6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Linking Anger Trait with Somatization in Low-Grade College Students: Moderating Roles of Family Cohesion and Adaptability Translated title: 低年级大学生中与愤怒特质相关联的躯体化:家庭亲密度和适应性的调节作用

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Between 22% and 58% of patients in primary care settings complain of somatic symptoms. Previous research has found that somatization was associated with anger traits and family functions. However, studies that specifically assess the moderating effect of family function in how anger traits become somatic complaints are lacking.

          Aim

          This study was designed to examine whether the variances in family cohesion and family adaptability moderated the strength of the relationship between anger traits and somatization.

          Methods

          A cross-section design was conducted and 2008 college students were recruited from a comprehensive university in Shanghai. All participants finished questionnaires including Symptom Check List- 90 (SCL-90), State-Trait Anger Expression Inventory 2 (STAXI-2, Chinese version) and Family Adaptability and Cohesion Scale, second edition (FACES II, Chinese Version) to assess their degree of current somatization, anger trait and family function. Hierarchical linear regression analysis (Enter) was conducted respectively for men and women to examine the moderation effect of family cohesion and family adaptability in the association between anger and somatization.

          Results

          Somatic symptoms were significantly linked in the expected directions with depression and anger trait for both genders. Family cohesion and family adaptability were negatively associated with somatic symptoms. For female college students family cohesion was found to moderate the link between anger trait and somatization, but for male college students the moderation effect of family cohesion was marginally significant. The moderating role of family adaptability was significant for neither male nor female after current depressive symptoms were accounted for.

          Conclusion

          Proneness to anger is an independent predictor of somatization. For women, a high level of family cohesion was a protective factor which could reduce the influence of anger trait on somatic symptoms. Without comorbidity of current depression, family adaptability to some degree exempted individuals with anger proneness from developing somatic complaints. Interventions that integrate family cohesion cultivation, family flexibility fostering and depression treatment might be more effective for somatic patients high in anger trait.

          Translated abstract

          背景

          22% 至58% 的患者在初级保健机构主诉躯体症 状。既往研究发现躯体化与愤怒特质和家庭功能相关。 然而,有关研究却非常缺乏,特别是评估家庭功能在 愤怒特质如何成为躯体主诉中的调节作用。

          目的

          本研究的目的是验证家庭亲密度和适应性的变 化是否调节愤怒特质和躯体化之间的关系强度。

          方法

          采用横断面研究设计并从上海一所综合性大学 招募2008 名大学生。所有参加者完成问卷,包括采用 症状自评量表(SCL-90)、状态- 特质愤怒表达量表2 (STAXI-2 中文版)、家庭亲密度和适应性量表第二版 (FACES II 中文版)来评估其当前的躯体化程度、愤怒 特质与家庭功能。采用分层线性回归分析(进入)分 别对男性和女性验证家庭亲密度和适应性对愤怒和躯 体化之间的关联性的调节作用。

          结果

          躯体症状在男性女性中均与抑郁和愤怒特质以 预期的方向显著相关。家庭亲密度和家庭适应性与躯 体症状呈负相关。女大学生家庭亲密度对愤怒特质和 躯体化之间的联系起到调节作用,而男大学生家庭亲 密度的调节作用是轻微的。变量目前抑郁症状矫正后, 家庭适应能力的调节作用在男性和女性中均没有显著 性。

          结论

          容易愤怒是躯体化的一个独立预测因素。对于 女性来说,较高的家庭凝聚力是一种保护因素,可以 减少愤怒特质对躯体症状的影响。没有当前抑郁的共 病的话,家庭适应性在一定程度上可以避免有愤怒倾 向的个体发展为躯体化。家庭凝聚力培养、家庭灵活 性培养和抑郁治疗相结合的干预措施可能对有愤怒特 质的躯体化患者更有效。

          Related collections

          Most cited references34

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Little emperors: behavioral impacts of China's One-Child Policy.

          We document that China's One-Child Policy (OCP), one of the most radical approaches to limiting population growth, has produced significantly less trusting, less trustworthy, more risk-averse, less competitive, more pessimistic, and less conscientious individuals. Our data were collected from economics experiments conducted with 421 individuals born just before and just after the OCP's introduction in 1979. Surveys to elicit personality traits were also used. We used the exogenous imposition of the OCP to identify the causal impact of being an only child, net of family background effects. The OCP thus has significant ramifications for Chinese society.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            How do risk factors work together? Mediators, moderators, and independent, overlapping, and proxy risk factors.

            The authors developed a methodological basis for investigating how risk factors work together. Better methods are needed for understanding the etiology of disorders, such as psychiatric syndromes, that presumably are the result of complex causal chains. Approaches from psychology, epidemiology, clinical trials, and basic sciences were synthesized. The authors define conceptually and operationally five different clinically important ways in which two risk factors may work together to influence an outcome: as proxy, overlapping, and independent risk factors and as mediators and moderators. Classifying putative risk factors into these qualitatively different types can help identify high-risk individuals in need of preventive interventions and can help inform the content of such interventions. These methods may also help bridge the gaps between theory, the basic and clinical sciences, and clinical and policy applications and thus aid the search for early diagnoses and for highly effective preventive and treatment interventions.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Mapping the road from childhood trauma to adult somatization: the role of attachment.

              This study tested whether insecure attachment mediates the link between childhood trauma and adult somatization. A community sample of 101 couples completed self-report measures, including the Relationship Scales Questionnaire, the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire, the Somatic Symptom Inventory, the Beck Depression Inventory, and the Conflict Tactics Scale. Childhood trauma was associated with higher levels of somatization and insecure attachment. Insecure attachment style was also associated with higher levels of somatization. Controlling for age, income, and recent intimate partner violence, analyses showed that fearful attachment fully mediated the link between childhood trauma and somatization for women. For men, there was no such mediation, but both childhood trauma and insecure attachment styles made independent contributions to predicting levels of somatization. Findings are consistent with the hypothesis that, for women, childhood trauma influences adult levels of somatization by fostering insecure adult attachment. For men, findings suggest that trauma and attachment are both important independent predictors of adult somatization. Study results support the idea that childhood trauma shapes patients' styles of relating to others in times of need, and these styles, in turn, influence the somatization process and how patients respond to providers. Screening for attachment style may provide information that could allow health care providers to tailor treatment more effectively.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Shanghai Arch Psychiatry
                SAP
                Shanghai Archives of Psychiatry
                Shanghai Municipal Bureau of Publishing
                1002-0829
                25 February 2017
                25 February 2017
                : 29
                : 1
                : 30-40
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Pudong New District Mental Health Center , Shanghai, China
                [2 ]Department of clinical psychology, Shanghai East Hospital, Tongji University School of Medical , Shanghai, China
                [3 ]Tonjgi University , Shanghai, China
                Author notes
                * Dr. Liang Liu. Mailing address: 165 Sanlin RD, Shanghai Pudong New District Mental Health Center, Shanghai, China. Postcode: 200122. Goldwalker@ 123456163.com
                Article
                10.11919/j.issn.1002-0829.216102
                5518252
                28769543
                c4a72664-08a6-4d74-8b33-abcf476fcc99
                © Shanghai Municipal Bureau of Publishing

                This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Share Alike 4.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/

                History
                Page count
                Figures: 3, Tables: 4, Equations: 0, References: 37, Pages: 11
                Categories
                Original Research Article

                family cohesion,family adaptability,family conflict,anger proneness,anger trait,moderation,somatization

                Comments

                Comment on this article