9
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Muscle involvement in limb-girdle muscular dystrophy with GMPPB deficiency (LGMD2T)

      research-article
      , BSc , , PhD, , MD, , PhD, , PhD, , PharmD, , PhD, , MD, , DMSc, , PhD, , DMSc
      Neurology: Genetics
      Wolters Kluwer

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective:

          In this study, muscle involvement assessed by MRI and levels of GMPPB and glycosylation of α-dystroglycan expression in muscle were examined in patients with limb-girdle muscular dystrophy (LGMD) type 2T.

          Methods:

          Six new patients with genetically verified mutations in GMPPB were studied. T1-weighted magnetic resonance images were obtained in 4 participants. Muscle strength and potential involvement of extramuscular organs were examined. Glycosylation of α-dystroglycan in muscle was studied, and GMPPB and α-dystroglycan expression was analyzed by Western blotting. Prevalence of LGMD2T was calculated from the total LGMD population in Denmark. GMPPB was sequenced in all unclassified cases.

          Results:

          Two patients carried 3 new mutations in GMPPB. The other 4 patients carried previously described pathogenic mutations in GMPPB. MRI showed that the paraspinal muscles were the most affected, followed by involvement of hamstrings. Our results showed a loss of glycosylation of α-dystroglycan as well as secondary loss of merosin expression on Western blotting. The prevalence of LGMD2T in the Danish cohort of patients with LGMD is 1.5%.

          Conclusions:

          The new findings of this study are (1) the consistent finding of a preferential affection of paraspinal and hamstring muscles in LGMD2T, (2) 3 new mutations in GMPPB, (3) variable loss of glycosylation tested with IIH6 and VIA4 antibodies, and (4) a prevalence of LGMD2T of 1.5% in a well-characterized Danish LGMD cohort.

          Related collections

          Most cited references6

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Clinical and imaging findings in six cases of congenital muscular dystrophy with rigid spine syndrome linked to chromosome 1p (RSMD1).

          We report clinical and imaging findings in six cases from five families affected by the form of congenital muscular dystrophy with rigid spine linked to the locus rigid spine muscular dystrophy 1 on chromosome 1p35-36. All cases showed rigidity of the spine, predominant neck and trunk weakness and frequent and severe thoracic scoliosis. Respiratory impairment was always observed in the first decade. Muscle imaging showed a marked involvement of adductors, sartorius and biceps femoris while rectus femoris and gracilis were relatively spared. This pattern of selective muscle involvement was consistent in all six cases and could be easily observed on either computerised tomography or magnetic resonance imaging. The results of this study suggest that muscle imaging, in combination with clinical assessment can help to identify the rigid spine muscular dystrophy 1 form of congenital muscular dystrophy and can help to target the appropriate genetic investigations.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            The evolution of the dystroglycan complex, a major mediator of muscle integrity

            ABSTRACT Basement membrane (BM) extracellular matrices are crucial for the coordination of different tissue layers. A matrix adhesion receptor that is important for BM function and stability in many mammalian tissues is the dystroglycan (DG) complex. This comprises the non-covalently-associated extracellular α-DG, that interacts with laminin in the BM, and the transmembrane β-DG, that interacts principally with dystrophin to connect to the actin cytoskeleton. Mutations in dystrophin, DG, or several enzymes that glycosylate α-DG underlie severe forms of human muscular dystrophy. Nonwithstanding the pathophysiological importance of the DG complex and its fundamental interest as a non-integrin system of cell-ECM adhesion, the evolution of DG and its interacting proteins is not understood. We analysed the phylogenetic distribution of DG, its proximal binding partners and key processing enzymes in extant metazoan and relevant outgroups. We identify that DG originated after the divergence of ctenophores from porifera and eumetazoa. The C-terminal half of the DG core protein is highly-conserved, yet the N-terminal region, that includes the laminin-binding region, has undergone major lineage-specific divergences. Phylogenetic analysis based on the C-terminal IG2_MAT_NU region identified three distinct clades corresponding to deuterostomes, arthropods, and mollusks/early-diverging metazoans. Whereas the glycosyltransferases that modify α-DG are also present in choanoflagellates, the DG-binding proteins dystrophin and laminin originated at the base of the metazoa, and DG-associated sarcoglycan is restricted to cnidarians and bilaterians. These findings implicate extensive functional diversification of DG within invertebrate lineages and identify the laminin-DG-dystrophin axis as a conserved adhesion system that evolved subsequent to integrin-ECM adhesion, likely to enhance the functional complexity of cell-BM interactions in early metazoans.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Genetic basis of limb-girdle muscular dystrophies: the 2014 update.

