22
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Fixed-dose combination fluticasone/formoterol for asthma treatment in a real-world setting: meta-analysis of exacerbation rates and asthma control

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          ABSTRACT

          Background: Treatment guidelines for asthma management are derived almost exclusively from the results of controlled clinical trials undertaken in carefully selected patient populations; meaning that their outcomes may not reflect the true performance of treatments when used in general daily medical practice. The aim of this meta-analysis was to combine the results of observational studies investigating the fluticasone propionate/formoterol (FP/FORM) fixed-dose combination in real-world asthma patients. Methods: A systemic literature review was completed in March 2019 using the PubMed database. We identified 394 studies. Five studies, which included a total of 4756 patients treated with FP/FORM, were judged eligible and included in the meta-analysis. Results: The estimated severe asthma exacerbation rate was 11.47% (95% CI, 5.8 to 18.72%), calculated from the random effect model. A sensitivity analysis excluding 2 studies (one was an outlier, and the exacerbation rate for the studied treatment alone could not be determined in the other) showed a 7.04% rate of severe asthma exacerbations. The estimated relative risk of the incidence of severe asthma exacerbations was 0.323 (95% CI, 0.159 to 0.658). The estimated asthma control rate was 60.6% (95% CI, 55.7% to 65.6%). The odds of achieving asthma control significantly increased by FP/FORM compared with pre-study conditions (estimated odds ratio: 2.214 [95% CI, 1.292 to 3.795]; p < 0.001). Conclusions: The findings of this meta-analysis confirm the effectiveness of FP/FORM for the treatment of asthma patients in a real-world setting beyond the limitations of RCTs.

          Related collections

          Most cited references42

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions

            Non-randomised studies of the effects of interventions are critical to many areas of healthcare evaluation, but their results may be biased. It is therefore important to understand and appraise their strengths and weaknesses. We developed ROBINS-I (“Risk Of Bias In Non-randomised Studies - of Interventions”), a new tool for evaluating risk of bias in estimates of the comparative effectiveness (harm or benefit) of interventions from studies that did not use randomisation to allocate units (individuals or clusters of individuals) to comparison groups. The tool will be particularly useful to those undertaking systematic reviews that include non-randomised studies.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Meta-analysis in clinical trials

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Eur Clin Respir J
                Eur Clin Respir J
                European Clinical Respiratory Journal
                Taylor & Francis
                2001-8525
                6 February 2023
                2023
                6 February 2023
                : 10
                : 1
                : 2174642
                Affiliations
                [a ]Chair of Respiratory Medicine, University of Ferrara; , Ferrara, Italy
                [b ]Regional Therapeutic Leadership Team, Zuellig Pharma Therapeutics; , Singapore, Singapore
                [c ]Respiratory & Ophthalmology, Mundipharma; , Asia Pacific, Singapore
                [d ]Head of Medical Affairs & Compliance, Mundipharma Saudi Arabia; , Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
                [e ]Medical Specialist, Clinical Ops & Research, Medical Information, Mundipharma GCC; , Dubai, United Arab Emirates
                [f ]Department of Respiratory Medicine, University Hospital of Copenhagen; , Copenhagen, Denmark
                [g ]Pulmonary Group Practice; , Koblenz, Germany
                [h ]National Heart and Lung Institute (NHLI), Imperial College London; , London, UK
                Author notes
                CONTACT Alberto Papi alberto.papi@ 123456unife.it ; ppa@ 123456unife.it Chair of Respiratory Medicine, University of Ferrara; , Via Savonarola, 9, 44121 Ferrara FE, Italy
                Article
                2174642
                10.1080/20018525.2023.2174642
                9930770
                c45fd819-0fc7-4eb9-9ba4-e11d8922f987
                © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                Page count
                Figures: 5, Tables: 7, References: 43, Pages: 1
                Categories
                Review Article
                Review Article

                asthma,real-world setting,fluticasone,formoterol,fixed-dose combination,meta-analysis

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content312

                Most referenced authors919