID: B/2022/0205
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: REACT EU—PON “Ricerca e Innovazione” 2014–2020
                Award ID: DM 1062/2021
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: funder-id http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100007479, Fondazione Cassa di Risparmio di Padova e Rovigo;
                Award ID: MASI_CARIVARI21_01
                Award Recipient :
                MP - Fondazione Cassa di Risparmio di Padova e Rovigo, MASI_CARIVARI21_01 EP - Fondo di Beneficienza Intesa San Paolo under Grant B/2022/0205 MR - REACT EU—PON “Ricerca e Innovazione” 2014–2020, DM 1062/2021 SM - PRIN2022DM104 under Grant 2022MMNCKC. None of the sponsors or funders played any role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Physiology
                Biological Locomotion
                Gait Analysis
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Neuroscience
                Cognitive Science
                Cognitive Neuroscience
                Motor Reactions
                Postural Control
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Neuroscience
                Cognitive Neuroscience
                Motor Reactions
                Postural Control
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Physiology
                Electrophysiology
                Neurophysiology
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Neuroscience
                Neurophysiology
                Research and Analysis Methods
                Bioassays and Physiological Analysis
                Electrophysiological Techniques
                Muscle Electrophysiology
                Electromyography
                Research and Analysis Methods
                Bioassays and Physiological Analysis
                Electrophysiological Techniques
                Brain Electrophysiology
                Electroencephalography
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Physiology
                Electrophysiology
                Neurophysiology
                Brain Electrophysiology
                Electroencephalography
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Neuroscience
                Neurophysiology
                Brain Electrophysiology
                Electroencephalography
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Neuroscience
                Brain Mapping
                Electroencephalography
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Clinical Medicine
                Clinical Neurophysiology
                Electroencephalography
                Research and Analysis Methods
                Imaging Techniques
                Neuroimaging
                Electroencephalography
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Neuroscience
                Neuroimaging
                Electroencephalography
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Anatomy
                Nervous System
                Central Nervous System
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Anatomy
                Nervous System
                Central Nervous System
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Neuroscience
                Cognitive Science
                Cognitive Psychology
                Perception
                Sensory Perception
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Psychology
                Cognitive Psychology
                Perception
                Sensory Perception
                Social Sciences
                Psychology
                Cognitive Psychology
                Perception
                Sensory Perception
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Neuroscience
                Sensory Perception
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Neuroscience
                Cognitive Science
                Cognitive Psychology
                Perception
                Sensory Perception
                Vision
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Psychology
                Cognitive Psychology
                Perception
                Sensory Perception
                Vision
                Social Sciences
                Psychology
                Cognitive Psychology
                Perception
                Sensory Perception
                Vision
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Neuroscience
                Sensory Perception
                Vision
                Custom metadata
                All data extraction forms are available on the Open Science Framework (OSF) and can be accessed at the following link: https://osf.io/38z96/.

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article