3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Impact of Empagliflozin in Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction in Patients With Ischemic Versus Nonischemic Cause

      research-article
      , MD, MSc 1 , , MD, MPH, MBA 2 , 3 , , , MD, PhD 4 , 5 , 6 , , MD 7 , , MD 8 , , PhD 9 ,   , MD 10 , , MD 11 , , MD 12 , , MD 13 , , MD, PhD 14 , , MD 15 , 16 , 17 , , MD 18 , , Dipl Math 19 , , MD, PhD 20 , , MD 21 , 22
      Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease
      John Wiley and Sons Inc.
      empagliflozin, heart failure, ischemic cause, reduced ejection fraction, sodium‐glucose co‐transporter‐2, Cardiomyopathy, Chronic Ischemic Heart Disease

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Outcomes and treatment effects of therapy may vary according to the cause of heart failure (HF).

          Methods and Results

          In this post hoc analysis of the EMPEROR‐Reduced (Empagliflozin Outcome Trial in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction) trial, the effect of empagliflozin on cardiovascular and renal outcomes was assessed according to the cause of HF. The cause of HF was investigator reported and stratified as ischemic or nonischemic. Cox proportional hazards models were used to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs. Of the 3730 patients enrolled, 1929 (51.7%) had ischemic cause. In the placebo arm, patients with ischemic cause of HF did not have a significantly higher risk of cardiovascular mortality (HR, 1.21 [95% CI, 0.90–1.63]) and hospitalization for HF (HR, 0.90 [95% CI, 0.72–1.12]) compared with nonischemic cause. Empagliflozin compared with placebo significantly reduced the risk of cardiovascular death or hospitalization for HF in patients with ischemic and nonischemic cause (HR, 0.82 [95% CI, 0.68–0.99] for ischemic and HR, 0.67 [95% CI, 0.55–0.82] for nonischemic cause; P interaction=0.15). The benefit of empagliflozin on HF hospitalization, the renal composite end point, estimated glomerular filtration slope changes, and health status scores were also consistent in both groups without treatment by cause modification.

          Conclusions

          Empagliflozin offers cardiovascular and renal benefits in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction regardless of the cause of HF.

          Registration

          URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03057977.

          Related collections

          Most cited references20

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Dapagliflozin in Patients with Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction

          In patients with type 2 diabetes, inhibitors of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) reduce the risk of a first hospitalization for heart failure, possibly through glucose-independent mechanisms. More data are needed regarding the effects of SGLT2 inhibitors in patients with established heart failure and a reduced ejection fraction, regardless of the presence or absence of type 2 diabetes.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Cardiovascular and Renal Outcomes with Empagliflozin in Heart Failure

            Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors reduce the risk of hospitalization for heart failure in patients regardless of the presence or absence of diabetes. More evidence is needed regarding the effects of these drugs in patients across the broad spectrum of heart failure, including those with a markedly reduced ejection fraction.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Angiotensin–Neprilysin Inhibition versus Enalapril in Heart Failure

