23
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
3 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Heterologous vaccination of BNT162b2 in Ad26. COV2.S-vaccinated healthcare workers elicits long-term humoral immune response

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          BACKGROUND: To date, there are no immunological data for the SARS-CoV-2 heterologous vaccination schedule in the South African (SA) population OBJECTIVES: To assess and compare the immunogenicity and reactogenicity of the Jansen Ad26.COV2.S vaccine with the Pfizer/BioNTech-BNT162b2 booster following prime Ad26.COV2.S in 65 SA healthcare workers METHODS: In a prospective, quantitative, cross-sectional trial on individuals >18 years of age vaccinated with a single Ad26.COV2.S dose or single Ad26.COV2.S and a BNT162b2 single-dose/both doses booster, participants filled in a questionnaire on their demographics, type of vaccination, breakthrough infection/s (BTI/s), vaccine reactogenicity, prior SARS-CoV-2 infection and dates of vaccination. Qualitative analysis for presence/absence of anti-S (spike) immunoglobulin G (IgG) was performed using the Euroimmun anti-IgG enzyme-linked immunoassay kit, and anti-S IgG titres were quantitatively assessed using the Abbott IgG Quant II kit RESULTS: Between 28 October 2021 and 30 November 2021, 65 individuals were enrolled and assigned as either prime Ad26.COV2.S (n=18) or Ad26.COV2.S with a BNT162b2 supplement (n=47) at Charlotte Maxeke Johannesburg Academic Hospital, SA (mean age 45 years (95% confidence interval (CI) 29.5 - 58), 42 women (64.6%) and 23 men (35.4%)). The median IgG titre for the primed Ad26.COV2.S group was 4 272.55 (95% CI 68.40 - 10 351.40) and that for the BNT162b2 supplement group was 7 360.80 (95% CI 4 207.40 - 15 372.60). In the univariate model, the BNT162b2 supplement group showed a significant 1.99 times higher antibody titre factor (95% CI 0.045 -5.553; p<0.005) than the Ad26.COV2.S group. In both univariate and multivariate models, age, time since prime vaccination, BTI and prior infection failed to show any statistically significant association (p>0.05) with antibody titres in both groups. However, sex (-55.381 (95% CI -76.984 - -13.498; p=0.018) in a multivariate model was found to have a statistically significant association with anti-S IgG titres observed in both groups. Participants who received their first dose of BNT162b2 9-10 months after their prime Ad26.COV2.S (n=44) had a higher degree of antibody response than those who received it earlier. Reactogenicity was observed to be manageable, with mild/moderate adverse effects in the study population CONCLUSION: A BNT162b2 supplement given in single or two doses as booster in individuals primed with Ad26.COV2.S induced immunological response, with acceptable and manageable reactogenicity. This study provides novel evidence of the highest degree of antibody response in individuals who received a BNT162b2 first dose 9-10 months after prime Ad26.COV2.S, implying that a longer time gap between the two vaccines stimulates higher antibody response than a shorter gap, and that this antibody response can persist for as long as 6 months after the last BNT162b2 dose

          Related collections

          Most cited references27

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Effectiveness of Covid-19 Vaccines against the B.1.617.2 (Delta) Variant

          Background The B.1.617.2 (delta) variant of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the virus that causes coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19), has contributed to a surge in cases in India and has now been detected across the globe, including a notable increase in cases in the United Kingdom. The effectiveness of the BNT162b2 and ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccines against this variant has been unclear. Methods We used a test-negative case–control design to estimate the effectiveness of vaccination against symptomatic disease caused by the delta variant or the predominant strain (B.1.1.7, or alpha variant) over the period that the delta variant began circulating. Variants were identified with the use of sequencing and on the basis of the spike ( S ) gene status. Data on all symptomatic sequenced cases of Covid-19 in England were used to estimate the proportion of cases with either variant according to the patients’ vaccination status. Results Effectiveness after one dose of vaccine (BNT162b2 or ChAdOx1 nCoV-19) was notably lower among persons with the delta variant (30.7%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 25.2 to 35.7) than among those with the alpha variant (48.7%; 95% CI, 45.5 to 51.7); the results were similar for both vaccines. With the BNT162b2 vaccine, the effectiveness of two doses was 93.7% (95% CI, 91.6 to 95.3) among persons with the alpha variant and 88.0% (95% CI, 85.3 to 90.1) among those with the delta variant. With the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine, the effectiveness of two doses was 74.5% (95% CI, 68.4 to 79.4) among persons with the alpha variant and 67.0% (95% CI, 61.3 to 71.8) among those with the delta variant. Conclusions Only modest differences in vaccine effectiveness were noted with the delta variant as compared with the alpha variant after the receipt of two vaccine doses. Absolute differences in vaccine effectiveness were more marked after the receipt of the first dose. This finding would support efforts to maximize vaccine uptake with two doses among vulnerable populations. (Funded by Public Health England.)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Inhibition of SARS-CoV-2 Infections in Engineered Human Tissues Using Clinical-Grade Soluble Human ACE2

