Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
10
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Prediction performance advantages of deep machine learning algorithms for two-phase flow rates through wellhead chokes

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Two-phase flow rate estimation of liquid and gas flow through wellhead chokes is essential for determining and monitoring production performance from oil and gas reservoirs at specific well locations. Liquid flow rate (Q L) tends to be nonlinearly related to these influencing variables, making empirical correlations unreliable for predictions applied to different reservoir conditions and favoring machine learning (ML) algorithms for that purpose. Recent advances in deep learning (DL) algorithms make them useful for predicting wellhead choke flow rates for large field datasets and suitable for wider application once trained. DL has not previously been applied to predict Q L from a large oil field. In this study, 7245 multi-well data records from Sorush oil field are used to compare the Q L prediction performance of traditional empirical, ML and DL algorithms based on four influencing variables: choke size (D 64), wellhead pressure (P wh), oil specific gravity (γ o) and gas–liquid ratio (GLR). The prevailing flow regime for the wells evaluated is critical flow. The DL algorithm substantially outperforms the other algorithms considered in terms of Q L prediction accuracy. The DL algorithm predicts Q L for the testing subset with a root-mean-squared error (RMSE) of 196 STB/day and coefficient of determination (R 2) of 0.9969 for Sorush dataset. The Q L prediction accuracy of the models evaluated for this dataset can be arranged in the descending order: DL > DT > RF > ANN > SVR > Pilehvari > Baxendell > Ros > Glbert > Achong. Analysis reveals that input variable GLR has the greatest, whereas input variable D 64 has the least relative influence on dependent variable Q L.

          Related collections

          Most cited references73

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Support-vector networks

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Deep learning in neural networks: An overview

            In recent years, deep artificial neural networks (including recurrent ones) have won numerous contests in pattern recognition and machine learning. This historical survey compactly summarizes relevant work, much of it from the previous millennium. Shallow and Deep Learners are distinguished by the depth of their credit assignment paths, which are chains of possibly learnable, causal links between actions and effects. I review deep supervised learning (also recapitulating the history of backpropagation), unsupervised learning, reinforcement learning & evolutionary computation, and indirect search for short programs encoding deep and large networks.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              A tutorial on support vector regression

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                Journal
                Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology
                J Petrol Explor Prod Technol
                Springer Science and Business Media LLC
                2190-0558
                2190-0566
                March 2021
                February 23 2021
                March 2021
                : 11
                : 3
                : 1233-1261
                Article
                10.1007/s13202-021-01087-4
                c4112fce-6393-4b4b-8085-993a2a6b1700
                © 2021

                https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0

                https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content153

                Cited by8

                Most referenced authors620