              Limb-girdle muscular dystrophies (LGMD) are a highly heterogeneous group of muscle disorders, which first affect the voluntary muscles of the hip and shoulder areas. The definition is highly descriptive and less ambiguous by exclusion: non-Xlinked, non-FSH, non-myotonic, non-distal, nonsyndromic, and non-congenital. At present, the genetic classification is becoming too complex, since the acronym LGMD has also been used for a number of other myopathic disorders with overlapping phenotypes. Today, the list of genes to be screened is too large for the gene-by-gene approach and it is well suited for targeted next generation sequencing (NGS) panels that should include any gene that has been so far associated with a clinical picture of LGMD. The present review has the aim of recapitulating the genetic basis of LGMD ordering and of proposing a nomenclature for the orphan forms. This is useful given the pace of new discoveries. Thity-one loci have been identified so far, eight autosomal dominant and 23 autosomal recessive. The dominant forms (LGMD1) are: LGMD1A (myotilin), LGMD1B (lamin A/C), LGMD1C (caveolin 3), LGMD1D (DNAJB6), LGMD1E (desmin), LGMD1F (transportin 3), LGMD1G (HNRPDL), LGMD1H (chr. 3). The autosomal recessive forms (LGMD2) are: LGMD2A (calpain 3), LGMD2B (dysferlin), LGMD2C (γ sarcoglycan), LGMD2D (α sarcoglycan), LGMD2E (β sarcoglycan), LGMD2F (δ sarcoglycan), LGMD2G (telethonin), LGMD2H (TRIM32), LGMD2I (FKRP), LGMD2J (titin), LGMD2K (POMT1), LGMD2L (anoctamin 5), LGMD2M (fukutin), LGMD2N (POMT2), LGMD2O (POMTnG1), LGMD2P (dystroglycan), LGMD2Q (plectin), LGMD2R (desmin), LGMD2S (TRAPPC11), LGMD2T (GMPPB), LGMD2U (ISPD), LGMD2V (Glucosidase, alpha ), LGMD2W (PINCH2).
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Neurol Genet
                Neurol Genet
                nng
                NNG
                Neurology: Genetics
                Wolters Kluwer (Baltimore )
                2376-7839
                11 October 2016
                December 2016
                11 October 2016
                : 2
                : 6
                : e112
                Affiliations
                From the Copenhagen Neuromuscular Center (S.T.O., J.R.D., T.O.K., J.V.), Department of Neurology, Department of Diagnostic Radiology (C.T.), Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Denmark; AP-HP, Institute of Myology (T.S.), Centre de reference des maladies neuromusculaires Paris Est, G-H Pitié-Salpêtrière; AP-HP, Hôpital Bichat (C.B.-S.), Département de Biochimie et de Génétique, Paris; Service de génétique et biologie moléculaires (J.N., F.L.), HUPC Hôpital Cochin, Paris; Laboratoire de Génétique Moléculaire and UE 7402 (M.C.), CHRU Montpellier, Université Montpellier; and Center of Reference for Neuromuscular Disorders (G.S.), CHU Bordeaux, France.
                Author notes
                Correspondence to Sofie T. Oestergaard: sofie.thuroe.oestergaard.02@ 123456regionh.dk

                Funding information and disclosures are provided at the end of the article. Go to Neurology.org/ng for full disclosure forms. The Article Processing Charge was paid by the authors.

                Article
                NG2016002733
                10.1212/NXG.0000000000000112
                5061416
                c730b640-7edb-4a73-8c1b-6442280dae0f
                © 2016 American Academy of Neurology

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND), which permits downloading and sharing the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially.

                History
                : 29 June 2016
                : 08 September 2016
                Categories
                120
                185
                Article
                Custom metadata
                TRUE

                Comments

                Comment on this article