            Summary We have previously provided the first genetic evidence that angiotensin converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) is the critical receptor for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV), and ACE2 protects the lung from injury, providing a molecular explanation for the severe lung failure and death due to SARS-CoV infections. ACE2 has now also been identified as a key receptor for SARS-CoV-2 infections, and it has been proposed that inhibiting this interaction might be used in treating patients with COVID-19. However, it is not known whether human recombinant soluble ACE2 (hrsACE2) blocks growth of SARS-CoV-2. Here, we show that clinical grade hrsACE2 reduced SARS-CoV-2 recovery from Vero cells by a factor of 1,000–5,000. An equivalent mouse rsACE2 had no effect. We also show that SARS-CoV-2 can directly infect engineered human blood vessel organoids and human kidney organoids, which can be inhibited by hrsACE2. These data demonstrate that hrsACE2 can significantly block early stages of SARS-CoV-2 infections.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The Architecture of SARS-CoV-2 Transcriptome

              Summary SARS-CoV-2 is a betacoronavirus responsible for the COVID-19 pandemic. Although the SARS-CoV-2 genome was reported recently, its transcriptomic architecture is unknown. Utilizing two complementary sequencing techniques, we present a high-resolution map of the SARS-CoV-2 transcriptome and epitranscriptome. DNA nanoball sequencing shows that the transcriptome is highly complex owing to numerous discontinuous transcription events. In addition to the canonical genomic and 9 subgenomic RNAs, SARS-CoV-2 produces transcripts encoding unknown ORFs with fusion, deletion, and/or frameshift. Using nanopore direct RNA sequencing, we further find at least 41 RNA modification sites on viral transcripts, with the most frequent motif, AAGAA. Modified RNAs have shorter poly(A) tails than unmodified RNAs, suggesting a link between the modification and the 3′ tail. Functional investigation of the unknown transcripts and RNA modifications discovered in this study will open new directions to our understanding of the life cycle and pathogenicity of SARS-CoV-2.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                samj
                SAMJ: South African Medical Journal
                SAMJ, S. Afr. med. j.
                South African Medical Association (Pretoria, Gauteng, South Africa )
                0256-9574
                2078-5135
                October 2022
                : 112
                : 10
                Affiliations
                [03] Johannesburg orgnameUniversity of the Witwatersrand orgdiv1Faculty of Health Sciences orgdiv2Department of Molecular Medicine and Haematology South Africa
                [01] Johannesburg orgnameUniversity of the Witwatersrand orgdiv1Faculty of Health Sciences orgdiv2Department of Molecular Medicine and Haematology South Africa
                [06] orgnameUniversity of the Witwatersrand orgdiv1Faculty of Health Sciences orgdiv2Clinical Laboratory Services South Africa
                [07] orgnameUniversity of Cape Town orgdiv1Faculty of Health Sciences orgdiv2Division of Immunology South Africa
                [05] Johannesburg orgnameCharlotte Maxeke Johannesburg Academic Hospital orgdiv1Department of Medicine and National Health Laboratory Service South Africa
                [02] Johannesburg orgnameUniversity of the Witwatersrand orgdiv1Faculty of Health Sciences orgdiv2Department of Molecular Medicine and Haematology South Africa
                [09] Johannesburg orgnameUniversity of the Witwatersrand orgdiv1Faculty of Health Sciences orgdiv2Clinical HIV Research Unit
                [04] Johannesburg orgnameUniversity of the Witwatersrand orgdiv1Faculty of Health Sciences orgdiv2Department of Molecular Medicine and Haematology South Africa
                [10] Cape Town orgnameSouth African Medical Research Council South Africa
                [08] orgnameUniversity of Cape Town orgdiv1Faculty of Health Sciences orgdiv2Institute of Infectious Disease and Molecular Medicine South Africa
                Article
                S0256-95742022001200011 S0256-9574(22)11201000011
                10.7196/SAMJ.2022.v112i11.16614
                c4e44641-5e21-4f1c-b1a6-5897dd98169a

                This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

                History
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 0, Equations: 0, References: 27, Pages: 0
                Product

                SciELO South Africa

                Self URI: Full text available only in PDF format (EN)
                Categories
                Research

                Comments

                Comment on this article