              We compared the angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor LCZ696 with enalapril in patients who had heart failure with a reduced ejection fraction. In previous studies, enalapril improved survival in such patients. In this double-blind trial, we randomly assigned 8442 patients with class II, III, or IV heart failure and an ejection fraction of 40% or less to receive either LCZ696 (at a dose of 200 mg twice daily) or enalapril (at a dose of 10 mg twice daily), in addition to recommended therapy. The primary outcome was a composite of death from cardiovascular causes or hospitalization for heart failure, but the trial was designed to detect a difference in the rates of death from cardiovascular causes. The trial was stopped early, according to prespecified rules, after a median follow-up of 27 months, because the boundary for an overwhelming benefit with LCZ696 had been crossed. At the time of study closure, the primary outcome had occurred in 914 patients (21.8%) in the LCZ696 group and 1117 patients (26.5%) in the enalapril group (hazard ratio in the LCZ696 group, 0.80; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.73 to 0.87; P<0.001). A total of 711 patients (17.0%) receiving LCZ696 and 835 patients (19.8%) receiving enalapril died (hazard ratio for death from any cause, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.76 to 0.93; P<0.001); of these patients, 558 (13.3%) and 693 (16.5%), respectively, died from cardiovascular causes (hazard ratio, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.71 to 0.89; P<0.001). As compared with enalapril, LCZ696 also reduced the risk of hospitalization for heart failure by 21% (P<0.001) and decreased the symptoms and physical limitations of heart failure (P=0.001). The LCZ696 group had higher proportions of patients with hypotension and nonserious angioedema but lower proportions with renal impairment, hyperkalemia, and cough than the enalapril group. LCZ696 was superior to enalapril in reducing the risks of death and of hospitalization for heart failure. (Funded by Novartis; PARADIGM-HF ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01035255.).
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                javed.butler@bswhealth.org
                Journal
                J Am Heart Assoc
                J Am Heart Assoc
                10.1002/(ISSN)2047-9980
                JAH3
                ahaoa
                Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                2047-9980
                24 December 2022
                03 January 2023
                : 12
                : 1 ( doiID: 10.1002/jah3.v12.1 )
                : e027652
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Division of Cardiology Duke University School of Medicine Durham NC
                [ 2 ] Baylor Scott and White Research Institute Dallas TX
                [ 3 ] Department of Medicine University of Mississippi School of Medicine Jackson MS
                [ 4 ] Department of Cardiology (CVK) Berlin Institute of Health Center for Regenerative Therapies (BCRT), German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK) partner site Berlin Berlin Germany
                [ 5 ] Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin Berlin Germany
                [ 6 ] Institute of Heart Diseases Wrocław Medical University Wrocław Poland
                [ 7 ] National and Kapodistrian University of Athens School of Medicine, Athens University Hospital Attikon Athens Greece
                [ 8 ] Institut Lorrain du Coeur et des Vaisseaux Nancy France
                [ 9 ] Department of Medical Statistics, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine London United Kingdom
                [ 10 ] Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital Boston MA
                [ 11 ] Department of Medicine Wayne State and Central Michigan Universities Detroit MI
                [ 12 ] Department of Internal Medicine III University Hospital Saarland, Saarland University Homburg Saar Germany
                [ 13 ] Centre for Heart Diseases Wrocław Medical University Wrocław Poland
                [ 14 ] Division of Cardiac Surgery, St Michael’s Hospital University of Toronto Toronto Canada
                [ 15 ] Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH Ingelheim Germany
                [ 16 ] Faculty of Medicine Mannheim University of Heidelberg Mannheim Germany
                [ 17 ] First Department of Medicine Faculty of Medicine Mannheim of the University of Heidelberg Mannheim Germany
                [ 18 ] Boehringer Ingelheim AB Stockholm Sweden
                [ 19 ] Université de Lorraine, CIC Inserm, CHRU Nancy Nancy France
                [ 20 ] Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. KG Biberach Germany
                [ 21 ] Baylor University Medical Center Dallas TX
                [ 22 ] Imperial College London United Kingdom
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence to: Javed Butler, MD, MPH, MBA, Baylor Scott and White Research Institute, 3434 Live Oak Street, Ste 501, Dallas, TX 75204.

                Email: javed.butler@ 123456bswhealth.org

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1250-6351
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7683-4720
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0805-8683
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5640-0332
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2304-6138
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8338-1798
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4986-7129
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2976-2514
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3391-7064
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4018-8533
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1215-0746
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0639-8836
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7456-1570
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1828-2387
                Article
                JAH38073 JAHA/2022/027652-T
                10.1161/JAHA.122.027652
                9973606
                36565199
                c48d313b-c909-4f19-ac45-da463983a116
                © 2022 The Authors and Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.

                History
                : 23 September 2022
                : 14 November 2022
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 4, Pages: 8, Words: 4491
                Funding
                Funded by: Boehringer Ingelheim , doi 10.13039/100008349;
                Funded by: Eli Lilly and Company , doi 10.13039/100004312;
                Categories
                Original Research
                Original Research
                Heart Failure
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                03 January 2023
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:6.2.3 mode:remove_FC converted:23.01.2023

                Cardiovascular Medicine
                empagliflozin,heart failure,ischemic cause,reduced ejection fraction,sodium‐glucose co‐transporter‐2,cardiomyopathy,chronic ischemic heart disease

                Comments

                Comment on this article