6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Prenatal and prepubertal exposures to tobacco smoke in men may cause lower lung function in future offspring: a three-generation study using a causal modelling approach

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Mechanistic research suggests that lifestyle and environmental factors impact respiratory health across generations by epigenetic changes transmitted through male germ cells. Evidence from studies on humans is very limited.

          We investigated multigeneration causal associations to estimate the causal effects of tobacco smoking on lung function within the paternal line. We analysed data from 383 adult offspring (age 18–47 years; 52.0% female) and their 274 fathers, who had participated in the European Community Respiratory Health Survey (ECRHS)/Respiratory Health in Northern Europe, Spain and Australia (RHINESSA) generation study and had provided valid measures of pre-bronchodilator lung function. Two counterfactual-based, multilevel mediation models were developed with: paternal grandmothers’ smoking in pregnancy and fathers’ smoking initiation in prepuberty as exposures; fathers’ forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV 1) and forced vital capacity (FVC), or FEV 1/FVC z-scores as potential mediators (proxies of unobserved biological mechanisms that are true mediators); and offspring's FEV 1 and FVC, or FEV 1/FVC z-scores as outcomes. All effects were summarised as differences (Δ) in expected z-scores related to fathers’ and grandmothers’ smoking history.

          Fathers’ smoking initiation in prepuberty had a negative direct effect on both offspring's FEV 1 (Δz-score –0.36, 95% CI −0.63– −0.10) and FVC (−0.50, 95% CI −0.80– −0.20) compared with fathers’ never smoking. Paternal grandmothers’ smoking in pregnancy had a negative direct effect on fathers’ FEV 1/FVC (−0.57, 95% CI −1.09– −0.05) and a negative indirect effect on offspring's FEV 1/FVC (−0.12, 95% CI −0.21– −0.03) compared with grandmothers’ not smoking before fathers’ birth nor during fathers’ childhood.

          Fathers’ smoking in prepuberty and paternal grandmothers’ smoking in pregnancy may cause lower lung function in offspring. Our results support the concept that lifestyle-related exposures during these susceptibility periods influence the health of future generations.

          Abstract

          Fathers’ prepuberty and paternal grandmothers’ pregnancy are vulnerable periods to the adverse effects of smoking on offspring's lung function. Preventing smoking in these susceptibility time windows might improve the next generation's health. https://bit.ly/3vvgjsN

          Related collections

          Most cited references64

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Standardisation of spirometry.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and Truths about Mediation Analysis

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Multi-ethnic reference values for spirometry for the 3-95-yr age range: the global lung function 2012 equations.

              The aim of the Task Force was to derive continuous prediction equations and their lower limits of normal for spirometric indices, which are applicable globally. Over 160,000 data points from 72 centres in 33 countries were shared with the European Respiratory Society Global Lung Function Initiative. Eliminating data that could not be used (mostly missing ethnic group, some outliers) left 97,759 records of healthy nonsmokers (55.3% females) aged 2.5-95 yrs. Lung function data were collated and prediction equations derived using the LMS method, which allows simultaneous modelling of the mean (mu), the coefficient of variation (sigma) and skewness (lambda) of a distribution family. After discarding 23,572 records, mostly because they could not be combined with other ethnic or geographic groups, reference equations were derived for healthy individuals aged 3-95 yrs for Caucasians (n=57,395), African-Americans (n=3,545), and North (n=4,992) and South East Asians (n=8,255). Forced expiratory value in 1 s (FEV(1)) and forced vital capacity (FVC) between ethnic groups differed proportionally from that in Caucasians, such that FEV(1)/FVC remained virtually independent of ethnic group. For individuals not represented by these four groups, or of mixed ethnic origins, a composite equation taken as the average of the above equations is provided to facilitate interpretation until a more appropriate solution is developed. Spirometric prediction equations for the 3-95-age range are now available that include appropriate age-dependent lower limits of normal. They can be applied globally to different ethnic groups. Additional data from the Indian subcontinent and Arabic, Polynesian and Latin American countries, as well as Africa will further improve these equations in the future.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Eur Respir J
                Eur Respir J
                ERJ
                erj
                The European Respiratory Journal
                European Respiratory Society
                0903-1936
                1399-3003
                October 2021
                21 October 2021
                : 58
                : 4
                : 2002791
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Unit of Epidemiology and Medical Statistics, Dept of Diagnostics and Public Health, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
                [2 ]Centre for International Health, Dept of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
                [3 ]Faculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland
                [4 ]Dept of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
                [5 ]Oral Health Centre of Expertise in Western Norway/Vestland, Bergen, Norway
                [6 ]Section of Sustainable Health, Dept of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
                [7 ]Allergy and Lung Health Unit, School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
                [8 ]Dept of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
                [9 ]Human Development and Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
                [10 ]Occupational and Environmental Medicine, School of Public Health and Community Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
                [11 ]Dept of Medical Sciences: Respiratory, Allergy and Sleep Research, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
                [12 ]Lung Clinic, Tartu University Hospital, Tartu, Estonia
                [13 ]Dept of Medical Sciences: Clinical Physiology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
                [14 ]Servicio de Neumología, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Albacete (CHUA), Servicio de Salud de Castilla-La Mancha (SESCAM), Albacete, Spain
                [15 ]Dept of Nursing, University of Huelva, Huelva, Spain
                [16 ]Dept of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
                [17 ]Faculty of Medicine, National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK
                [18 ]MRC-PHE Centre for Environment and Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
                [19 ]Equal contribution as first authors
                [20 ]Equal contribution as last authors
                Author notes
                Corresponding author: Simone Accordini ( simone.accordini@ 123456univr.it )
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5319-525X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4388-784X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0159-6657
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9998-0464
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5093-6980
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0869-6914
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4098-7765
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2778-658X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7187-9989
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1753-3896
                Article
                ERJ-02791-2020
                10.1183/13993003.02791-2020
                8529197
                33795316
                c5b60846-e47c-421a-bf4a-1c7b68ae0306
                Copyright ©The authors 2021.

                This version is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Licence 4.0. For commercial reproduction rights and permissions contact permissions@ersnet.org

                History
                : 15 July 2020
                : 11 March 2021
                Funding
                Funded by: Horizon 2020 Framework Programme, open-funder-registry 10.13039/100010661;
                Award ID: 633212
                Categories
                Original Research Articles
                Paediatrics
                9

                Respiratory medicine
                Respiratory medicine

                Comments

                Comment on this article